Ralph Waldo Emerson by Oliver Wendell Holmes (page 4)

The “Progress of Culture” was delivered as a Phi Beta Kappa oration just thirty years after his first address before the same society. It is very instructive to compare the two orations written at the interval of a whole generation: one in 1837, at the age of thirty-four; the other in 1867, at the age of sixty-four. Both are hopeful, but the second is more sanguine than the first. He recounts what he considers the recent gains of the reforming movement:–

“Observe the marked ethical quality of the innovations urged or adopted. The new claim of woman to a political status is itself an honorable testimony to the civilization which has given her a civil status new in history. Now that by the increased humanity of law she controls her property, she inevitably takes the next step to her share in power.”

He enumerates many other gains, from the war or from the growth of intelligence,–“All, one may say, in a high degree revolutionary, teaching nations the taking of governments into their own hands, and superseding kings.”

He repeats some of his fundamental formulae.

“The foundation of culture, as of character, is at last the moral sentiment.

“Great men are they who see that spiritual is stronger than any material force, that thoughts rule the world.

“Periodicity, reaction, are laws of mind as well as of matter.”

And most encouraging it is to read in 1884 what was written in 1867,–especially in the view of future possibilities. “Bad kings and governors help us, if only they are bad enough.” _Non tali auxilio_, we exclaim, with a shudder of remembrance, and are very glad to read these concluding words: “I read the promise of better times and of greater men.”

In the year 1866, Emerson reached the age which used to be spoken of as the “grand climacteric.” In that year Harvard University conferred upon him the degree of Doctor of Laws, the highest honor in its gift.

In that same year, having left home on one of his last lecturing trips, he met his son, Dr. Edward Waldo Emerson, at the Brevoort House, in New York. Then, and in that place, he read to his son the poem afterwards published in the “Atlantic Monthly,” and in his second volume, under the title “Terminus.” This was the first time that Dr. Emerson recognized the fact that his father felt himself growing old. The thought, which must have been long shaping itself in the father’s mind, had been so far from betraying itself that it was a shock to the son to hear it plainly avowed. The poem is one of his noblest; he could not fold his robes about him with more of serene dignity than in these solemn lines. The reader may remember that one passage from it has been quoted for a particular purpose, but here is the whole poem:–

TERMINUS.

It is time to be old,
To take in sail:–
The god of bounds,
Who sets to seas a shore,
Came to me in his fatal rounds,
And said: “No more!
No farther shoot
Thy broad ambitious branches, and thy root. Fancy departs: no more invent;
Contract thy firmament
To compass of a tent.
There’s not enough for this and that, Make thy option which of two;
Economize the failing river,
Not the less revere the Giver,
Leave the many and hold the few,
Timely wise accept the terms,
Soften the fall with wary foot;
A little while
Still plan and smile,
And,–fault of novel germs,–
Mature the unfallen fruit.
Curse, if thou wilt, thy sires,
Bad husbands of their fires,
Who when they gave thee breath,
Failed to bequeath
The needful sinew stark as once,
The baresark marrow to thy bones,
But left a legacy of ebbing veins, Inconstant heat and nerveless reins,–
Amid the Muses, left thee deaf and dumb, Amid the gladiators, halt and numb.

“As the bird trims her to the gale
I trim myself to the storm of time, I man the rudder, reef the sail,
Obey the voice at eve obeyed at prime: ‘Lowly faithful, banish fear,
Right onward drive unharmed;
The port, well worth the cruise, is near, And every wave is charmed.'”

CHAPTER XI.

1868-1873. AET. 65-70.

Lectures on the Natural History of the Intellect.–Publication of “Society and Solitude.” Contents: Society and Solitude. –Civilization.–Art.–Eloquence.–Domestic Life.–Farming. –Works and Days.–Books.–Clubs.–Courage.–Success.–Old Age.–Other Literary Labors.–Visit to California.–Burning of his House, and the Story of its Rebuilding.–Third Visit to Europe.–His Reception at Concord on his Return.

During three successive years, 1868, 1869, 1870, Emerson delivered a series of Lectures at Harvard University on the “Natural History of the Intellect.” These Lectures, as I am told by Dr. Emerson, cost him a great deal of labor, but I am not aware that they have been collected or reported. They will be referred to in the course of this chapter, in an extract from Prof. Thayer’s “Western Journey with Mr. Emerson.” He is there reported as saying that he cared very little for metaphysics. It is very certain that he makes hardly any use of the ordinary terms employed by metaphysicians. If he does not hold the words “subject and object” with their adjectives, in the same contempt that Mr. Ruskin shows for them, he very rarely employs either of these expressions. Once he ventures on the _not me_, but in the main he uses plain English handles for the few metaphysical tools he has occasion to employ.

“Society and Solitude” was published in 1870. The first Essay in the volume bears the same name as the volume itself.

In this first Essay Emerson is very fair to the antagonistic claims of solitary and social life. He recognizes the organic necessity of solitude. We are driven “as with whips into the desert.” But there is danger in this seclusion. “Now and then a man exquisitely made can live alone and must; but coop up most men and you undo them.–Here again, as so often, Nature delights to put us between extreme antagonisms, and our safety is in the skill with which we keep the diagonal line.–The conditions are met, if we keep our independence yet do not lose our sympathy.”

The Essay on “Civilization” is pleasing, putting familiar facts in a very agreeable way. The framed or stone-house in place of the cave or the camp, the building of roads, the change from war, hunting, and pasturage to agriculture, the division of labor, the skilful combinations of civil government, the diffusion of knowledge through the press, are well worn subjects which he treats agreeably, if not with special brilliancy:–

“Right position of woman in the State is another index.–Place the sexes in right relations of mutual respect, and a severe morality gives that essential charm to a woman which educates all that is delicate, poetic, and self-sacrificing; breeds courtesy and learning, conversation and wit, in her rough mate, so that I have thought a sufficient measure of civilization is the influence of good women.”

My attention was drawn to one paragraph for a reason which my reader will readily understand, and I trust look upon good-naturedly:–

“The ship, in its latest complete equipment, is an abridgment and compend of a nation’s arts: the ship steered by compass and chart, longitude reckoned by lunar observation and by chronometer, driven by steam; and in wildest sea-mountains, at vast distances from home,–

“‘The pulses of her iron heart
Go beating through the storm.'”

I cannot be wrong, it seems to me, in supposing those two lines to be an incorrect version of these two from a poem of my own called “The Steamboat:”

“The beating of her restless heart
Still sounding through the storm.”

It is never safe to quote poetry from memory, at least while the writer lives, for he is ready to “cavil on the ninth part of a hair” where his verses are concerned. But extreme accuracy was not one of Emerson’s special gifts, and vanity whispers to the misrepresented versifier that

’tis better to be quoted wrong
Than to be quoted not at all.

This Essay of Emerson’s is irradiated by a single precept that is worthy to stand by the side of that which Juvenal says came from heaven. How could the man in whose thought such a meteoric expression suddenly announced itself fail to recognize it as divine? It is not strange that he repeats it on the page next the one where we first see it. Not having any golden letters to print it in, I will underscore it for italics, and doubly underscore it in the second extract for small capitals:–

“Now that is the wisdom of a man, in every instance of his labor, to _hitch his wagon to a star_, and see his chore done by the gods themselves.”–

“‘It was a great instruction,’ said a saint in Cromwell’s war, ‘that the best courages are but beams of the Almighty.’ HITCH YOUR WAGON TO A STAR. Let us not fag in paltry works which serve our pot and bag alone. Let us not lie and steal. No god will help. We shall find all their teams going the other way,–Charles’s Wain, Great Bear, Orion, Leo, Hercules: every god will leave us. Work rather for those interests which the divinities honor and promote,–justice, love, freedom, knowledge, utility.”–

Charles’s Wain and the Great Bear, he should have been reminded, are the same constellation; the _Dipper_ is what our people often call it, and the country folk all know “the pinters,” which guide their eyes to the North Star.

I find in the Essay on “Art” many of the thoughts with which we are familiar in Emerson’s poem, “The Problem.” It will be enough to cite these passages:–

“We feel in seeing a noble building which rhymes well, as we do in hearing a perfect song, that it is spiritually organic; that it had a necessity in nature for being; was one of the possible forms in the Divine mind, and is now only discovered and executed by the artist, not arbitrarily composed by him. And so every genuine work of art has as much reason for being as the earth and the sun.–

–“The Iliad of Homer, the songs of David, the odes of Pindar, the tragedies of Aeschylus, the Doric temples, the Gothic cathedrals, the plays of Shakspeare, all and each were made not for sport, but in grave earnest, in tears and smiles of suffering and loving men.–

–“The Gothic cathedrals were built when the builder and the priest and the people were overpowered by their faith. Love and fear laid every stone.–

“Our arts are happy hits. We are like the musician on the lake, whose melody is sweeter than he knows.”

The discourse on “Eloquence” is more systematic, more professorial, than many of the others. A few brief extracts will give the key to its general purport:–

“Eloquence must be grounded on the plainest narrative. Afterwards, it may warm itself until it exhales symbols of every kind and color, speaks only through the most poetic forms; but, first and last, it must still be at bottom a biblical statement of fact.–

“He who will train himself to mastery in this science of persuasion must lay the emphasis of education, not on popular arts, but on character and insight.–

–“The highest platform of eloquence is the moral sentiment.–

–“Its great masters … were grave men, who preferred their integrity to their talent, and esteemed that object for which they toiled, whether the prosperity of their country, or the laws, or a reformation, or liberty of speech, or of the press, or letters, or morals, as above the whole world and themselves also.”

“Domestic Life” begins with a picture of childhood so charming that it sweetens all the good counsel which follows like honey round the rim of the goblet which holds some tonic draught:–

“Welcome to the parents the puny struggler, strong in his weakness, his little arms more irresistible than the soldier’s, his lips touched with persuasion which Chatham and Pericles in manhood had not. His unaffected lamentations when he lifts up his voice on high, or, more beautiful, the sobbing child,–the face all liquid grief, as he tries to swallow his vexation,–soften all hearts to pity, and to mirthful and clamorous compassion. The small despot asks so little that all reason and all nature are on his side. His ignorance is more charming than all knowledge, and his little sins more bewitching than any virtue. His flesh is angels’ flesh, all alive.–All day, between his three or four sleeps, he coos like a pigeon-house, sputters and spurs and puts on his faces of importance; and when he fasts, the little Pharisee fails not to sound his trumpet before him.”

Emerson has favored his audiences and readers with what he knew about “Farming.” Dr. Emerson tells me that this discourse was read as an address before the “Middlesex Agricultural Society,” and printed in the “Transactions” of that association. He soon found out that the hoe and the spade were not the tools he was meant to work with, but he had some general ideas about farming which he expressed very happily:–

“The farmer’s office is precise and important, but you must not try to paint him in rose-color; you cannot make pretty compliments to fate and gravitation, whose minister he is.–This hard work will always be done by one kind of man; not by scheming speculators, nor by soldiers, nor professors, nor readers of Tennyson; but by men of endurance, deep-chested, long-winded, tough, slow and sure, and timely.”

Emerson’s chemistry and physiology are not profound, but they are correct enough to make a fine richly colored poetical picture in his imaginative presentation. He tells the commonest facts so as to make them almost a surprise:–

“By drainage we went down to a subsoil we did not know, and have found there is a Concord under old Concord, which we are now getting the best crops from; a Middlesex under Middlesex; and, in fine, that Massachusetts has a basement story more valuable and that promises to pay a better rent than all the superstructure.”

In “Works and Days” there is much good reading, but I will call attention to one or two points only, as having a slight special interest of their own. The first is the boldness of Emerson’s assertions and predictions in matters belonging to science and art. Thus, he speaks of “the transfusion of the blood,–which, in Paris, it was claimed, enables a man to change his blood as often as his linen!” And once more,

“We are to have the balloon yet, and the next war will be fought in the air.”

Possibly; but it is perhaps as safe to predict that it will be fought on wheels; the soldiers on bicycles, the officers on tricycles.

The other point I have marked is that we find in this Essay a prose version of the fine poem, printed in “May-Day” under the title “Days.” I shall refer to this more particularly hereafter.

It is wronging the Essay on “Books” to make extracts from it. It is all an extract, taken from years of thought in the lonely study and the public libraries. If I commit the wrong I have spoken of, it is under protest against myself. Every word of this Essay deserves careful reading. But here are a few sentences I have selected for the reader’s consideration:–

“There are books; and it is practicable to read them because they are so few.–

“I visit occasionally the Cambridge Library, and I can seldom go there without renewing the conviction that the best of it all is already within the four walls of my study at home.–

“The three practical rules which I have to offer are, 1. Never read any book that is not a year old. 2. Never read any but famed books. 3. Never read any but what you like, or, in Shakspeare’s phrase,–

“‘No profit goes where is no pleasure ta’en; In brief, Sir, study what you most affect.'”

Emerson has a good deal to say about conversation in his Essay on “Clubs,” but nothing very notable on the special subject of the Essay. Perhaps his diary would have something of interest with reference to the “Saturday Club,” of which he was a member, which, in fact, formed itself around him as a nucleus, and which he attended very regularly. But he was not given to personalities, and among the men of genius and of talent whom he met there no one was quieter, but none saw and heard and remembered more. He was hardly what Dr. Johnson would have called a “clubable” man, yet he enjoyed the meetings in his still way, or he would never have come from Concord so regularly to attend them. He gives two good reasons for the existence of a club like that of which I have been speaking:–

“I need only hint the value of the club for bringing masters in their several arts to compare and expand their views, to come to an understanding on these points, and so that their united opinion shall have its just influence on public questions of education and politics.”

“A principal purpose also is the hospitality of the club, as a means of receiving a worthy foreigner with mutual advantage.”

I do not think “public questions of education and politics” were very prominent at the social meetings of the “Saturday Club,” but “worthy foreigners,” and now and then one not so worthy, added variety to the meetings of the company, which included a wide range of talents and callings.

All that Emerson has to say about “Courage” is worth listening to, for he was a truly brave man in that sphere of action where there are more cowards than are found in the battle-field. He spoke his convictions fearlessly; he carried the spear of Ithuriel, but he wore no breastplate save that which protects him

“Whose armor is his honest thought,
And simple truth his utmost skill.”

He mentions three qualities as attracting the wonder and reverence of mankind: 1. Disinterestedness; 2. Practical Power; 3. Courage. “I need not show how much it is esteemed, for the people give it the first rank. They forgive everything to it. And any man who puts his life in peril in a cause which is esteemed becomes the darling of all men.”–There are good and inspiriting lessons for young and old in this Essay or Lecture, which closes with the spirited ballad of “George Nidiver,” written “by a lady to whom all the particulars of the fact are exactly known.”

Men will read any essay or listen to any lecture which has for its subject, like the one now before me, “Success.” Emerson complains of the same things in America which Carlyle groaned over in England:–

“We countenance each other in this life of show, puffing advertisement, and manufacture of public opinion; and excellence is lost sight of in the hunger for sudden performance and praise.–

“Now, though I am by no means sure that the reader will assent to all my propositions, yet I think we shall agree in my first rule for success,–that we shall drop the brag and the advertisement and take Michael Angelo’s course, ‘to confide in one’s self and be something of worth and value.'”

Reading about “Success” is after all very much like reading in old books of alchemy. “How not to do it,” is the lesson of all the books and treatises. Geber and Albertus Magnus, Roger Bacon and Raymond Lully, and the whole crew of “pauperes alcumistae,” all give the most elaborate directions showing their student how to fail in transmuting Saturn into Luna and Sol and making a billionaire of himself. “Success” in its vulgar sense,–the gaining of money and position,–is not to be reached by following the rules of an instructor. Our “self-made men,” who govern the country by their wealth and influence, have found their place by adapting themselves to the particular circumstances in which they were placed, and not by studying the broad maxims of “Poor Richard,” or any other moralist or economist.–For such as these is meant the cheap cynical saying quoted by Emerson, “_Rien ne reussit mieux que le succes_.”

But this is not the aim and end of Emerson’s teaching:–

“I fear the popular notion of success stands in direct opposition in all points to the real and wholesome success. One adores public opinion, the other private opinion; one fame, the other desert; one feats, the other humility; one lucre, the other love; one monopoly, and the other hospitality of mind.”

And so, though there is no alchemy in this Lecture, it is profitable reading, assigning its true value to the sterling gold of character, the gaining of which is true success, as against the brazen idol of the market-place.

The Essay on “Old Age” has a special value from its containing two personal reminiscences: one of the venerable Josiah Quincy, a brief mention; the other the detailed record of a visit in the year 1825, Emerson being then twenty-two years old, to ex-President John Adams, soon after the election of his son to the Presidency. It is enough to allude to these, which every reader will naturally turn to first of all.

But many thoughts worth gathering are dropped along these pages. He recounts the benefits of age; the perilous capes and shoals it has weathered; the fact that a success more or less signifies little, so that the old man may go below his own mark with impunity; the feeling that he has found expression,–that his condition, in particular and in general, allows the utterance of his mind; the pleasure of completing his secular affairs, leaving all in the best posture for the future:–

“When life has been well spent, age is a loss of what it can well spare, muscular strength, organic instincts, gross bulk, and works that belong to these. But the central wisdom which was old in infancy is young in fourscore years, and dropping off obstructions, leaves in happy subjects the mind purified and wise. I have heard that whoever loves is in no condition old. I have heard that whenever the name of man is spoken, the doctrine of immortality is announced; it cleaves to his constitution. The mode of it baffles our wit, and no whisper comes to us from the other side. But the inference from the working of intellect, hiving knowledge, hiving skill,–at the end of life just ready to be born,–affirms the inspirations of affection and of the moral sentiment.”

Other literary labors of Emerson during this period were the Introduction to “Plutarch’s Morals” in 1870, and a Preface to William Ellery Channing’s Poem, “The Wanderer,” in 1871. He made a speech at Howard University, Washington, in 1872.

In the year 1871 Emerson made a visit to California with a very pleasant company, concerning which Mr. John M. Forbes, one of whose sons married Emerson’s daughter Edith, writes to me as follows. Professor James B. Thayer, to whom he refers, has more recently written and published an account of this trip, from which some extracts will follow Mr. Forbes’s letter:–

BOSTON, February 6, 1884.

MY DEAR DR.,–What little I can give will be of a very rambling character.

One of the first memories of Emerson which comes up is my meeting him on the steamboat at returning from Detroit East. I persuaded him to stop over at Niagara, which he had never seen. We took a carriage and drove around the circuit. It was in early summer, perhaps in 1848 or 1849. When we came to Table Rock on the British side, our driver took us down on the outer part of the rock in the carriage. We passed on by rail, and the next day’s papers brought us the telegraphic news that Table Rock had fallen over; perhaps we were among the last persons on it!

About 1871 I made up a party for California, including Mr. Emerson, his daughter Edith, and a number of gay young people. We drove with B—-, the famous Vermont coachman, up to the Geysers, and then made the journey to the Yosemite Valley by wagon and on horseback. I wish I could give you more than a mere outline picture of the sage at this time. With the thermometer at 100 degrees he would sometimes drive with the buffalo robes drawn up over his knees, apparently indifferent to the weather, gazing on the new and grand scenes of mountain and valley through which we journeyed. I especially remember once, when riding down the steep side of a mountain, his reins hanging loose, the bit entirely out of the horse’s mouth, without his being aware that this was an unusual method of riding Pegasus, so fixed was his gaze into space, and so unconscious was he, at the moment, of his surroundings.

In San Francisco he visited with us the dens of the opium smokers, in damp cellars, with rows of shelves around, on which were deposited the stupefied Mongolians; perhaps the lowest haunts of humanity to be found in the world. The contrast between them and the serene eye and undisturbed brow of the sage was a sight for all beholders.

When we reached Salt Lake City on our way home he made a point of calling on Brigham Young, then at the summit of his power. The Prophet, or whatever he was called, was a burly, bull-necked man of hard sense, really leading a great industrial army. He did not seem to appreciate who his visitor was, at any rate gave no sign of so doing, and the chief interest of the scene was the wide contrast between these leaders of spiritual and of material forces.

I regret not having kept any notes of what was said on this and other occasions, but if by chance you could get hold of Professor J.B. Thayer, who was one of our party, he could no doubt give you some notes that would be valuable.

Perhaps the latest picture that remains in my mind of our friend is his wandering along the beaches and under the trees at Naushon, no doubt carrying home large stealings from my domain there, which lost none of their value from being transferred to his pages. Next to his private readings which he gave us there, the most notable recollection is that of his intense amusement at some comical songs which our young people used to sing, developing a sense of humor which a superficial observer would hardly have discovered, but which you and I know he possessed in a marked degree.

Yours always,

J.M. FORBES.

Professor James B. Thayer’s little book, “A Western Journey with Mr. Emerson,” is a very entertaining account of the same trip concerning which Mr. Forbes wrote the letter just given. Professor Thayer kindly read many of his notes to me before his account was published, and allows me to make such use of the book as I see fit. Such liberty must not be abused, and I will content myself with a few passages in which Emerson has a part. No extract will interest the reader more than the following:–

“‘How _can_ Mr. Emerson,’ said one of the younger members of the party to me that day, ‘be so agreeable, all the time, without getting tired!’ It was the _naive_ expression of what we all had felt. There was never a more agreeable travelling companion; he was always accessible, cheerful, sympathetic, considerate, tolerant; and there was always that same respectful interest in those with whom he talked, even the humblest, which raised them in their own estimation. One thing particularly impressed me,–the sense that he seemed to have of a certain great amplitude of time and leisure. It was the behavior of one who really _believed_ in an immortal life, and had adjusted his conduct accordingly; so that, beautiful and grand as the natural objects were, among which our journey lay, they were matched by the sweet elevation of character, and the spiritual charm of our gracious friend. Years afterwards, on that memorable day of his funeral at Concord, I found that a sentence from his own Essay on Immortality haunted my mind, and kept repeating itself all the day long; it seemed to point to the sources of his power: ‘Meantime the true disciples saw through the letter the doctrine of eternity, which dissolved the poor corpse, and Nature also, and gave grandeur to the passing hour.'”

This extract will be appropriately followed by another alluding to the same subject.

“The next evening, Sunday, the twenty-third, Mr. Emerson read his address on ‘Immortality,’ at Dr. Stebbins’s church. It was the first time that he had spoken on the Western coast; never did he speak better. It was, in the main, the same noble Essay that has since been printed.

“At breakfast the next morning we had the newspaper, the ‘Alta California.’ It gave a meagre outline of the address, but praised it warmly, and closed with the following observations: ‘All left the church feeling that an elegant tribute had been paid to the creative genius of the Great First Cause, and that a masterly use of the English language had contributed to that end.'”

The story used to be told that after the Reverend Horace Holley had delivered a prayer on some public occasion, Major Ben. Russell, of ruddy face and ruffled shirt memory, Editor of “The Columbian Centinel,” spoke of it in his paper the next day as “the most eloquent prayer ever addressed to a Boston audience.”

The “Alta California’s” “elegant tribute” is not quite up to this rhetorical altitude.

“‘The minister,’ said he, ‘is in no danger of losing his position; he represents the moral sense and the humanities.’ He spoke of his own reasons for leaving the pulpit, and added that ‘some one had lately come to him whose conscience troubled him about retaining the name of Christian; he had replied that he himself had no difficulty about it. When he was called a Platonist, or a Christian, or a Republican, he welcomed it. It did not bind him to what he did not like. What is the use of going about and setting up a flag of negation?'”

“I made bold to ask him what he had in mind in naming his recent course of lectures at Cambridge, ‘The Natural History of the Intellect.’ This opened a very interesting conversation; but, alas! I could recall but little of it,–little more than the mere hintings of what he said. He cared very little for metaphysics. But he thought that as a man grows he observes certain facts about his own mind,–about memory, for example. These he had set down from time to time. As for making any methodical history, he did not undertake it.”

Emerson met Brigham Young at Salt Lake City, as has been mentioned, but neither seems to have made much impression upon the other. Emerson spoke of the Mormons. Some one had said, “They impress the common people, through their imagination, by Bible-names and imagery.” “Yes,” he said, “it is an after-clap of Puritanism. But one would think that after this Father Abraham could go no further.”

The charm of Boswell’s Life of Johnson is that it not merely records his admirable conversation, but also gives us many of those lesser peculiarities which are as necessary to a true biography as lights and shades to a portrait on canvas. We are much obliged to Professor Thayer therefore for the two following pleasant recollections which he has been good-natured enough to preserve for us, and with which we will take leave of his agreeable little volume:–

“At breakfast we had, among other things, pie. This article at breakfast was one of Mr. Emerson’s weaknesses. A pie stood before him now. He offered to help somebody from it, who declined; and then one or two others, who also declined; and then Mr.—-; he too declined. ‘But Mr.—-!’ Mr. Emerson remonstrated, with humorous emphasis, thrusting the knife under a piece of the pie, and putting the entire weight of his character into his manner,–‘but Mr.—-, _what is pie for_?'”

A near friend of mine, a lady, was once in the cars with Emerson, and when they stopped for the refreshment of the passengers he was very desirous of procuring something at the station for her solace. Presently he advanced upon her with a cup of tea in one hand and a wedge of pie in the other,–such a wedge! She could hardly have been more dismayed if one of Caesar’s _cunei_, or wedges of soldiers, had made a charge against her.

Yet let me say here that pie, often foolishly abused, is a good creature, at the right time and in angles of thirty or forty degrees. In semicircles and quadrants it may sometimes prove too much for delicate stomachs. But here was Emerson, a hopelessly confirmed pie-eater, never, so far as I remember, complaining of dyspepsia; and there, on the other side, was Carlyle, feeding largely on wholesome oatmeal, groaning with indigestion all his days, and living with half his self-consciousness habitually centred beneath his diaphragm.

Like his friend Carlyle and like Tennyson, Emerson had a liking for a whiff of tobacco-smoke:–

“When alone,” he said, “he rarely cared to finish a whole cigar. But in company it was singular to see how different it was. To one who found it difficult to meet people, as he did, the effect of a cigar was agreeable; one who is smoking may be as silent as he likes, and yet be good company. And so Hawthorne used to say that he found it. On this journey Mr. Emerson generally smoked a single cigar after our mid-day dinner, or after tea, and occasionally after both. This was multiplying, several times over, anything that was usual with him at home.”

Professor Thayer adds in a note:–

“Like Milton, Mr. Emerson ‘was extraordinary temperate in his Diet,’ and he used even less tobacco. Milton’s quiet day seems to have closed regularly with a pipe; he ‘supped,’ we are told, ‘upon … some light thing; and after a pipe of tobacco and a glass of water went to bed.'”

As Emerson’s name has been connected with that of Milton in its nobler aspects, it can do no harm to contemplate him, like Milton, indulging in this semi-philosophical luxury.

One morning in July, 1872, Mr. and Mrs. Emerson woke to find their room filled with smoke and fire coming through the floor of a closet in the room over them. The alarm was given, and the neighbors gathered and did their best to put out the flames, but the upper part of the house was destroyed, and with it were burned many papers of value to Emerson, including his father’s sermons. Emerson got wet and chilled, and it seems too probable that the shock hastened that gradual loss of memory which came over his declining years.

His kind neighbors did all they could to save his property and relieve his temporary needs. A study was made ready for him in the old Court House, and the “Old Manse,” which had sheltered his grandfather, and others nearest to him, received him once more as its tenant.

On the 15th of October he spoke at a dinner given in New York in honor of James Anthony Froude, the historian, and in the course of this same month he set out on his third visit to Europe, accompanied by his daughter Ellen. We have little to record of this visit, which was suggested as a relief and recreation while his home was being refitted for him. He went to Egypt, but so far as I have learned the Sphinx had no message for him, and in the state of mind in which he found himself upon the mysterious and dream-compelling Nile it may be suspected that the landscape with its palms and pyramids was an unreal vision,–that, as to his Humble-bee,

“All was picture as he passed.”

But while he was voyaging his friends had not forgotten him. The sympathy with him in his misfortune was general and profound. It did not confine itself to expressions of feeling, but a spontaneous movement organized itself almost without effort. If any such had been needed, the attached friend whose name is appended to the Address to the Subscribers to the Fund for rebuilding Mr. Emerson’s house would have been as energetic in this new cause as he had been in the matter of procuring the reprint of “Sartor Resartus.” I have his kind permission to publish the whole correspondence relating to the friendly project so happily carried out.

_To the Subscribers to the Fund for the Rebuilding of Mr. Emerson’s House, after the Fire of July_ 24, 1872:

The death of Mr. Emerson has removed any objection which may have before existed to the printing of the following correspondence. I have now caused this to be done, that each subscriber may have the satisfaction of possessing a copy of the touching and affectionate letters in which he expressed his delight in this, to him, most unexpected demonstration of personal regard and attachment, in the offer to restore for him his ruined home.

No enterprise of the kind was ever more fortunate and successful in its purpose and in its results. The prompt and cordial response to the proposed subscription was most gratifying. No contribution was solicited from any one. The simple suggestion to a few friends of Mr. Emerson that an opportunity was now offered to be of service to him was all that was needed. From the first day on which it was made, the day after the fire, letters began to come in, with cheques for large and small amounts, so that in less than three weeks I was enabled to send to Judge Hoar the sum named in his letter as received by him on the 13th of August, and presented by him to Mr. Emerson the next morning, at the Old Manse, with fitting words.

Other subscriptions were afterwards received, increasing the amount on my book to eleven thousand six hundred and twenty dollars. A part of this was handed directly to the builder at Concord. The balance was sent to Mr. Emerson October 7, and acknowledged by him in his letter of October 8, 1872.

All the friends of Mr. Emerson who knew of the plan which was proposed to rebuild his house, seemed to feel that it was a privilege to be allowed to express in this way the love and veneration with which he was regarded, and the deep debt of gratitude which they owed to him, and there is no doubt that a much larger amount would have been readily and gladly offered, if it had been required, for the object in view.

Those who have had the happiness to join in this friendly “conspiracy” may well take pleasure in the thought that what they have done has had the effect to lighten the load of care and anxiety which the calamity of the fire brought with it to Mr. Emerson, and thus perhaps to prolong for some precious years the serene and noble life that was so dear to all of us.

My thanks are due to the friends who have made me the bearer of this message of good-will.

LE BARON RUSSELL.

BOSTON, May 8, 1882.

BOSTON, August 13, 1872.

DEAR MR. EMERSON:

It seems to have been the spontaneous desire of your friends, on hearing of the burning of your house, to be allowed the pleasure of rebuilding it.

A few of them have united for this object, and now request your acceptance of the amount which I have to-day deposited to your order at the Concord Bank, through the kindness of our friend, Judge Hoar. They trust that you will receive it as an expression of sincere regard and affection from friends, who will, one and all, esteem it a great privilege to be permitted to assist in the restoration of your home.

And if, in their eagerness to participate in so grateful a work, they may have exceeded the estimate of your architect as to what is required for that purpose, they beg that you will devote the remainder to such other objects as may be most convenient to you.

Very sincerely yours,

LE BARON RUSSELL.

CONCORD, August 14, 1872.

DR. LE B. RUSSELL:

_Dear Sir_,–I received your letters, with the check for ten thousand dollars inclosed, from Mr. Barrett last evening. This morning I deposited it to Mr. Emerson’s credit in the Concord National Bank, and took a bank book for him, with his little balance entered at the top, and this following, and carried it to him with your letter. I told him, by way of prelude, that some of his friends had made him treasurer of an association who wished him to go to England and examine Warwick Castle and other noted houses that had been recently injured by fire, in order to get the best ideas possible for restoration, and then to apply them to a house which the association was formed to restore in this neighborhood.

When he understood the thing and had read your letter, he seemed very deeply moved. He said that he had been allowed so far in life to stand on his own feet, and that he hardly knew what to say,–that the kindness of his friends was very great. I said what I thought was best in reply, and told him that this was the spontaneous act of friends, who wished the privilege of expressing in this way their respect and affection, and was done only by those who thought it a privilege to do so. I mentioned Hillard as you desired, and also Mrs. Tappan, who, it seems, had written to him and offered any assistance he might need, to the extent of five thousand dollars, personally.

I think it is all right, but he said he must see the list of contributors, and would then say what he had to say about it. He told me that Mr. F.C. Lowell, who was his classmate and old friend, Mr. Bangs, Mrs. Gurney, and a few other friends, had already sent him five thousand dollars, which he seemed to think was as much as he could bear. This makes the whole a very gratifying result, and perhaps explains the absence of some names on your book.

I am glad that Mr. Emerson, who is feeble and ill, can learn what a debt of obligation his friends feel to him, and thank you heartily for what you have done about it. Very truly yours,

E.R. HOAR.

CONCORD, August 16, 1872.

MY DEAR LE BARON:

I have wondered and melted over your letter and its accompaniments till it is high time that I should reply to it, if I can. My misfortunes, as I have lived along so far in this world, have been so few that I have never needed to ask direct aid of the host of good men and women who have cheered my life, though many a gift has come to me. And this late calamity, however rude and devastating, soon began to look more wonderful in its salvages than in its ruins, so that I can hardly feel any right to this munificent endowment with which you, and my other friends through you, have astonished me. But I cannot read your letter or think of its message without delight, that my companions and friends bear me so noble a good-will, nor without some new aspirations in the old heart toward a better deserving. Judge Hoar has, up to this time, withheld from me the names of my benefactors, but you may be sure that I shall not rest till I have learned them, every one, to repeat to myself at night and at morning.

Your affectionate friend and debtor,

R.W. EMERSON.

DR. LE BARON RUSSELL

CONCORD, October 8, 1872.

MY DEAR DOCTOR LE BARON:

I received last night your two notes, and the cheque, enclosed in one of them, for one thousand and twenty dollars.

Are my friends bent on killing me with kindness? No, you will say, but to make me live longer. I thought myself sufficiently loaded with benefits already, and you add more and more. It appears that you all will rebuild my house and rejuvenate me by sending me in my old days abroad on a young man’s excursion.

I am a lover of men, but this recent wonderful experience of their tenderness surprises and occupies my thoughts day by day. Now that I have all or almost all the names of the men and women who have conspired in this kindness to me (some of whom I have never personally known), I please myself with the thought of meeting each and asking, Why have we not met before? Why have you not told me that we thought alike? Life is not so long, nor sympathy of thought so common, that we can spare the society of those with whom we best agree. Well, ’tis probably my own fault by sticking ever to my solitude. Perhaps it is not too late to learn of these friends a better lesson.

Thank them for me whenever you meet them, and say to them that I am not wood or stone, if I have not yet trusted myself so far as to go to each one of them directly.

My wife insists that I shall also send her acknowledgments to them and you.

Yours and theirs affectionately,

R.W. EMERSON.

DR. LE BARON KUSSELL.

The following are the names of the subscribers to the fund for rebuilding Mr. Emerson’s house:–

Mrs. Anne S. Hooper.
Miss Alice S. Hooper.
Mrs. Caroline Tappan.
Miss Ellen S. Tappan.
Miss Mary A. Tappan.
Mr. T.G. Appleton.
Mrs. Henry Edwards.
Miss Susan E. Dorr.
Misses Wigglesworth.
Mr. Edward Wigglesworth.
Mr. J. Elliot Cabot.
Mrs. Sarah S. Russell.
Friends in New York and Philadelphia, through Mr. Williams. Mr. William Whiting.
Mr. Frederick Beck.
Mr. H.P. Kidder.
Mrs. Abel Adams.
Mrs. George Faulkner.
Hon. E.R. Hoar.
Mr. James B. Thayer.
Mr. John M. Forbes.
Mr. James H. Beal.
Mrs. Anna C. Lodge.
Mr. T. Jefferson Coolidge.
Mr. H.H. Hunnewell.
Mrs. S. Cabot.
Mr. James A. Dupee.
Mrs. Anna C. Lowell.
Mrs. M.F. Sayles.
Miss Helen L. Appleton.
J.R. Osgood & Co.
Mr. Richard Soule.
Mr. Francis Geo. Shaw.
Dr. R.W. Hooper.
Mr. William P. Mason.
Mr. William Gray.
Mr. Sam’l G. Ward.
Mr. J.I. Bowditch.
Mr. Geo. C. Ward.
Mrs. Luicia J. Briggs.
Mr. John E. Williams.
Dr. Le Baron Russell.

In May, 1873, Emerson returned to Concord. His friends and fellow-citizens received him with every token of affection and reverence. A set of signals was arranged to announce his arrival. Carriages were in readiness for him and his family, a band greeted him with music, and passing under a triumphal arch, he was driven to his renewed old home amidst the welcomes and the blessings of his loving and admiring friends and neighbors.

CHAPTER XII.

1873-1878. AET. 70-75.

Publication of “Parnassus.”–Emerson Nominated as Candidate for the Office of Lord Rector of Glasgow University.–Publication of “Letters and Social Aims.” Contents: Poetry and Imagination.–Social Aims.–Eloquence.–Resources.–The Comic.–Quotation and Originality.–Progress of Culture.–Persian Poetry.–Inspiration.– Greatness.–Immortality.–Address at the Unveiling of the Statue of “The Minute-Man” at Concord.–Publication of Collected Poems.

In December, 1874, Emerson published “Parnassus,” a Collection of Poems by British and American authors. Many readers may like to see his subdivisions and arrangement of the pieces he has brought together. They are as follows: “Nature.”–“Human Life.”–“Intellectual.” –“Contemplation.”–“Moral and Religious.”–“Heroic.”–“Personal.” –“Pictures.”–“Narrative Poems and Ballads.”–“Songs.”–“Dirges and Pathetic Poems.”–“Comic and Humorous.”–“Poetry of Terror.”–“Oracles and Counsels.”

I have borrowed so sparingly from the rich mine of Mr. George Willis Cooke’s “Ralph Waldo Emerson, His Life, Writings, and Philosophy,” that I am pleased to pay him the respectful tribute of taking a leaf from his excellent work.

“This collection,” he says,

“was the result of his habit, pursued for many years, of copying into his commonplace book any poem which specially pleased him. Many of these favorites had been read to illustrate his lectures on the English poets. The book has no worthless selections, almost everything it contains bearing the stamp of genius and worth. Yet Emerson’s personality is seen in its many intellectual and serious poems, and in the small number of its purely religious selections. With two or three exceptions he copies none of those devotional poems which have attracted devout souls.–His poetical sympathies are shown in the fact that one third of the selections are from the seventeenth century. Shakespeare is drawn on more largely than any other, no less than eighty-eight selections being made from him. The names of George Herbert, Herrick, Ben Jonson, and Milton frequently appear. Wordsworth appears forty-three times, and stands next to Shakespeare; while Burns, Byron, Scott, Tennyson, and Chaucer make up the list of favorites. Many little known pieces are included, and some whose merit is other than poetical.–This selection of poems is eminently that of a poet of keen intellectual tastes. I not popular in character, omitting many public favorites, and introducing very much which can never be acceptable to the general reader. The Preface is full of interest for its comments on many of the poems and poets appearing in these selections.”

I will only add to Mr. Cooke’s criticism these two remarks: First, that I have found it impossible to know under which of his divisions to look for many of the poems I was in search of; and as, in the earlier copies at least, there was no paged index where each author’s pieces were collected together, one had to hunt up his fragments with no little loss of time and patience, under various heads, “imitating the careful search that Isis made for the mangled body of Osiris.” The other remark is that each one of Emerson’s American fellow-poets from whom he has quoted would gladly have spared almost any of the extracts from the poems of his brother-bards, if the editor would only have favored us with some specimens of his own poetry, with a single line of which he has not seen fit to indulge us.

In 1874 Emerson received the nomination by the independent party among the students of Glasgow University for the office of Lord Rector. He received five hundred votes against seven hundred for Disraeli, who was elected. He says in a letter to Dr. J. Hutchinson Sterling:–

“I count that vote as quite the fairest laurel that has ever fallen on me; and I cannot but feel deeply grateful to my young friends in the University, and to yourself, who have been my counsellor and my too partial advocate.”

Mr. Cabot informs us in his Prefatory Note to “Letters and Social Aims,” that the proof sheets of this volume, now forming the eighth of the collected works, showed even before the burning of his house and the illness which followed from the shock, that his loss of memory and of mental grasp was such as to make it unlikely that he would in any case have been able to accomplish what he had undertaken. Sentences, even whole pages, were repeated, and there was a want of order beyond what even he would have tolerated:–

“There is nothing here that he did not write, and he gave his full approval to whatever was done in the way of selection and arrangement; but I cannot say that he applied his mind very closely to the matter.”

This volume contains eleven Essays, the subjects of which, as just enumerated, are very various. The longest and most elaborate paper is that entitled “Poetry and Imagination.” I have room for little more than the enumeration of the different headings of this long Essay. By these it will be seen how wide a ground it covers. They are “Introductory;” “Poetry;” “Imagination;” “Veracity;” “Creation;” “Melody, Rhythm, Form;” “Bards and Trouveurs;” “Morals;” “Transcendency.” Many thoughts with which we are familiar are reproduced, expanded, and illustrated in this Essay. Unity in multiplicity, the symbolism of nature, and others of his leading ideas appear in new phrases, not unwelcome, for they look fresh in every restatement. It would be easy to select a score of pointed sayings, striking images, large generalizations. Some of these we find repeated in his verse. Thus:–

“Michael Angelo is largely filled with the Creator that made and makes men. How much of the original craft remains in him, and he a mortal man!”

And so in the well remembered lines of “The Problem”:–

“Himself from God he could not free.”

“He knows that he did not make his thought,–no, his thought made him, and made the sun and stars.”

“Art might obey but not surpass.
The passive Master lent his hand
To the vast soul that o’er him planned.”

Hope is at the bottom of every Essay of Emerson’s as it was at the bottom of Pandora’s box:–

“I never doubt the riches of nature, the gifts of the future, the immense wealth of the mind. O yes, poets we shall have, mythology, symbols, religion of our own.

–“Sooner or later that which is now life shall be poetry, and every fair and manly trait shall add a richer strain to the song.”

Under the title “Social Aims” he gives some wise counsel concerning manners and conversation. One of these precepts will serve as a specimen–if we have met with it before it is none the worse for wear:–

“Shun the negative side. Never worry people with; your contritions, nor with dismal views of politics or society. Never name sickness; even if you could trust yourself on that perilous topic, beware of unmuzzling a valetudinarian, who will give you enough of it.”

We have had one Essay on “Eloquence” already. One extract from this new discourse on the same subject must serve our turn:–

“These are ascending stairs,–a good voice, winning manners, plain speech, chastened, however, by the schools into correctness; but we must come to the main matter, of power of statement,–know your fact; hug your fact. For the essential thing is heat, and heat comes of sincerity. Speak what you know and believe; and are personally in it; and are answerable for every word. Eloquence is _the power to_ _translate a truth into language perfectly intelligible to the person to whom you speak_.”

The italics are Emerson’s.

If our learned and excellent John Cotton used to sweeten his mouth before going to bed with a bit of Calvin, we may as wisely sweeten and strengthen our sense of existence with a morsel or two from Emerson’s Essay on “Resources”:–

“A Schopenhauer, with logic and learning and wit, teaching pessimism,–teaching that this is the worst of all possible worlds, and inferring that sleep is better than waking, and death than sleep,–all the talent in the world cannot save him from being odious. But if instead of these negatives you give me affirmatives; if you tell me that there is always life for the living; that what man has done man can do; that this world belongs to the energetic; that there is always a way to everything desirable; that every man is provided, in the new bias of his faculty, with a key to nature, and that man only rightly knows himself as far as he has experimented on things,–I am invigorated, put into genial and working temper; the horizon opens, and we are full of good-will and gratitude to the Cause of Causes.”

The Essay or Lecture on “The Comic” may have formed a part of a series he had contemplated on the intellectual processes. Two or three sayings in it will show his view sufficiently:–

“The essence of all jokes, of all comedy, seems to be an honest or well-intended halfness; a non-performance of what is pretended to be performed, at the same time that one is giving loud pledges of performance.

“If the essence of the Comic be the contrast in the intellect between the idea and the false performance, there is good reason why we should be affected by the exposure. We have no deeper interest than our integrity, and that we should be made aware by joke and by stroke of any lie we entertain. Besides, a perception of the comic seems to be a balance-wheel in our metaphysical structure. It appears to be an essential element in a fine character.–A rogue alive to the ludicrous is still convertible. If that sense is lost, his fellow-men can do little for him.”

These and other sayings of like purport are illustrated by well-preserved stories and anecdotes not for the most part of very recent date.

“Quotation and Originality” furnishes the key to Emerson’s workshop. He believed in quotation, and borrowed from everybody and every book. Not in any stealthy or shame-faced way, but proudly, royally, as a king borrows from one of his attendants the coin that bears his own image and superscription.

“All minds quote. Old and new make the warp and woof of every moment. There is no thread that is not a twist of these two strands.–We quote not only books and proverbs, but arts, sciences, religion, customs, and laws; nay, we quote temples and houses, tables and chairs by imitation.–

“The borrowing is often honest enough and comes of magnanimity and stoutness. A great man quotes bravely, and will not draw on his invention when his memory serves him with a word as good.

“Next to the originator of a good sentence is the first quoter of it.”–

–“The Progress of Culture,” his second Phi Beta Kappa oration, has already been mentioned.

–The lesson of self-reliance, which he is never tired of inculcating, is repeated and enforced in the Essay on “Greatness.”

“There are certain points of identity in which these masters agree. Self-respect is the early form in which greatness appears.–Stick to your own; don’t inculpate yourself in the local, social, or national crime, but follow the path your genius traces like the galaxy of heaven for you to walk in.

“Every mind has a new compass, a new direction of its own, differencing its genius and aim from every other mind.–We call this specialty the _bias_ of each individual. And none of us will ever accomplish anything excellent or commanding except when he listens to this whisper which is heard by him alone.”

If to follow this native bias is the first rule, the second is concentration.–To the bias of the individual mind must be added the most catholic receptivity for the genius of others.

“Shall I tell you the secret of the true scholar? It is this: Every man I meet is my master in some point, and in that I learn of him.”–

“The man whom we have not seen, in whom no regard of self degraded the adorer of the laws,–who by governing himself governed others; sportive in manner, but inexorable in act; who sees longevity in his cause; whose aim is always distinct to him; who is suffered to be himself in society; who carries fate in his eye;–he it is whom we seek, encouraged in every good hour that here or hereafter he shall he found.”

What has Emerson to tell us of “Inspiration?”

“I believe that nothing great or lasting can be done except by inspiration, by leaning on the secret augury.–

“How many sources of inspiration can we count? As many as our affinities. But to a practical purpose we may reckon a few of these.”

I will enumerate them briefly as he gives them, but not attempting to reproduce his comments on each:–

1. Health. 2. The experience of writing letters. 3. The renewed sensibility which comes after seasons of decay or eclipse of the faculties. 4. The power of the will. 5. Atmospheric causes, especially the influence of morning. 6. Solitary converse with nature. 7. Solitude of itself, like that of a country inn in summer, and of a city hotel in winter. 8. Conversation. 9. New poetry; by which, he says, he means chiefly old poetry that is new to the reader.

“Every book is good to read which sets the reader in a working mood.”

What can promise more than an Essay by Emerson on “Immortality”? It is to be feared that many readers will transfer this note of interrogation to the Essay itself. What is the definite belief of Emerson as expressed in this discourse,–what does it mean? We must tack together such sentences as we can find that will stand for an answer:–

“I think all sound minds rest on a certain preliminary conviction, namely, that if it be best that conscious personal life shall continue, it will continue; if not best, then it will not; and we, if we saw the whole, should of course see that it was better so.”

This is laying the table for a Barmecide feast of nonentity, with the possibility of a real banquet to be provided for us. But he continues:–

“Schiller said, ‘What is so universal as death must be benefit.'”

He tells us what Michael Angelo said, how Plutarch felt, how Montesquieu thought about the question, and then glances off from it to the terror of the child at the thought of life without end, to the story of the two skeptical statesmen whose unsatisfied inquiry through a long course of years he holds to be a better affirmative evidence than their failure to find a confirmation was negative. He argues from our delight in permanence, from the delicate contrivances and adjustments of created things, that the contriver cannot be forever hidden, and says at last plainly:–

“Everything is prospective, and man is to live hereafter. That the world is for his education is the only sane solution of the enigma.”

But turn over a few pages and we may read:–

“I confess that everything connected with our personality fails. Nature never spares the individual; we are always balked of a complete success; no prosperity is promised to our self-esteem. We have our indemnity only in the moral and intellectual reality to which we aspire. That is immortal, and we only through that. The soul stipulates for no private good. That which is private I see not to be good. ‘If truth live, I live; if justice live, I live,’ said one of the old saints, ‘and these by any man’s suffering are enlarged and enthroned.'”

Once more we get a dissolving view of Emerson’s creed, if such a word applies to a statement like the following:–

–“I mean that I am a better believer, and all serious souls are better believers in the immortality than we can give grounds for. The real evidence is too subtle, or is higher than we can write down in propositions, and therefore Wordsworth’s ‘Ode’ is the best modern essay on the subject.”

Wordsworth’s “Ode” is a noble and beautiful dream; is it anything more? The reader who would finish this Essay, which I suspect to belong to an early period of Emerson’s development, must be prepared to plunge into mysticism and lose himself at last in an Oriental apologue. The eschatology which rests upon an English poem and an Indian fable belongs to the realm of reverie and of imagination rather than the domain of reason.

On the 19th of April, 1875, the hundredth anniversary of the “Fight at the Bridge,” Emerson delivered a short Address at the unveiling of the statue of “The Minute-Man,” erected at the place of the conflict, to commemorate the event. This is the last Address he ever wrote, though he delivered one or more after this date. From the manuscript which lies before me I extract a single passage:–

“In the year 1775 we had many enemies and many friends in England, but our one benefactor was King George the Third. The time had arrived for the political severance of America, that it might play its part in the history of this globe, and the inscrutable divine Providence gave an insane king to England. In the resistance of the Colonies, he alone was immovable on the question of force. England was so dear to us that the Colonies could only be absolutely disunited by violence from England, and only one man could compel the resort to violence. Parliament wavered, Lord North wavered, all the ministers wavered, but the king had the insanity of one idea; he was immovable, he insisted on the impossible, so the army was sent, America was instantly united, and the Nation born.”

There is certainly no mark of mental failure in this paragraph, written at a period when he had long ceased almost entirely from his literary labors.

Emerson’s collected “Poems” constitute the ninth volume of the recent collected edition of his works. They will be considered in a following chapter.

CHAPTER XIII.

1878-1882. AET. 75-79.

Last Literary Labors.–Addresses and Essays.–“Lectures and Biographical Sketches.”–“Miscellanies.”

The decline of Emerson’s working faculties went on gently and gradually, but he was not condemned to entire inactivity. His faithful daughter, Ellen, followed him with assiduous, quiet, ever watchful care, aiding his failing memory, bringing order into the chaos of his manuscript, an echo before the voice whose words it was to shape for him when his mind faltered and needed a momentary impulse.

With her helpful presence and support he ventured from time to time to read a paper before a select audience. Thus, March 30, 1878, he delivered a Lecture in the Old South Church,–“Fortune of the Republic.” On the 5th of May, 1879, he read a Lecture in the Chapel of Divinity College, Harvard University,–“The Preacher.” In 1881 he read a paper on Carlyle before the Massachusetts Historical Society.–He also published a paper in the “North American Review,” in 1878,–“The Sovereignty of Ethics,” and one on “Superlatives,” in “The Century” for February, 1882.

But in these years he was writing little or nothing. All these papers were taken from among his manuscripts of different dates. The same thing is true of the volumes published since his death; they were only compilations from his stores of unpublished matter, and their arrangement was the work of Mr. Emerson’s friend and literary executor, Mr. Cabot. These volumes cannot be considered as belonging to any single period of his literary life.

Mr. Cabot prefixes to the tenth volume of Emerson’s collected works, which bears the title, “Lectures and Biographical Sketches,” the following:–

“NOTE.

“Of the pieces included in this volume the following, namely, those from ‘The Dial,’ ‘Character,’ ‘Plutarch,’ and the biographical sketches of Dr. Ripley, of Mr. Hoar, and of Henry Thoreau, were printed by Mr. Emerson before I took any part in the arrangement of his papers. The rest, except the sketch of Miss Mary Emerson, I got ready for his use in readings to his friends, or to a limited public. He had given up the regular practice of lecturing, but would sometimes, upon special request, read a paper that had been prepared for him from his manuscripts, in the manner described in the Preface to ‘Letters and Social Aims,’–some former lecture serving as a nucleus for the new. Some of these papers he afterwards allowed to be printed; others, namely, ‘Aristocracy,’ ‘Education,’ ‘The Man of Letters,’ ‘The Scholar,’ ‘Historic Notes of Life and Letters in New England,’ ‘Mary Moody Emerson,’ are now published for the first time.”

Some of these papers I have already had occasion to refer to. From several of the others I will make one or two extracts,–a difficult task, so closely are the thoughts packed together.

From “Demonology”:–

“I say to the table-rappers

‘I will believe
Thou wilt not utter what thou dost not know,’ And so far will I trust thee, gentle Kate!”

“Meantime far be from me the impatience which cannot brook the supernatural, the vast; far be from me the lust of explaining away all which appeals to the imagination, and the great presentiments which haunt us. Willingly I too say Hail! to the unknown, awful powers which transcend the ken of the understanding.”

I will not quote anything from the Essay called “Aristocracy.” But let him who wishes to know what the word means to an American whose life has come from New England soil, whose ancestors have breathed New England air for many generations, read it, and he will find a new interpretation of a very old and often greatly wronged appellation.

“Perpetual Forces” is one of those prose poems,–of his earlier epoch, I have no doubt,–in which he plays with the facts of science with singular grace and freedom.

What man could speak more fitly, with more authority of “Character,” than Emerson? When he says, “If all things are taken away, I have still all things in my relation to the Eternal,” we feel that such an utterance is as natural to his pure spirit as breathing to the frame in which it was imprisoned.

We have had a glimpse of Emerson as a school-master, but behind and far above the teaching drill-master’s desk is the chair from which he speaks to us of “Education.” Compare the short and easy method of the wise man of old,–“He that spareth his rod hateth his son,” with this other, “Be the companion of his thought, the friend of his friendship, the lover of his virtue,–but no kinsman of his sin.”

“The Superlative” will prove light and pleasant reading after these graver essays. [Greek: Maedhen agan]–_ne quid nimis_,–nothing in excess, was his precept as to adjectives.

Two sentences from “The Sovereignty of Ethics” will go far towards reconciling elderly readers who have not forgotten the Westminster Assembly’s Catechism with this sweet-souled dealer in spiritual dynamite:–

“Luther would cut his hand off sooner than write theses against the pope if he suspected that he was bringing on with all his might the pale negations of Boston Unitarianism.–

“If I miss the inspiration of the saints of Calvinism, or of Platonism, or of Buddhism, our times are not up to theirs, or, more truly, have not yet their own legitimate force.”

So, too, this from “The Preacher”:–

“All civil mankind have agreed in leaving one day for contemplation against six for practice. I hope that day will keep its honor and its use.–The Sabbath changes its forms from age to age, but the substantial benefit endures.”

The special interest of the Address called “The Man of Letters” is, that it was delivered during the war. He was no advocate for peace where great principles were at the bottom of the conflict:–

“War, seeking for the roots of strength, comes upon the moral aspects at once.–War ennobles the age.–Battle, with the sword, has cut many a Gordian knot in twain which all the wit of East and West, of Northern and Border statesmen could not untie.”

“The Scholar” was delivered before two Societies at the University of Virginia so late as the year 1876. If I must select any of its wise words, I will choose the questions which he has himself italicized to show his sense of their importance:–

“For all men, all women, Time, your country, your condition, the invisible world are the interrogators: _Who are you? What do you? Can you obtain what you wish? Is there method in your consciousness? Can you see tendency in your life? Can you help any soul_?

“Can he answer these questions? Can he dispose of them? Happy if you can answer them mutely in the order and disposition of your life! Happy for more than yourself, a benefactor of men, if you can answer them in works of wisdom, art, or poetry; bestowing on the general mind of men organic creations, to be the guidance and delight of all who know them.”

The Essay on “Plutarch” has a peculiar value from the fact that Emerson owes more to him than to any other author except Plato, who is one of the only two writers quoted oftener than Plutarch. _Mutato nomine_, the portrait which Emerson draws of the Greek moralist might stand for his own:–

“Whatever is eminent in fact or in fiction, in opinion, in character, in institutions, in science–natural, moral, or metaphysical, or in memorable sayings drew his attention and came to his pen with more or less fulness of record.

“A poet in verse or prose must have a sensuous eye, but an intellectual co-perception. Plutarch’s memory is full and his horizon wide. Nothing touches man but he feels to be his.

“Plutarch had a religion which Montaigne wanted, and which defends him from wantonness; and though Plutarch is as plain spoken, his moral sentiment is always pure.–

“I do not know where to find a book–to borrow a phrase of Ben Jonson’s–‘so rammed with life,’ and this in chapters chiefly ethical, which are so prone to be heavy and sentimental.–His vivacity and abundance never leave him to loiter or pound on an incident.–

“In his immense quotation and allusion we quickly cease to discriminate between what he quotes and what he invents.–‘Tis all Plutarch, by right of eminent domain, and all property vests in this emperor.

“It is in consequence of this poetic trait in his mind, that I confess that, in reading him, I embrace the particulars, and carry a faint memory of the argument or general design of the chapter; but he is not less welcome, and he leaves the reader with a relish and a necessity for completing his studies.

“He is a pronounced idealist, who does not hesitate to say, like another Berkeley, ‘Matter is itself privation.’–

“Of philosophy he is more interested in the results than in the method. He has a just instinct of the presence of a master, and prefers to sit as a scholar with Plato than as a disputant.

“His natural history is that of a lover and poet, and not of a physicist.

“But though curious in the questions of the schools on the nature and genesis of things, his extreme interest in every trait of character, and his broad humanity, lead him constantly to Morals, to the study of the Beautiful and Good. Hence his love of heroes, his rule of life, and his clear convictions of the high destiny of the soul. La Harpe said that ‘Plutarch is the genius the most naturally moral that ever existed.’

“Plutarch thought ‘truth to be the greatest good that man can receive, and the goodliest blessing that God can give.’

“All his judgments are noble. He thought with Epicurus that it is more delightful to do than to receive a kindness.

“Plutarch was well-born, well-conditioned–eminently social, he was a king in his own house, surrounded himself with select friends, and knew the high value of good conversation.–

“He had that universal sympathy with genius which makes all its victories his own; though he never used verse, he had many qualities of the poet in the power of his imagination, the speed of his mental associations, and his sharp, objective eyes. But what specially marks him, he is a chief example of the illumination of the intellect by the force of morals.”

How much, of all this would have been recognized as just and true if it had been set down in an obituary notice of Emerson!

I have already made use of several of the other papers contained in this volume, and will merely enumerate all that follow the “Plutarch.” Some of the titles will be sure to attract the reader. They are “Historic Notes of Life and Letters in New England;” “The Chardon Street Convention;” “Ezra Ripley, D.D.;” “Mary Moody Emerson;” “Samuel Hoar;” “Thoreau;” “Carlyle.”–

Mr. Cabot prefaces the eleventh and last volume of Emerson’s writings with the following “Note”:–

“The first five pieces in this volume, and the ‘Editorial Address’ from the ‘Massachusetts Quarterly Review,’ were published by Mr. Emerson long ago. The speeches at the John Brown, the Walter Scott, and the Free Religious Association meetings were published at the time, no doubt with his consent, but without any active co-operation on his part. The ‘Fortune of the Republic’ appeared separately in 1879; the rest have never been published. In none was any change from the original form made by me, except in the ‘Fortune of the Republic,’ which was made up of several lectures for the occasion upon which it was read.”

The volume of “Miscellanies” contains no less than twenty-three pieces of very various lengths and relating to many different subjects. The five referred to as having been previously published are, “The Lord’s Supper,” the “Historical Discourse in Concord,” the “Address at the Dedication of the Soldiers’ Monument in Concord,” the “Address on Emancipation in the British West Indies,” and the Lecture or Essay on “War,”–all of which have been already spoken of.

Next in order comes a Lecture on the “Fugitive Slave Law.” Emerson says, “I do not often speak on public questions.–My own habitual view is to the well-being of scholars.” But he leaves his studies to attack the institution of slavery, from which he says he himself has never suffered any inconvenience, and the “Law,” which the abolitionists would always call the “Fugitive Slave _Bill_.” Emerson had a great admiration for Mr. Webster, but he did not spare him as he recalled his speech of the seventh of March, just four years before the delivery of this Lecture. He warns against false leadership:–

“To make good the cause of Freedom, you must draw off from all foolish trust in others.–He only who is able to stand alone is qualified for society. And that I understand to be the end for which a soul exists in this world,–to be himself the counter-balance of all falsehood and all wrong.–The Anglo-Saxon race is proud and strong and selfish.–England maintains trade, not liberty.”

Cowper had said long before this:–

“doing good,
Disinterested good, is not our trade.”

And America found that England had not learned that trade when, fifteen years after this discourse was delivered, the conflict between the free and slave states threatened the ruin of the great Republic, and England forgot her Anti-slavery in the prospect of the downfall of “a great empire which threatens to overshadow the whole earth.”

It must be remembered that Emerson had never been identified with the abolitionists. But an individual act of wrong sometimes gives a sharp point to a blunt dagger which has been kept in its sheath too long:–

“The events of the last few years and months and days have taught us the lessons of centuries. I do not see how a barbarous community and a civilized community can constitute one State. I think we must get rid of slavery or we must get rid of freedom.”

These were his words on the 26th of May, 1856, in his speech on “The Assault upon Mr. Sumner.” A few months later, in his “Speech on the Affairs of Kansas,” delivered almost five years before the first gun was fired at Fort Sumter, he spoke the following fatally prophetic and commanding words:–

“The hour is coming when the strongest will not be strong enough. A harder task will the new revolution of the nineteenth century be than was the revolution of the eighteenth century. I think the American Revolution bought its glory cheap. If the problem was new, it was simple. If there were few people, they were united, and the enemy three thousand miles off. But now, vast property, gigantic interests, family connections, webs of party, cover the land with a net-work that immensely multiplies the dangers of war.

“Fellow-citizens, in these times full of the fate of the Republic, I think the towns should hold town meetings, and resolve themselves into Committees of Safety, go into permanent sessions, adjourning from week to week, from month to month. I wish we could send the sergeant-at-arms to stop every American who is about to leave the country. Send home every one who is abroad, lest they should find no country to return to. Come home and stay at home while there is a country to save. When it is lost it will be time enough then for any who are luckless enough to remain alive to gather up their clothes and depart to some land where freedom exists.”

Two short speeches follow, one delivered at a meeting for the relief of the family of John Brown, on the 18th of November, 1859, the other after his execution:–

“Our blind statesmen,” he says, “go up and down, with committees of vigilance and safety, hunting for the origin of this new heresy. They will need a very vigilant committee indeed to find its birthplace, and a very strong force to root it out. For the arch-Abolitionist, older than Brown, and older than the Shenandoah Mountains, is Love, whose other name is Justice, which was before Alfred, before Lycurgus, before Slavery, and will be after it.”

From his “Discourse on Theodore Parker” I take the following vigorous sentence:–

“His commanding merit as a reformer is this, that he insisted beyond all men in pulpits,–I cannot think of one rival,–that the essence of Christianity is its practical morals; it is there for use, or it is nothing; and if you combine it with sharp trading, or with ordinary city ambitions to gloze over municipal corruptions, or private intemperance, or successful fraud, or immoral politics, or unjust wars, or the cheating of Indians, or the robbery of frontier nations, or leaving your principles at home to follow on the high seas or in Europe a supple complaisance to tyrants,–it is hypocrisy, and the truth is not in you; and no love of religious music, or of dreams of Swedenborg, or praise of John Wesley, or of Jeremy Taylor, can save you from the Satan which you are.”

The Lecture on “American Civilization,” made up from two Addresses, one of which was delivered at Washington on the 31st of January, 1862, is, as might be expected, full of anti-slavery. That on the “Emancipation Proclamation,” delivered in Boston in September, 1862, is as full of “silent joy” at the advent of “a day which most of us dared not hope to see,–an event worth the dreadful war, worth its costs and uncertainties.”

From the “Remarks” at the funeral services for Abraham Lincoln, held in Concord on the 19th of April, 1865, I extract this admirably drawn character of the man:–

“He is the true history of the American people in his time. Step by step he walked before them; slow with their slowness, quickening his march by theirs, the true representative of this continent; an entirely public man; father of his country, the pulse of twenty millions throbbing in his heart, the thought of their minds articulated by his tongue.”

The following are the titles of the remaining contents of this volume: “Harvard Commemoration Speech;” “Editor’s Address: Massachusetts Quarterly Review;” “Woman;” “Address to Kossuth;” “Robert Burns;” “Walter Scott;” “Remarks at the Organization of the Free Religious Association;” “Speech at the Annual Meeting of the Free Religious Association;” “The Fortune of the Republic.” In treating of the “Woman Question,” Emerson speaks temperately, delicately, with perfect fairness, but leaves it in the hands of the women themselves to determine whether they shall have an equal part in public affairs. “The new movement,” he says, “is only a tide shared by the spirits of man and woman; and you may proceed in the faith that whatever the woman’s heart is prompted to desire, the man’s mind is simultaneously prompted to accomplish.”

It is hard to turn a leaf in any book of Emerson’s writing without finding some pithy remark or some striking image or witty comment which illuminates the page where we find it and tempts us to seize upon it for an extract. But I must content myself with these few sentences from “The Fortune of the Republic,” the last address he ever delivered, in which his belief in America and her institutions, and his trust in the Providence which overrules all nations and all worlds, have found fitting utterance:–

“Let the passion for America cast out the passion for Europe. Here let there be what the earth waits for,–exalted manhood. What this country longs for is personalities, grand persons, to counteract its materialities. For it is the rule of the universe that corn shall serve man, and not man corn.

“They who find America insipid,–they for whom London and Paris have spoiled their own homes, can be spared to return to those cities. I not only see a career at home for more genius than we have, but for more than there is in the world.

“Our helm is given up to a better guidance than our own; the course of events is quite too strong for any helmsman, and our little wherry is taken in tow by the ship of the great Admiral which knows the way, and has the force to draw men and states and planets to their good.”

With this expression of love and respect for his country and trust in his country’s God, we may take leave of Emerson’s prose writings.

CHAPTER XIV.

EMERSON’S POEMS.

The following “Prefatory Note” by Mr. Cabot introduces the ninth volume of the series of Emerson’s collected works:–

“This volume contains nearly all the pieces included in the POEMS and MAY-DAY of former editions. In 1876 Mr. Emerson published a selection from his poems, adding six new ones, and omitting many. Of those omitted, several are now restored, in accordance with the expressed wishes of many readers and lovers of them. Also some pieces never before published are here given in an Appendix, on various grounds. Some of them appear to have had Emerson’s approval, but to have been withheld because they were unfinished. These it seemed best not to suppress, now that they can never receive their completion. Others, mostly of an early date, remained unpublished doubtless because of their personal and private nature. Some of these seem to have an autobiographic interest sufficient to justify their publication. Others again, often mere fragments, have been admitted as characteristic, or as expressing in poetic form thoughts found in the Essays.

“In coming to a decision in these cases, it seemed on the whole preferable to take the risk of including too much rather than the opposite, and to leave the task of further winnowing to the hands of time.

“As was stated in the Preface to the first volume of this edition of Mr. Emerson’s writings, the readings adopted by him in the “Selected Poems” have not always been followed here, but in some cases preference has been given to corrections made by him when he was in fuller strength than at the time of the last revision.

“A change in the arrangement of the stanzas of “May-Day,” in the part representative of the march of Spring, received his sanction as bringing them more nearly in accordance with the events in Nature.”

Emerson’s verse has been a fertile source of discussion. Some have called him a poet and nothing but a poet, and some have made so much of the palpable defects of his verse that they have forgotten to recognize its true claims. His prose is often highly poetical, but his verse is something more than the most imaginative and rhetorical passages of his prose. An illustration presently to be given will make this point clear.

Poetry is to prose what the so-called full dress of the ball-room is to the plainer garments of the household and the street. Full dress, as we call it, is so full of beauty that it cannot hold it all, and the redundancy of nature overflows the narrowed margin of satin or velvet.

It reconciles us to its approach to nudity by the richness of its drapery and ornaments. A pearl or diamond necklace or a blushing bouquet excuses the liberal allowance of undisguised nature. We expect from the fine lady in her brocades and laces a generosity of display which we should reprimand with the virtuous severity of Tartuffe if ventured upon by the waiting-maid in her calicoes. So the poet reveals himself under the protection of his imaginative and melodious phrases,–the flowers and jewels of his vocabulary.

Here is a prose sentence from Emerson’s “Works and Days:”–

“The days are ever divine as to the first Aryans. They come and go like muffled and veiled figures, sent from a distant friendly party; but they say nothing, and if we do not use the gifts they bring, they carry them as silently away.”

Now see this thought in full dress, and then ask what is the difference between prose and poetry:–

“DAYS.

“Daughters of Time, the hypocritic Days, Muffled and dumb like barefoot dervishes, And marching single in an endless file, Bring diadems and fagots in their hands. To each they offer gifts after his will, Bread, kingdom, stars, and sky that holds them all. I, in my pleached garden watched the pomp, Forgot my morning wishes, hastily
Took a few herbs and apples, and the Day Turned and departed silent. I too late
Under her solemn fillet saw the scorn.”

–Cinderella at the fireside, and Cinderella at the prince’s ball! The full dress version of the thought is glittering with new images like bracelets and brooches and ear-rings, and fringed with fresh adjectives like edges of embroidery. That one word _pleached,_ an heir-loom from Queen Elizabeth’s day, gives to the noble sonnet an antique dignity and charm like the effect of an ancestral jewel. But mark that now the poet reveals himself as he could not in the prosaic form of the first extract. It is his own neglect of his great opportunity of which he now speaks, and not merely the indolent indifference of others. It is himself who is the object of scorn. Self-revelation of beauty embellished by ornaments is the privilege of full dress; self-revelation in the florid costume of verse is the divine right of the poet. Passion that must express itself longs always for the freedom of rhythmic utterance. And in spite of the exaggeration and extravagance which shield themselves under the claim of poetic license, I venture to affirm that “_In_ vino _veritas_” is not truer than _In_ carmine _veritas_. As a further illustration of what has just been said of the self-revelations to be looked for in verse, and in Emerson’s verse more especially, let the reader observe how freely he talks about his bodily presence and infirmities in his poetry,–subjects he never referred to in prose, except incidentally, in private letters.

Emerson is so essentially a poet that whole pages of his are like so many litanies of alternating chants and recitations. His thoughts slip on and off their light rhythmic robes just as the mood takes him, as was shown in the passage I have quoted in prose and in verse. Many of the metrical preludes to his lectures are a versified and condensed abstract of the leading doctrine of the discourse. They are a curious instance of survival; the lecturer, once a preacher, still wants his text; and finds his scriptural motto in his own rhythmic inspiration.

Shall we rank Emerson among the great poets or not?

“The great poets are judged by the frame of mind they induce; and to them, of all men, the severest criticism is due.”

These are Emerson’s words in the Preface to “Parnassus.”

His own poems will stand this test as well as any in the language. They lift the reader into a higher region of thought and feeling. This seems to me a better test to apply to them than the one which Mr. Arnold cited from Milton. The passage containing this must be taken, not alone, but with the context. Milton had been speaking of “Logic” and of “Rhetoric,” and spoke of poetry “as being less subtile and fine, but more simple, sensuous, and passionate.” This relative statement, it must not be forgotten, is conditioned by what went before. If the terms are used absolutely, and not comparatively, as Milton used them, they must be very elastic if they would stretch widely enough to include all the poems which the world recognizes as masterpieces, nay, to include some of the best of Milton’s own.

In spite of what he said about himself in his letter to Carlyle, Emerson was not only a poet, but a very remarkable one. Whether a great poet or not will depend on the scale we use and the meaning we affix to the term. The heat at eighty degrees of Fahrenheit is one thing and the heat at eighty degrees of Reaumur is a very different matter. The rank of poets is a point of very unstable equilibrium. From the days of Homer to our own, critics have been disputing about the place to be assigned to this or that member of the poetic hierarchy. It is not the most popular poet who is necessarily the greatest; Wordsworth never had half the popularity of Scott or Moore. It is not the multitude of remembered passages which settles the rank of a metrical composition as poetry. Gray’s “Elegy,” it is true, is full of lines we all remember, and is a great poem, if that term can be applied to any piece of verse of that length. But what shall we say to the “Ars Poetica” of Horace? It is crowded with lines worn smooth as old sesterces by constant quotation. And yet we should rather call it a versified criticism than a poem in the full sense of that word. And what shall we do with Pope’s “Essay on Man,” which has furnished more familiar lines than “Paradise Lost” and “Paradise Regained” both together? For all that, we know there is a school of writers who will not allow that Pope deserves the name of poet.

It takes a generation or two to find out what are the passages in a great writer which are to become commonplaces in literature and conversation. It is to be remembered that Emerson is one of those authors whose popularity must diffuse itself from above downwards. And after all, few will dare assert that “The Vanity of Human Wishes” is greater as a poem than Shelley’s “Ode to the West Wind,” or Keats’s “Ode to a Nightingale,” because no line in either of these poems is half so often quoted as

“To point a moral or adorn a tale.”

We cannot do better than begin our consideration of Emerson’s poetry with Emerson’s own self-estimate. He says in a fit of humility, writing to Carlyle:–

“I do not belong to the poets, but only to a low department of literature, the reporters, suburban men.”

But Miss Peabody writes to Mr. Ireland:–

“He once said to me, ‘I am not a great poet–but whatever is of me _is a poet_.'”

These opposite feelings were the offspring of different moods and different periods.

Here is a fragment, written at the age of twenty-eight, in which his self-distrust and his consciousness of the “vision,” if not “the faculty, divine,” are revealed with the brave nudity of the rhythmic confessional:–

“A dull uncertain brain,
But gifted yet to know
That God has cherubim who go
Singing an immortal strain,
Immortal here below.
I know the mighty bards,
I listen while they sing,
And now I know
The secret store
Which these explore
When they with torch of genius pierce The tenfold clouds that cover
The riches of the universe
From God’s adoring lover.
And if to me it is not given
To fetch one ingot thence
Of that unfading gold of Heaven
His merchants may dispense,
Yet well I know the royal mine
And know the sparkle of its ore,
Know Heaven’s truth from lies that shine,– Explored, they teach us to explore.”

These lines are from “The Poet,” a series of fragments given in the “Appendix,” which, with his first volume, “Poems,” his second, “May-Day, and other Pieces,” form the complete ninth volume of the new series. These fragments contain some of the loftiest and noblest passages to be found in his poetical works, and if the reader should doubt which of Emerson’s self-estimates in his two different moods spoken of above had most truth in it, he could question no longer after reading “The Poet.”

Emerson has the most exalted ideas of the true poetic function, as this passage from “Merlin” sufficiently shows:–

“Thy trivial harp will never please
Or fill my craving ear;
Its chords should ring as blows the breeze, Free, peremptory, clear.
No jingling serenader’s art
Nor tinkling of piano-strings
Can make the wild blood start
In its mystic springs;
The kingly bard
Must smite the chords rudely and hard, As with hammer or with mace;
That they may render back
Artful thunder, which conveys
Secrets of the solar track,
Sparks of the supersolar blaze.

* * * * *

Great is the art,
Great be the manners of the bard.
He shall not his brain encumber
With the coil of rhythm and number; But leaving rule and pale forethought
He shall aye climb
For his rhyme.
‘Pass in, pass in,’ the angels say, ‘In to the upper doors,
Nor count compartments of the floors, But mount to paradise
By the stairway of surprise.'”

And here is another passage from “The Poet,” mentioned in the quotation before the last, in which the bard is spoken of as performing greater miracles than those ascribed to Orpheus:–

“A Brother of the world, his song
Sounded like a tempest strong
Which tore from oaks their branches broad, And stars from the ecliptic road.
Time wore he as his clothing-weeds, He sowed the sun and moon for seeds.
As melts the iceberg in the seas,
As clouds give rain to the eastern breeze, As snow-banks thaw in April’s beam,
The solid kingdoms like a dream
Resist in vain his motive strain,
They totter now and float amain.
For the Muse gave special charge
His learning should be deep and large, And his training should not scant
The deepest lore of wealth or want: His flesh should feel, his eyes should read Every maxim of dreadful Need;
In its fulness he should taste
Life’s honeycomb, but not too fast; Full fed, but not intoxicated;
He should be loved; he should be hated; A blooming child to children dear,
His heart should palpitate with fear.”

We look naturally to see what poets were Emerson’s chief favorites. In his poems “The Test” and “The Solution,” we find that the five whom he recognizes as defying the powers of destruction are Homer, Dante,