As our philosopher explains, the influence of common sense is above all appreciation of daily events. “We have,” he continues, “very rarely in life the opportunity of making grave decisions, but we are called upon daily to resolve unimportant problems, and we can only do it in a judicious way, if we are allowed to devote ourselves to certain kinds of investigation.
“This is what may be called to judge with discrimination, otherwise, with common sense.
“Without this faculty, it is in vain that our memory amasses the materials, which must serve us in the comparative examination of facts.
“And this examination can only be spoiled by decrepitude, if common sense did not succeed in dictating its conclusions to us.
“Thanks to this faculty, we possess this accuracy of mind which permits us to discern truth from falsehood.
“It is this power which aids us in distinguishing what we should consider as a duty, as a right, or as a thing conforming to equity, established by the laws of intelligence.
“Without common sense we should be like an inexperienced gardener, who, for want of knowledge, would allow the tares to grow and would neglect the plants whose function is to nourish man.
“In order to conform to the habit of judging with common sense, one ought first to lay down the following principle:
“No fact can exist, unless there is a sufficient motive to determine its nature.
“It is when operating on the elements furnished us by common sense that we are able to discern the quality of the object of our attention.
“One day, a sage, whom people gladly consulted, was asked by what means he had learned to know so well the exact proportion of things, so that he never failed to attribute to them their real value.
“‘Why’ they added, ‘can you foresee so exactly the evil and direct us to that which is right and just?’
“And the superstitious people added:
“‘Are you not in communication with the spirits, which float in space, which come from the other world?
“Would you not be counseled by voices which we have not the power to hear, and do you not see things which are visible to you alone?’
“‘You are right,’ replied the saintly man, smiling:
“‘I have indeed the power to hear and to see that which you do not perceive; but sorcery has no relation to the power which is attributed to me.
“If you wish, you will be able to possess it in your turn, for my means are not a secret.
“‘I keep my eyes and ears open.’
“And as every one burst out laughing, believing it a joke, the sage began again:
“‘But this is not all; after having seen and heard, I call to my aid all the qualities which constitute common sense and, thanks to this faculty, I draw my conclusions from my experience, from which enthusiasm, fancy, as well as personal interest are totally excluded.
“‘This done, and my judgment being formulated in my thought, I adapt it to the circumstances, and especially to the material situation and to the mentality of those who consult me.’
“From these counsels,” thinks the Shogun, “we must draw a precious lesson.
“It is true that an exigency, physical or moral, can determine, in different individuals, a very different resolution.
“According to the manner of life adopted, or the direction given to one’s duties, different resolutions can be made without lacking common sense. It is indisputable that what represents social obligations does not demand the same conduct from the peasant as from the prince.
“We should outrage common sense in presenting a workman with a gorgeous robe suitable for great ceremonies, in which to do his work, but reason would be equally outraged if one put on a shabby costume to go to the palace of the Mikado.”
The nature of resolutions inspired by common sense varies according to environment, the time, and the state of mind in which one is.
These conditions make of this quality a virtue really worth acquiring, for it is more difficult to conquer than many others and its effects are of infinite variety.
But as always, Yoritomo, after having signaled the danger, and indicated the remedy, gives us the manner of its application.
That which follows is marked by that simplicity of conception and facility of execution which render the doctrine of the Nippon philosopher absolutely efficacious.
Instead of losing himself by digressing from his subject and by placing himself on the summits of psychology, he remains with us, puts himself on the level of the most humble among us, and says to us all:
“The best way to use common sense in daily life consists in declaring one’s honest intentions.
“What should I do if I were in the place of the person with whom I am discussing?
“I found myself one day on the slope of a hill named Yung-Tshi, and I remarked that the majority of the trees were stript of their foliage.
“The season seeming to me not sufficiently advanced for this condition of vegetation, I exprest my astonishment to a passer-by, who replied to me:
“‘Alas! This occurs every year at the same time, and it is not well to cultivate trees on the height of Yung-Tshi, for the sun, being too hot, dries them up before the time when the foliage ought to fall.’
“A few days afterward my steps lead me on the opposite slope of the same hill.
“There the trees were covered with foliage, still green but uncommon, and their appearance indicated an unhealthy condition of growth.
“‘Alas!’ said a man who was working in the hedges to me, ‘it is not well to cultivate trees on the height of Tung-Tshi, for the sun never shines there, and they can only acquire the vigor they would possess if they were planted in another country.’
“And, altho recognizing the truth of these two opinions, so contradictory, I could not help thinking that they were the reproduction of those which men, deprived of common sense, express every day.
“The same hill produced a vegetation, affected in different ways, by reason of different causes; and the people, instead of taking into consideration how carelessly they had chosen the location of their plantation, preferred to attribute the defect to the site itself, rather than to their lack of precaution.
“Both of them were suffering from a hurtful exaggeration, but each one explained it in a way arbitrarily exclusive.
“He of the north made out that the sun never shone on the summit of Yung-Tshi, and the inhabitant of the south affirmed that the health-giving shade was unknown there.”
This is why it is indispensable to the successful resolution of the thousand and one problems of daily life, both those whose sole importance is derived from their multiplicity and those whose seriousness justly demands our attention, to employ the very simple method which prescribes that we place ourselves mentally in the position and circumstances of the person with whom we are discussing.
If each one of the inhabitants of Yung-Tshi had followed this precept, instead of declaring that the hill never received the sun or that shade never fell upon it, they would each one have thought for himself.
“At what conclusions should I arrive, if I had planted my trees on the opposite side?”
From the reasoning which would have ensued, the following truth would most certainly have been revealed.
“If I were in the other man’s place, I should certainly think as he does.”
This premise once laid down, the conclusion would be reached; all the more exact, because, without abandoning their arguments, each one would present those which it is easy to turn against an adversary.
Before solving a problem, he who desires to avoid making a mistake must never fail to ask himself this question:
What should I do if my interests were those of the opposite party?
Or, yet again:
What should I reply if my adversaries used the same language to me as I purpose using when addressing them?
This method is valuable in that it raises unexpected objections, which the mind would not consider if one had simply studied the question from one’s own point of view.
It is a self-evident fact that, according to the state of mind in which we are, things assume different proportions in the rendering of judgment on them.
We must not argue as children do, who, not having the sense of calculating distances, ask how the man standing near to them will be able to enter his house, which they see far away, and which seems to them of microscopic dimensions.
One departs from common sense when one attributes to insignificant things a fundamental value.
We neglect to consider it in a most serious way when we adopt principles contrary to the general consensus of opinion accredited in the environment in which we are living.
“A high dignitary of the court,” says Yoritomo, “would be lacking in common sense if he wished to conduct himself as a peasant and, on the other hand, a peasant would give a proof of great folly were he to attempt the remodeling of his life on the principles adopted by courtiers.
“He who, passing his life in camps, wished to think and to act like the philosopher, whose books are his principal society, would cause people to doubt his wisdom; and the thinker who should adopt publicly the methods of a swashbuckler would only inspire contempt.”
In ordinary life, one ought to consider this faculty of common sense as the ruling principle of conduct.
One can be lacking in thought, in audacity, in brilliant qualities, if only one possesses common sense.
It takes the place of intelligence in many people, whose minds, unaccustomed to subtle argument, only lend themselves to very simple reasoning.
A versatile mentality rarely belongs to such minds, because it is not their forte to unfold hidden truths.
It walks in the light and keeps in the very middle of the road, far from the ambushes which may be concealed by the hedges of the cross-roads.
Many people gifted with common sense but deprived of ordinary intelligence have amassed a fortune, but never, no matter how clever he may be, has a man known success, if he has not strictly observed the laws of common sense.
It is not only in debates that the presence of this virtue should make itself felt, but every act of our life should be impregnated with it.
There are no circumstances, no matter how insignificant they may appear, where the intervention of common sense would be undesirable.
It is only common sense which will indicate the course of conduct to be pursued, so as not to hurt the feelings or offend the prejudices of other people.
There are great savants, whose science, freed from all puerile beliefs, rises above current superstition.
They would consider it a great lack of common sense if they expounded their theories before the humble-minded, whose blind faith would be injured thereby.
Of two things one is certain: either they would refuse to believe such theories and this display of learning would be fruitless, or their habitual credulity would be troubled and they would lose their tranquility without acquiring a conviction sufficiently strong to give them perfect peace of mind.
Even in things which concern health, common sense is applicable to daily life.
It is common sense which will preserve us from excesses, by establishing the equilibrium of the annoyances which result from them, with reference to the doubtful pleasure which they procure.
Thanks to common sense, we shall avoid the weariness of late nights and the danger of giving oneself up to the delights of dissipation.
“It is common sense,” says the philosopher, “which forces us at a banquet to raise our eyes to the hour-glass to find out how late it is.
“It is under the inspiration of this great quality of mind that we shall avoid putting to our lips the cup already emptied many times.
“Common sense will reflect upon the mirror of our imagination the specter of the day after the orgy; it will evoke the monster of the headache which works upon the suffering cranium with its claws of steel; and, at some future day, it will show us precocious decrepitude as well as all bodily ills which precede the final decay of those who yield to their passions. It will also impose upon us the performance of duty under the form which it has adopted for each individual.
“Common sense represents for some the care of public affairs; for others those of the family; for us all the great desire to leave intact to our descendants the name which we have received from our fathers.
“For some of those still very young, it is like a lover long desired!
“For sages and warriors, it blows the trumpet of glory.
“Finally, common sense is the chosen purpose of every one, courted, demanded, desired or accepted, but it exists, and under the penalty of most serious inconveniences it does not permit us to forget its existence.”
Coming down from the heights where he allows himself to be transported at times for a brief moment, Yoritomo tells us the part played by common sense with reference to health.
“Common sense” he assures us, “is the wisest physician whom it is possible to consult.
“If we followed its advice, we should avoid the thousand and one little annoyances of illnesses caused by imprudence.
“The choice of clothing would be regulated according to the existing temperature.
“One would avoid the passing at once from extreme heat to extreme cold.
“One would never proffer this stupid reflection: Bah! I shall take care of myself, which impudent people declare when exposing themselves carelessly to take cold.
“We should understand that disease is a cause of unparalleled disorder and discord.
“In addition to the thought of possible sufferings, that of grief for those whom we love, joined to the apprehension of a cessation of social functions, on whose achievement depends our fortune, would suffice to eliminate all idea of imprudence, if we had the habit of allowing common sense to participate in all our actions of daily life.
“To those who walk under its guidance; it manifests itself without ceasing; it dominates all actions without their being compelled to separate themselves from it.
“It is unconsciously that they appeal to common sense and they have no need of making an effort to follow its laws.
“Common sense is the intelligence of instinct.”
LESSON VII
POWER OF DEDUCTION
Before entering the path which relates directly to the intellectual efforts concerning the acquisition of common sense, the Shogun calls our attention to the power of deduction.
“It is only,” said he, “where we are sufficiently permeated with all the principles of judgment that we shall be able to think of acquiring this quality, so necessary to the harmony of life.
“The most important of all the mental operations which ought to be practised by him who desires common sense to reign supreme in all his actions and decisions, is incontestably deduction.
“When the union of ideas, which judgment permits, is made with perception and exactness, there results always an analysis, which, if practised frequently, will end by becoming almost a mechanical act.
“It is, however, well to study the phases of this analysis, in order to organize them methodically first.
“Later, when the mind shall be sufficiently drilled in this kind of gymnastics, all their movements will be repeated in an almost unconscious way, and deduction, that essential principle of common sense, will be self-imposed.
“In order that deductions may be a natural development, the element relating to those which should be the object of judgment should be grouped first.
“The association of statements is an excellent method for it introduces into thought the existence of productive agents.
“We have already spoken of the grouping of thoughts, which is a more synthetical form of that selection.
“Instead of allowing it to be enlarged by touching lightly on all that which is connected with the subject, it is a question, on the contrary, of confining it to the facts relating to only one object.
“These facts should be drawn from the domain of the past; by comparison, they can be brought to the domain of the present in order to be able to associate the former phenomena with those from which it is a question of drawing deductions.
“It is rarely that these latter depend on one decision alone, even when they are presented under the form of a single negation or affirmation.
“Deduction is always the result of many observations, formulated with great exactness, which common sense binds together.
“That which is called a line of action is always suggested by the analysis of the events which were produced under circumstances analogous to those which exist now.
“From the result of these observations, the habit of thinking permits of drawing deductions and common sense concludes the analysis.
“The method of deduction rests upon this.
“One thing being equal to a previous one should produce the same effects.
“If we find ourselves faced by an incident that our memory can assimilate with another incident of the same kind, we must deduce the following chain of reasoning:
“First, the incident of long ago has entailed inevitable consequences.
“Secondly, the incident of to-day ought to produce the same effects, unless the circumstances which surround it are different.
“It is then a question of analyzing the circumstances and of weighing the causes whose manifestation could determine a disparity in the results.
“We shall interest ourselves first in the surroundings for thus, as we have said, habits of thought and feeling vary according to the epoch and the environment.
“A comparison will be established between persons or things, in order to be absolutely convinced of their degree of conformity.
“The state of mind in which we were when the previous events were manifested will be considered, and we shall not fail to ascertain plainly the similarity or change of humor at the moment as related to that of the past.
“It is also of importance to observe the state of health, for under the affliction of sickness things assume very easily a hostile aspect.
“It would be wrong to attribute to events judged during an illness the same value which is given to them at this present moment.
“When one is absolutely decided as to the relation of new perceptions and mental representations, one can calculate exactly the degree of comparison.
“The moment will then have arrived to synthesize all the observations and to draw from them the following deductions:
“First, like causes ought, all things being equal, to produce like effects.
“Secondly, the event which is in question will therefore have the same consequences as the previous one, since it is presented under the same conditions.
“Or again:
“Being granted the principle that like causes produce like effects, as I have just affirmed, and that there exist certain incompatibilities between the contingencies of the past and those of to-day, one must allow that these incompatibilities will produce different results.
“And, after this reasoning, the deductions will be established by constituting a comparison in favor of either the present or past state of things.”
But the philosopher, who thinks of everything, has foreseen the case where false ideas have obscured the clearness of the deductions, and he said to us:
“The association of false ideas, if it does not proceed from the difficulty of controlling things, is always in ungovernable opposition to the veracity of the deduction.
“What would be thought of a man of eighty years who, coming back to his country after a long absence, said, on seeing the family roof from a distance:
“‘When I was twenty years old, in leaving here, it took me twenty minutes to reach the home of my parents, so I shall reach the threshold in twenty minutes.’
“The facts would be exact in principle.
“The distance to be covered would be the same; but legs of eighty years have not the same agility as those of very young people, and in predicting that he will reach the end of his walk in the same number of minutes as he did in the past, the old man would deceive himself most surely.
“If, on the contrary, on reaching the same place he perceived that a new route had been made, and that instead of a roundabout way of approach, as in the past, the house was now in a straight line from the point where he was looking at it, it would be possible to estimate approximately the number of minutes which he could gain on the time employed in the past, by calculating the delay imposed upon him by his age and his infirmities.
“Those to whom deduction is familiar, at times astonish thoughtless persons by the soundness of their judgment.
“A prince drove to his home in the country in a sumptuous equipage.
“He was preceded by a herald and borne in a palanquin by four servants, who were replaced by others at the first signs of fatigue, in order that the speed of the journey should never be slackened.
“As they were mounting, with great difficulty, a zigzag road which led up along the side of a hill, one of these men cried out:
“‘Stop,’ said he, ‘in the name of Buddha, stop!’
“The prince leaned out from the palanquin to ask the cause of this exclamation:
“‘My lord,’ cried the man, ‘if you care to live, tell your porters to stop!’
“The great man shrugged his shoulders and turning toward his master of ceremonies, who was riding at his side, said:
“‘See what that man wants.’
“But scarcely had the officer allowed his horse to take a few steps in the direction of the man who had given warning when the palanquin, with the prince and his bearers, rolled down a precipice, opened by the sinking in of the earth.
“They raised them all up very much hurt, and the first action of the prince, who was injured, was to have arrested the one who, according to him, had evoked an evil fate.
“He was led, then and there, to the nearest village and put into a cell.
“The poor man protested.
“‘I have only done what was natural,’ said he. ‘I am going to explain it, but I pray you let me see the prince; I shall not be able to justify myself when he is ill with fever.’
“‘What do you mean,’ they replied, ‘do you prophesy that the prince will have a fever?’
“‘He is going to have it.’
“‘You see, you are a sorcerer,’ said the jailer, ‘you make predictions.’
“And then he shut him in prison, to go away and to relate his conversation to them all.
“During this time, they called in a healer who stated that the wounds of the great nobleman were not mortal in themselves, but that the fever which had declared itself could become dangerous.
“He was cured after long months.
“During this time the poor man languished in his prison, from whence he was only taken to appear before the judges.
“Accused of sorcery and of using black magic, he explained very simply that he had foreseen the danger, because in raising his eyes he had noticed that the part of the ground over which the herald had passed was sinking, and that he had drawn the following conclusions:
“The earth seemed to have only a medium thickness.
“Under the feet of the herald he had seen it crumble and fall in.
“He had deduced from this that a weight five times as heavy added to that of the palanquin, would not fail to produce a landslide.
“As to the prediction concerning the fever, it was based on what he had seen when in the war.
“He had then observed that every wound is always followed by a disposition to fever; he therefore could not fail to deduce that the serious contusions occasioned by the fall of the prince would produce the inevitable consequences.
“The judge was very much imprest with the perspicacity of this man; not only did he give him his liberty, but he engaged him in his personal service and in due time enabled him to make his fortune.”
We do not wish to affirm–any more than Yoritomo, for that matter–that fortunate deductions are always so magnificently rewarded as were those of this man.
However, without the causes being so striking, many people have owed their fortune to the faculty which they possest of deducing results where the analogy of the past circumstances suggested to them what would happen.
He warns us against the propensity which we have of too easily avoiding a conclusion which does not accord with our desires.
“Too many people,” said he, “wish to undertake to make deductions by eliminating the elements which deprive them of a desired decision.
“They do not fail either to exaggerate the reasons which plead in favor of this decision; also we see many persons suffer from reasoning, instead of feeling the good effects of it.”
Those who cultivate common sense will never fall into this error, for they will have no difficulty in convincing themselves that by acting thus they do not deceive any one except themselves.
By glossing over truth in order to weaken the logical consequences of deductions they are the first to be the victims of this childish trick.
That which is called false deduction is rarely aught save the desire to escape a resolution which a just appraisement would not fail to dictate.
It might be, also, that this twisting of judgment comes from a person having been, in some past time, subjected to unfortunate influences.
By devoting oneself to the evolution of thought, of which we have already spoken when presenting the symbolical fan, and above all, by adopting the precepts which, following the method of Yoritomo, we are going to develop in the following lessons, we shall certainly succeed in checking the errors of false reasoning.
“The important thing,” said he, “is not to let wander the thought, which, after resting for a moment on the subject with which we are concerned and after touching lightly on ideas of a similar character, begins to stray very far from its basic principles.
“Have you noted the flight of certain birds?
“They commence by gathering at one point, then they describe a series of circles around this point, at first very small, but whose circumference enlarges at every sweep.
“Little by little the central point is abandoned, they no longer approach it, and disappear in the sky, drawn by their fancy toward another point which they will leave very soon.
“The thoughts of one who does not know how to gather them together and to concentrate them are like these birds.
“They start from a central point, then spread out, at first without getting far from this center, but soon they lose sight of it and fly toward a totally different subject that a mental representation has just produced.
“And this lasts until the moment when, in a sudden movement, the first one is conscious of this wandering tendency.
“But it is often too late to bring back these wanderers to the initial idea, for, in the course of their circuits, they have brushed against a hundred others, which are confounded with the first, weaken it, and take away its exact proportions.
“The great stumbling-block again is that of becoming lost in the details whose multiplicity prevents us from discerning their complete function in the act of practising deduction.
“It is better, in the case where our perception finds itself assailed by the multitude of these details, to proceed by the process of elimination, in order not to become involved in useless and lazy efforts.
“In this case we must act like a man who must determine the color of a material at a distance where the tiny designs stand out in a relief of white on a background of black.
“Suppose that he is placed at a distance too great to perceive this detail.
“What should he do to be able to give the best possible description?
“He will proceed by elimination.
“The material is neither red nor green; orange and violet must be set aside, as well as all the subordinate shades.
“It has a dull appearance, hence, it is gray; unless…. And here mental activity comes into play and will suggest to him that gray is composed of black and white.
“He will then be sure to form a judgment which will not be spoiled by falsity, if he declares that the material is a mixture of black and white.
“Later, by drawing nearer, he will be able to analyze the designs and to convince himself of their respective form and color, but by deducing that the material was made up of the mixture of two colors he will have come as near as possible to the truth:
“Deduction never prejudges; it is based on facts; only on things accomplished; it unfolds the teaching that we ought to obtain as a result.”
Again the Shogun recommends to us the union of thoughts and the continuous examination of past incidents in the practise of deductions.
“If on entering a room,” said he, “we are at times confused, it happens also that we correct this impression after a more attentive examination.
“The gilding is of inferior quality; the materials are of cotton, the paintings ordinary, and the mattings coarse.
“At first sight we should have deduced, judging from appearances, that the possessor of this house was a very rich man, but a second examination will cause us to discover embarrassment and anxiety.
“It is the same with all decisions that we must make.
“Before devoting ourselves to deductions inspired by the general aspect of things, it is well to examine them one by one and to discover their defects or recognize their good qualities.
“We shall be able thus to acquire that penetration of mind whose development, by leading us toward wise deductions, will bring us to the discovery of the truth.”
LESSON VIII
HOW TO ACQUIRE COMMON SENSE
Common Sense is a science, whatever may be said; according to Yoritomo, it does not blossom naturally in the minds of men; it demands cultivation, and the art of reasoning is acquired like all the faculties which go to make up moral equilibrium.
“This quality,” said the philosopher, “is obscure and intangible, like the air we breathe.
“Like the air we breathe, it is necessary to our existence, it surrounds us, envelops us, and is indispensable to the harmony of our mental life.
“To acquire this precious gift, many conditions are obligatory, the principle ones being:
“Sincerity of perception.
“Art of the situation.
“Attention.
“Approximation.
“Experience.
“Comparison.
“Analysis.
“Synthesis.
“Destination.
“Direction.
“And lastly the putting of the question.
“It is very clear that without exactness of perception we could not pretend to judge justly; it would then be impossible for us to hear the voice of common sense, if we did not strive to develop it.
“Perception is usually combined with what they call in philosophical language adaptation.
“Otherwise it is difficult, when recognizing a sensation, not to attribute it at once to the sentiment which animated it at the time of its manifestation.
“The first condition, then, in the acquiring of common sense is to maintain perfection in all its pristine exactness, by abstracting the contingencies which could influence us.
“If we do not endeavor to separate from our true selves the suggestions of sense-consciousness, we shall reach the point where perception is transformed into conception, that is to say, we shall no longer obtain reality alone, but a modified reality.
“With regard to perception, if we understand its truthfulness; it will be a question for reawakening it, of placing ourselves mentally in the environment where it was produced, and of awakening the memory, so as to be able to distinguish, without mistake, the limits within which it is narrowly confined.
“The art of situation consists in reproducing, mentally, past facts, allowing for the influence of the surroundings at that time, as compared with the present environment.
“One must not fail to think about the influences to which one has been subjected since this time.
“It is possible that life during its development in the aspirant to common sense may have changed the direction of his first conceptions either by conversation or by reading or by the reproduction of divers narrations.
“It would then be a lack of common sense to base an exact recollection of former incidents on the recent state of being of the soul, without seeking to reproduce the state of mind in which one was at the epoch when those incidents occurred.
“Activity of mind, stimulated to the utmost, is able to give a color to preceding impressions, which they never have had, and, in this case again, the recollection will be marred by inexactness.
“The art of situation requires the strictest application and on this account it is a valuable factor in the acquirement of common sense.
“Attention vitalizes our activity in order to accelerate the development of a definite purpose toward which it can direct its energy.
“It could be analyzed as follows:
“First, to see;
“Secondly, to hear.
“The functions of the other senses come afterward, and their susceptibility can attract our attention to the sensations which they give us, such as the sense of smell, of touch, of taste.
“These purely physical sensations possess, however, a moral signification, from which we are permitted to make valuable deductions.
“The first two have three distinct phases:
“First degree, to see.
“Second degree, to look.
“Third degree, to observe.
“If we see a material, its color strikes us first and we say: I have seen a red or yellow material, and this will be all.
“Applying ourselves more closely, we look at it and we define the peculiarities of the color. We say: it is bright red or dark red.
“In observing it we determine to what use it is destined.
“The eye is attracted by:
“The color.
“The movement.
“The form.
“The number.
“The duration.
“We have just spoken of the color.
“The movement is personified by a series of gestures that people make or by a series of changes to which they subject things.
“The form is represented by the different outlines.
“The number by their quantity.
“The duration by their length; one will judge of the length of time it takes to walk a road by seeing the length of it.
“The act of listening is divided into three degrees.
“First degree, to hear.
“Second degree, to understand.
“Third degree, to reflect.
“If some one walking in the country hears a dog bark he perceives first a sound: this is the act of hearing.
“He will distinguish that this sound is produced by the barking of a dog; this is the act of understanding.
“Reflection will lead him then to think that a house or a human being is near, for a dog goes rarely alone.
“If the things which are presented to our sight are complex, those which strike our ears are summed up in one word, sound, which has only one definition, the quality of the sound.
“Then follow the innumerable categories of sound that we distinguish only by means of comprehension and reflection, rendered so instinctive by habit that we may call them automatic, so far as those which relate to familiar sounds.
“The example which we have just given is a proof of this fact.
“Let us add that this habit develops each sensitive faculty to its highest degree.
“The inhabitants of the country can distinguish each species of bird by listening to his song; and the hermits, the wanderers, those who live with society on a perpetual war footing, perceive sounds which would not strike the ears of civilized people.
“Approximation is also one of the stones by whose aid we construct the edifice of common sense.
“Concerning the calculations of probabilities, the application of approximation will allow us to estimate the capacity or the probable duration of things.
“We can not say positively whether a man will live a definite number of years but we can affirm that he will never live until he is two hundred.
“There are, for approbation, certain known limits which serve as a basis for the construction of reasoning, inspired by common sense.
“It can be affirmed, in a positive way, that, if the trunk of a tree were floating easily, without sinking to the bottom of the water, it would not float the same if thirty men were to ride astride of it.
“The initial weight of the tree permits it to maintain itself on the surface; but if it be increased to an exaggerated total, we can, without hesitation, calculate indirectly the moment when it will disappear, dragging with it the imprudent men who trusted themselves to it.
“Everything in life is a question of approximation.
“The house which is built for a man will be far larger than the kennel, destined to shelter a dog, because the proportions have been calculated, by approximation, according to the relative difference between the stature of the human and canine species.
“Clothing is also suited to the temperature.
“One naturally thinks that, below a certain degree of cold, it is necessary to change light clothes for those made of thicker material.
“As with the majority of the constructive elements of common sense, approximation is always based on experience.
“It draws its conclusions from the knowledge of known limitations, whose affirmation serves as a basis for the argument which determines deduction in a most exact manner.
“Experience itself depends on memory, which permits us to recall facts and to draw our conclusions from them, on which facts reasoning is based.”
The Shogun does not fail to draw our attention to the difference between experience and experimentation.
“This last,” said he, “only serves to incite the manifestation of the first.
“It consists of determining the production of a phenomenon whose existence will aid us in establishing the underlying principles of an observation which interprets the event.
“That is what is called experience.
“Comparison is a mental operation which permits us to bring things that we desire to understand to a certain point.
“It is comparison which has divided time according to periods, which the moon follows during its entire length.
“It is by comparing their different aspects and by calculating the duration of their transformations, that men have been able to divide time as they do in all the countries of the world.
“The science of numbers is also born of comparison, which has been established between the quantities that they represent.
“This is the art of calculating the differences existing between each thing, by determining the relativeness of their respective proportions.
“Comparison acts on the mind automatically, as a rule.
“It is indispensable to the cultivation of common sense, for it furnishes the means of judging with full knowledge of all the circumstances.
“Analysis is an operation, which consists of separating each detail from the whole and of examining these details separately, without losing sight of their relationship to the central element.
“Analysis of the same object, while being scrupulously exact, can, however, differ materially in its application, according to the way that the object is related to this or that group of circumstances.
“There are, however, immutable things.
“For example: the letters of the alphabet, the elementary sounds, the colors etc., etc.
“It suffices to quote only these three elements; one can easily understand that the most elaborate manuscript is composed of only a definite number of letters always repeating themselves, whose juxtaposition forms phrases, then chapters, and finally the complete work.
“Music is composed only of seven sounds whose different combinations produce an infinite variety of melodies.
“Elementary colors are only three in number.
“All the others gravitate around them.
“Therefore, these same letters, these same notes, these same colors, according to their amalgamation, can change in aspect and cooperate in the production of different effects.
“The same letters can express, according to the order in which they are placed, terror or confidence, joy or grief.
“The same is true of notes and colors.
“Common sense ought then, considering these rules, to know how to analyze all the details and, having done this, to coordinate and to classify them, in order to distinguish them easily.
“Coordination and classification form an integral part of common sense.”
And Yoritomo, who delights in reducing the most complex questions to examples of the rarest simplicity, says to us:
“I am supposing that one person says to another, I have just met a negro. The interlocutor, as well as he who mechanically registers this fact, without thinking, gives himself up to analysis and to coordination which always precedes synthesis.
“Without being aware of this mental action, their minds will be occupied first with the operations of perception then of classification.
“This negro was a man of a color which places him in a certain group of the human race.
“It is always thus that common sense proceeds, its principal merit being to know how to unite present perceptions with those previously cognized, then to understand how to coordinate them so as to be able to group them concretely, that is to say, to synthesize them.
“Destination is defined as the purpose or object, born of deduction and of classification.
“Destination does not permit of losing sight of the end which is proposed.
“It allows the consideration of the purpose to predominate always, and directs all actions toward this purpose, these actions being absolutely the demonstrations of this unique thought.
“Habits, acquired in view of certain realizations, ought to be dropt from the moment the purpose is accomplished, or that it is weakened.”
It is by absolutely perpetuating those habits, whose pretext has disappeared, that one sees the achievement of certain actions which have been roughly handled by common sense.
“There are,” again says the philosopher, “certain customs, whose origin it is impossible to remember; at the time of their birth, they were engendered by necessity, but even tho their purpose be obliterated, tradition has preserved them in spite of everything, and those who observe them do not take into consideration their absurdity.
“People of common sense refrain from lending themselves to these useless practises, or, if they consent to allow them a place in their thoughts it is that they attribute to them some reason for existence, either practical or sentimental.”
Direction is indicated by circumstances, by environment, or by necessity.
There is direction of resolutions as well as direction of a journey; it is necessary, from the beginning, to consider well the choice of a good route, after having done everything possible to discriminate carefully between it and all other routes proposed.
It happens, however, that the way leads also through the cross-roads; it is even indispensable to leave the short cuts in order to trace the outline of the obstacles.
Direction is, then, an important factor in the acquiring of common sense.
The putting of the question takes its character from comparison, from experience, and principally from approximation; but it is in itself a synthesis of all the elements which compose common sense.
He who wishes to acquire common sense should be impregnated with all that has preceded.
Then he will discipline himself, so as to be able to judge, by himself, of the degree of reason which he has the right to assume.
He will begin by evoking some subject, comparing its visual forms with, those forms which he understands the best, in other words, to the perceptions which are the most familiar to him.
If it concerns a question to be solved, he will try to recall some similar subject, and establish harmony, by making them both relative to a common antecedent.
Yoritomo advises choosing simple thoughts for the beginning.
“One will say, for example:
“Such a substance is a poison; the seeds of this fruit contain a weak dose of it; these seeds could then become a dangerous food, if one absorbed a considerable quantity.
“Common sense will thus indicate a certain abstaining from eating of it.
“Then one may extend his argument to things of a greater importance, but taking great care to keep within the narrow limits of rudimentary logic.
“One must be impregnated with this principle:
“Two things equal to a third demand an affirmative judgment or decision.
“In the opposite case the negative deduction is enjoined.
“It is by deductions from the most ordinary facts that one succeeds in making common sense intervene automatically in all our judgments.
“What would be thought of one who, finding himself in a forest at the time of a violent storm, would reason as follows:
“First: The high summits attract lightning.
“Secondly: Here is a giant tree.
“Thirdly: I’m going to take refuge there.
“Then it is that common sense demands that the state his three propositions as follows:
“First: High summits attract lightning.
“Secondly: Here is a giant tree.
“Thirdly: I’m going to avoid its proximity because it will surely be dangerous.
“If he acted otherwise; if, in spite of his knowledge of the danger, he took shelter under the branches of the gigantic tree, exposing himself to be struck by lightning, one could, in this case, only reproach him with imprudence and lay the blame to the lack of common sense which allowed him to perform the act that logic condemned.”
Now the old Nippon speaks to us of the means to employ, that we may avoid pronouncing too hasty judgments, which are always, of necessity, weakened by a too great indulgence for ourselves and at the same time too great a severity for others.
“I was walking one day,” said he, “on the shores of a lake, when I discovered a man sitting at the foot of a bamboo tree, in an attitude of the greatest despair.
“Approaching him, I asked him the cause of his grief.
“‘Alas!’ said he to me, ‘the gods are against me; everything which I undertake fails, and all evils crush me.
“‘After the one which has just befallen me only one course of action is left to me, to throw myself in the lake. But I am young, and I am weeping for myself before resolving to take such a step.’
“And he related to me how, after many attempts without success, he had at last gained a certain sum of money, the loss of which he had just experienced.
“In what way did you lose it?” I asked him.
“‘I put it in this bag.’
“‘Has some one stolen it?’
“‘No, it has slipt through this rent.’
“And he showed me a bag, whose ragged condition confirmed, and at the same time illustrated his statement.
“‘Listen,’ said I, sitting down beside him, ‘you are simply devoid of common sense, by invoking the hatred of the gods! You alone are the cause of your present misery.
“‘If you had simply reasoned before placing your money in this bag, this would not have happened to you.’
“And as he opened his eyes wide:
“‘You would have thought this,’ I resumed:
“‘The material, very much worn, is incapable of standing any weight without tearing.
“‘Now, the money which I possess is heavy, my bag is worn out.
“‘I shall not, therefore, put my money in this bag or, at least, I shall take care to line it beforehand with a solid piece of leather.
“‘From this moment,’ I proceeded, ‘there only remains one thing for you to do, always consult common sense before coming to any conclusion, and you will always succeed.
“‘As for your opinion concerning the hatred of the gods for you, if you will once more call common sense to your assistance you will reason as follows:
“‘Gracious divinities protect only wise people.
“‘Now, I have acted like a fool.
“‘It is, therefore, natural that they should turn away from me.’
“How many useless imprecations would be avoided,” adds the Shogun, “if it were given to men to know how to employ the arguments which common sense dictates, in order to distribute the weight of the mistakes committed among those who deserve the burden, without, at the same time, forgetting to assume our own share of the responsibility if we have erred.
“Nothing is more sterile than regrets or reproaches when they do not carry with them the resolution never again to fall into the same error.”
Afterward the philosopher demonstrates to us the necessity of abstracting all personality from the exercises which combine for the attainment of common sense.
“There is,” said he, “an obstacle against which all stupid people stumble; it is the act of reasoning under the influence of passion.
“Those who have not decided to renounce this method of arguing will never be able to give a just decision.
“There are self-evident facts, which certain people refuse to admit, because this statement of the truth offends their sympathies or impedes their hatreds, and they force themselves to deny the evidence, hoping thus to deceive others regarding it.
“But truth is always the strongest and they soon become the solitary dupes of their own wilful blindness.
“The man of common sense knows how to recognize falsehood wherever he meets it; he knows how vain it is to conceal a positive fact and also how dangerous it is to deceive oneself, a peril which increases in power, in proportion to the effort made to ignore it.
“He does not wish to imitate those pusillanimous people who prefer to live in the agony of doubt rather than to look misfortunes in the face. He who is determined to acquire common sense will use the following argument:
“Doubt is a conflict between two conclusions.
“So long as it exists it is impossible to adopt either.
“Serenity is unknown to those whom doubt attacks.
“To obtain peace, it is necessary to become enlightened.
“However, it is wise always to foresee the least happy issue and to prepare to support the consequences.
“The man who thinks thus will be stronger than adversity and will know how to struggle with misfortune without allowing it to master him.”
It is in these terms that Yoritomo initiates us into what he calls the mechanism of common sense; in other words, the art of acquiring by the simplest reasoning this quality dull as iron, but, like it, also solid and durable.
LESSON IX
COMMON SENSE AND ACTION
These qualities are two relatives very near of kin; but, just for this reason, they must not be confounded.
While common sense is applied to all the circumstances of life, practical sense is applicable to useful things.
Common sense admits a very subtle logic which is, at times, a little complex.
Practical sense reasons, starting from one point only; viz., material conveniences.
It is possible for this sense to be spoiled by egotism, if common sense does not come to its assistance.
It is by applying the discipline of reasoning to practical sense that it modifies simple sense perception by urging it to ally itself with logic, which unites thought to sentiment and reason.
“The association of common sense and practical sense is necessary,” says Yoritomo, “in order to produce new forms, at the same time restraining the imagination within the limits of the most exact deductions and of the most impartial judgment.”
Science is, in reality, a sort of common sense to which the rules of reasoning are applied, and is supported by arguments which practical sense directs into productive channels.
That which is called great common sense is none other than a quality with which people are endowed who show great mental equilibrium whenever it is a question of resolving material problems.
These people are generally country people or persons of humble position, whose physical organism has been developed without paying much attention to their intellectual education; they are, in fact, perfect candidates for the attainment of common sense, without having been educated to this end.
Their aptitude results from a constant habit of reflection which, rendering their attention very keen, has permitted them to observe the most minute details, therefore they can form correct conclusions, when it is a question of things that are familiar to them.
A peasant who has been taught by nature will be more skilled in prophesying about the weather than others.
He will also know how to assign a limit to the daily working hours, at the same time stating the maximum time which one can give without developing repulsion, which follows excesses of all kinds.
In his thought, very simple, but very direct, will be formulated this perfect reasoning:
Health is the first of all blessings, since without it we are incapable of appreciating the other joys of life.
If I compromise this possession I shall be insensible to all others.
It is, therefore, indispensable that I should measure my efforts, for, admitting that a certain exaggerated labor brings me a fortune, I shall not know how to enjoy it if illness accompanies it.
This is the logic which is called practical sense.
Yoritomo continues, saying that there is a very close connection between the faculty of judging and that of deducing.
“Practical sense, allied to common sense, comes to the assistance of the latter, when it is tempted to reject the chain of analogy, whose representation too often draws one far from the initial subject.
“It facilitates coordination, clearness, and precision of thought.
“It knows how to consider contingencies, and never fails to have a clear understanding of relative questions.”
And to illustrate his theory, he cites us an example which many of our young contemporaries would do well to remember.
“There was,” said he, “in the village of Fu-Isher, a literary man, who wrote beautiful poems.
“He lived in great solitude, and no one would have heard of his existence if it had not been that my master, Lang-Ho, while walking in the woods one day, was attracted by the harmonious sounds of poetry, which this young man was reciting, without thinking that he had any other listeners than the birds of the forest.
“Lang-Ho made himself known to him and began to question him.
“He learned that he did not lack ambition, but, being poor, and having no means of approaching those who would have been able to patronize him, he was singing of nature for his own pleasure, waiting patiently until he should be able to influence the powerful ones of the earth to share his appreciation.
“Lang-Ho, touched by his youth and his ardor, pointed out to him the dwelling of a prince, a patron of the arts, and, at the same time, told him how he ought to address the nobleman, assuring him that the fact of his being a messenger from a friend of the prince would open the doors of the palace to him.
“The next day the young poet presented himself at the home of the great lord, who, knowing that he had been sent by Lang-Ho, received him in spite of the fact that he was suffering intensely from a violent headache.
“He learned from the young man that he was a poet and treated him with great consideration, making him understand, however, that all sustained mental effort was insupportable to him on that day.
“But the poet, not paying attention to the prince’s exprest desire, unrolled his manuscripts and began reading an interminable ode without noticing the signs of impatience shown by his august hearer.
“He did not have the pleasure of finishing it.
“The prince, seeing that the reader did not understand his importunity, struck a gong and ordered the servant who appeared to conduct the young man out of his presence.
“Later, he declared to Lang-Ho that his protege had no talent at all, and reprimanded him severely for having sent the poet to the palace.
“But my master did not like to be thus criticized.
“So, a little while after that, one day, when that same prince was in an agreeable frame of mind, Lang-Ho invited him to the reading of one of his works.
“The nobleman declared that he had never heard anything more beautiful.
“‘That is true,’ said Lang-Ho, ‘but you ought to have said this the first time you heard it.’
“And he revealed to the prince that these verses were those of the young man whom he had judged so harshly.”
From this story two lessons may be drawn:
The first is, that if common sense indicates that judgment should not change from scorn to enthusiasm, when it is a question of the same object, practical sense insists that one should be certain of impartiality of judgment, by avoiding the influence of questions which relate to environment and surrounding circumstances.
The second concerns opportunity.
We have already had occasion to say how much some things, which seem desirable at certain times, are questionable when the situation changes.
Bad humor creates ill-will; therefore it is abominably stupid to provoke the manifestation of the second when one has proved the existence of the first.
In order that there may be a connection between the faculty of judgment and that of deduction, it is essential that nothing should be allowed to interpose itself between these two phases of the argument.
Harmony between all judgments is founded on common sense, but it is practical common sense, which indicates this harmony with precision.
It is also practical common sense which serves as a guide to the orator who wishes to impress his audience.
He will endeavor first to choose a subject which will interest those who listen to him.
In this endeavor he ought, above all, to consult opportunity.
And, as we have remarked on many occasions, the Shogun expresses theories on this subject, to which the people of the twentieth century could not give too much earnest consideration.
“There are,” said he, “social questions, as, for example, dress and custom.
“With time, opinions change, as do forms and manners, and this is quite reasonable.
“The progress of science by ameliorating the general conditions of existence, introduces a need created by civilization which rejects barbarous customs; the mentality of a warrior is not that of an agriculturist; the man who thinks about making his possessions productive has not the same inclinations as he whose life is devoted to conquest, and the sweetness of living in serenity, by modifying the aspirations, metamorphoses all things.
“In order to lead attention in the direction which is governed by reason, it is indispensable for the orator that he should expound a subject whose interpretation will satisfy the demand of opportunity, which influences every brain.
“Practical sense will make him take care to speak only of things that he has studied thoroughly.
“It will induce him to expound his theory in such a way that his hearers will have to make no effort to assimilate it.
“That which is not understood is easily criticized, and practical sense would prevent an orator from attempting to establish an argument whose premises would offend common sense.
“He would be certain of failure in such a case.
“His efforts will be limited, then, to evoking common sense, by employing practical sense, so far as what refers to the application of principles which he desires to apply successfully.”
Yoritomo recommends this affiliation for that which concerns the struggle against superstition.
“Superstition,” he says, “offends practical sense as well as common sense, for it rests on an erroneous analysis.
“Its foundation is always an observation marred by falsity, establishing an association between two facts which have nothing in common.
“There are people who reenter their homes if, when they reach the threshold, they perceive a certain bird; others believe that they are threatened with death if they meet a white cat.”
Without going back to the days of Yoritomo, we shall find just as many people who are the victims of superstitions concerning certain facts, which are only the observance of customs fallen into disuse, and whose practise has been perpetuated through the ages, altho, as we have said in the preceding chapter, the purpose of the custom has disappeared, but the custom itself has not been forgotten.
It is in this way that the origin of the superstition concerning salt dates back to the time of the Romans, who (while at variance with the principles of contemporary agriculture) sowed salt in the fields of their enemies and thought that by so doing they would make them sterile.
To that far-distant epoch can be traced the origin of the superstition concerning the spilling of salt.
Whatever may have been its cause, superstition is the enemy of common sense, for, when it does not originate in an abolished custom, it is the product of a personal impression, associating two ideas absolutely unconnected.
“Practical sense,” Yoritomo continues, “is a most valuable talent to cultivate, for it prevents our judging from appearances.
“Frivolous minds are always inclined to draw conclusions from passing impressions; they adopt neither foresight, nor precaution, nor approximation.
“There are people who will condemn a country as utterly unattractive, because they happened to have visited it under unfavorable circumstances.
“Others, without considering what a country has previously produced, and that at present the grain has not been planted, will declare unfertile the soil which has been untilled for some months.
“On the other hand, if they visit a house on a sunny day, it would be impossible for them to associate it with the idea of rain.
“It would be most difficult to make these people alter their judgment, prematurely formed, and, in spite of the most authoritative assertions and the most self-evident proofs, their initial idea will dominate all those which one would like to instil into their minds.
“One moment would, however, suffice for reason to convince them that the variations of atmosphere and the conditions of cultivation can modify the aspect of a country, of a field, and of a house, to the extent of giving them an appearance totally different from the one which they seemed to have.
“But he who judges by appearances never rejoices in the possession of that faculty which may be called reason in imagination.
“This is a gift, developed by practical sense and which common sense happily directs in right channels.
“Those who are endowed with this faculty can, with the help of reasoning, and by means of thought, build up a future reality based on a judgment whose affirmation admits of no doubt.
“It is not a question of hypothesis, no matter how well-founded it is.
“Experience, in this case, is united with deduction to form a preconceived but certain idea.
“By cultivating practical sense, we shall escape the danger of idealization which, with people of unbalanced mentality, often sheds an artificial light upon the picture.”
There is still another point to which Yoritomo calls our attention, in order to encourage us to cultivate the twin reasoning powers whose advantages we are trying to commend in this chapter:
“Practical sense,” says he, “sometimes puts common sense apparently in the wrong, while acting, however, without the inspiration of the latter.
“This happens when it is an advantage, for the perfect equilibrium of the projects in question, that it should be maintained at the same pitch, in order that it may be understood by all.
“In the legendary days, snow the color of fire once fell on the inhabitants of a little village, who were all about to attend a religious ceremony.
“One man alone, an old philosopher, had remained at home because, at the time they were to leave, he suddenly fell ill.
“When his sufferings were relieved, he started out to join the others and found them committing all sorts of follies.
“Two among them were reviling one another, each one claiming that he was the only king.
“Some were weeping because they thought that they were changed into beasts.
“Others were screaming, without rime or reason, now embracing each other, now attacking one another furiously.
“Soon the wise man recognized that they had been affected by the fall of snow, which had made them crazy, and he tried to speak to them in the language of reason.
“But all these crazy people turned on him, crying out that he had just lost his reason and that he must be shut away.
“They undertook the task of taking him back to his home, but, as that was not to be accomplished without rough usage, he assumed the part indicated by practical sense; this man of common sense feigned insanity, and from the moment the insane people thought that he resembled them they let him alone and ceased to torment him.
“The philosopher profited by this fact to disarm their excitement, and, little by little, all the time indulging in a thousand eccentricities, which had no other object than to protect himself against them, he demonstrated their aberration to them.”
Could not this story serve as an example to the majority of contemporary critics?
Is it not often necessary to appear to be denuded of common sense, to make the voice of reason dominate?
In the fable of Yoritomo, his philosopher proved his profound knowledge of the human heart, while he put in practise the power of practical sense in apparent opposition, however, to common sense.
We said this at the opening of the chapter: practical sense and common sense are two very near relatives, but they are two and not one.
LESSON X
THE MOST THOROUGH BUSINESS MAN
One of the principle advantages of common sense is that it protects the man who is gifted with it from hazardous enterprises, the risky character of which he scents.
Only to risk when possessing perfect knowledge of a subject is the sure means of never being drawn into a transaction by illusory hopes.
An exact conception of things is more indispensable to perfect success than a thousand other more brilliant but less substantial gifts.
“However,” says Yoritomo, “in order to make success our own, it is not sufficient to have the knowledge of things, one must above all know oneself.
“On the great world-stage, each one occupies a place which at the start may not always be in the first rank.
“Nevertheless, work, intelligence, directness of thought and, above all, common sense, can exert a positive influence on the future superiority of the situation.
“Before everything else, it is indispensable that we should never delude ourselves about the position which we occupy.
“To define it exactly, one should call to mind the wise adage which says: Know thyself.
“But this knowledge is rare.
“Presumptuous persons readily imagine that they attract the eyes of every one, even if they be in the last rank.
“Timid persons will hide themselves behind others and, notwithstanding, they are very much aggrieved not to be seen.
“Ambitious persons push away the troublesome ones, in order that they themselves may get the first places.
“Lazy persons just let them do it.
“Irresolute persons hesitate before sitting down in vacant places and are consumed with regrets from the time they perceive that others, better prepared, take possession of them; the more so as they no longer get back their own, for, during their hesitation, another has seated, himself there.
“Enthusiasts fight to reach the first rank, but are so fatigued by their violent struggles that they fall, tired out, before they have attained their object.
“Obstinate people persist in coveting inaccessible places and spend strength without results, which they might have employed more judiciously.
“People of common sense are the only ones who experience no nervous tension because of this struggle.
“They calculate their chances, compute the time, do not disturb themselves uselessly, and never abandon their present position until they have a firm grasp on the following place.
“They do not seek to occupy a rank which their knowledge would not permit them to keep; they draw on that faculty with which they are gifted to learn the science of true proportion.
“They do not meddle in endeavors to reform laws; they submit to them, by learning how to adapt them to their needs, and respect them by seeking to subordinate their opinion to the principle on which they are based.
“Persons who have no common sense are the only ones to revolt against the laws of the country where they live.
“The wise man will recognize that they have been enacted to protect him and that to be opposed to their observance would be acting as an enemy to oneself.”
However, people will say, if laws are so impeccable in their right to authority, how is it that their interpretation leads so often to disputes?
It is easy to reply that lawsuits are rarely instituted by men of common sense; they leave this burden to people of evil intent, who imagine thus to make a doubtful cause triumph.
It must be conceded that this means succeeds at times with them, when they are dealing with timid or irresolute persons; but those who have contracted the habit of reasoning, and who never undertake anything without consulting common sense, will never allow themselves to be drawn into the by-paths of sophistry.
If they are forced to enter there temporarily, in order to pursue the adversary, who has hidden himself there, they will leave these paths as soon as necessity does not force them to remain there longer and with delight regain the broad road of rectitude.
A few pages further on we find a reflection which the Shogun, always faithful to his principles of high morality, specially addresses to those who make a profession of humility.
“Obedience,” he says, “ought to be considered as a means; but, for the one who wishes to succeed, in no sense can it be honored as a virtue.
“If it be a question of submission to law, that is nothing else but the performance of a strict duty; this is a kind of compact which the man of common sense concludes with society, to which he promises his support for the maintenance of a protection from which he will be the first to benefit.
“This obedience might be set down as selfishness were it not endorsed by common sense.
“There are people, it is true, who, even altho wishing to support their neighbor when called upon to do so by the law, seek to evade this duty if left to themselves.
“These are pirates who have broken completely not only with the spirit of equity, but also with simple common sense.
“It is always foolish to set the example of insubordination, for, if it were followed, it would not be long before general disorder would appear.
“Some men were sitting one day on the edge of an inlet and were trying with a net to catch fish, whose playful movements the men were following through the limpid water.
“According to their character, their perseverance, their cleverness, and the ingenuity of the means employed, they caught a proportionate number of fish; but those who caught the least had one or two.
“This success encouraged them, and they began again in good earnest, each one in his own way, when a stranger appeared; he was armed with a long branch of a tree, which he plunged in the pond, touching the bottom and stirring up the mud, which, as it scattered, rose to the surface of the water.
“The limpidity of the water was immediately changed; one could no longer see the fish, and the fishermen decided to discontinue their sport.
“But the man only laughed at their discomfiture and, brandishing a large net, he threw it in his turn, chaffing them at the patient cunning by which they had, he said, taken such a poor haul.
“He brought up some fish, it is true, but at each haul he was obliged to lose so much time in removing the impurities, the debris, and the weeds of all kinds from the net that very soon the fishermen had the satisfaction of seeing him punished for his mean conduct.
“What he took was scarcely more than what the smartest among them had taken, and his net, filthy from the mud, torn by the roots that he was unable to avoid, was soon good for nothing.”
Might it not be from this fable that we have taken the expression, “to fish in troubled waters,” of which without a doubt the good Yoritomo furnished the origin many, many centuries ago?
His prophetic mind is unveiled again in the following advice that not a business man of the twentieth century would reject.
“Common sense,” he says, “when it is a question of the relations of men as to what concerns business or society, ought to adopt the characteristic of that animal called the chameleon.
“His natural color is dull, but he has the gift of reflecting the color of the objects on which he rests.
“Near a leaf, he takes the tint of hope.
“On a lotus, he is glorified with the blue of the sky.
“Is this to say that his nature changes to the point of modifying his natural color?
“No; he does not cease to possess that which recalls the color of the ground, and the ephemeral color which he appropriates is only a semblance, in order that he may be more easily mistaken for the objects themselves.
“The man who boasts of possessing common sense, altho preserving his personality, ought not to fail, if he wants to succeed, to reflect that of the person whom he wishes to aid him in succeeding.”
Let it not be understood for a moment, that we advise any one to act contrary to the impulses of justice.
But cleverness is a part of common sense in business, and assimilation is essential to success.
It is not necessary to abandon one’s convictions in order to reflect principles which, without contradicting them, give them a favorable color.
Common sense can remain intact and be differently colored, according as it is applied to the arts, politics, or science.
It would not deserve its name if it did not know how to yield to circumstances, in order to adorn the momentary caprice with flowers of reason.
In the primitive ages, common sense consisted in keeping oneself in a perpetual state of defense; attack was also at times prescribed, by virtue of the principle that it is pernicious to allow one’s rights to be imperiled.
Attack was also at times a form of repression.
It was also a lesson in obedience and a reminder not to misunderstand individual rights.
In later times, common sense served to make the advantages of harmony appreciated.
It directed the descendants of peoples exclusively warlike toward the secret place where science unfolds itself to the gaze of the vulgar; then it taught them to provide for their existence by working.
It has demonstrated to them the necessity of reflection, by inciting them to model their present course of life on the lessons which come from the past.
It has given them the means to evoke it easily and effectively.
It has injected into their veins the calmness which permits them to draw just conclusions and to adopt toward preceding reasonings the attitude of absolute neutrality, without which all former presentiments are marred by error.
Each epoch was, for common sense, an opportunity to manifest itself differently.
At the moment when poetry was highly honored, it would have been unreasonable to have ignored it, for the bards excited great enthusiasm by their songs which gave birth to heroes.
And now, imbued with the principles which in his day might be taken to represent what we to-day call advanced ideas, Yoritomo continues:
“Common sense can, then, without renouncing its devotion to truth, take various forms or shades, for the truth of yesterday is not always the truth of to-day.
“The gods of the past are considered simply as idols in our day and the virtues of the distant past would be, at present, moral defects which would prevent men from winning the battle of life, whose ideal is The Best for which all the faculties should strive.”
The Shogun also touches lightly on a subject which, already discust in his time, has become, in our day, a burning truth; it is a question of a fault, which in the world of practical life and in that of business can cause considerable injury to him who allows it to be implanted in him.
We refer to that tendency which has been adorned or rather branded successively with the names of hypochondria, pessimism, and lastly neurasthenia, an appellation which comprises all kinds of nervous diseases, the characteristic of which is incurable melancholy.
“There are people,” he says, “who are afflicted with a special color-blindness.
“Everything they look at assumes immediately to their eyes the most somber hues.
“They see in a flower only the germ of dry-rot; the most ideal beauty appears to them only like the negligible covering of some hideous skeleton.
“However, they hang on to this life which they do not cease to calumniate, and people of common sense are rarely found who will try to reason with them from a common-sense standpoint:
“‘Since life is so insupportable to you, why do you impose upon yourself the obligation to struggle with it?
“‘Only insane people try to prolong their sojourn in a place where they suffer martyrdom.’
“It is true that when, perchance, this argument is placed before them, they do not fail to reply by invoking the shame of desertion.
“‘Well, is not then the interest of the struggle to which we are subjected a sufficient attraction to keep us at our post?'”
And, always enamored with the doctrine, which we are now assiduously maintaining, he concludes:
“Common sense is, at times, the unfolding of a magnificent force which incites us to attune our environment to actualities.
“One must not, however, fall into excess and draw a huge sword to pierce the clouds, which obscure the sun.
“If struggle is praiseworthy when we have to face a real enemy, it becomes worthy of scorn and laughter if we attack a puerile or imaginary adversary.
“But the number of people incapable of appreciating the true color of things is not limited to those who enshroud them in black.
“There are others, on the contrary, who obstinately insist upon surrounding them with a halo of sunlight only existing in their imagination.
“For such deluded people, obstacles seen from a distance take on the most attractive appearance; they would be readily disposed to enjoy them and only consent to allow them a certain importance if they absolutely obstruct the way.
“But until the moment when impossibility confronts them, do they deny its existence or underrate its importance by attributing a favorable influence to it.
“This propensity to see all in the ideal would be enviable if it did not wound common sense, which revenges itself by refusing to these improvident people the help of the reasoning power necessary to sustain them in the crisis of discouragement which brings about irresistibly the establishment of error.
“These unbalanced people rarely experience success, for they are unable, as long as their blindness lasts, to mark out a line of serious conduct for themselves.
“All projects built on the quicksands of false deductions will perish without even leaving behind them material sufficient to reconstruct them.
“It is impossible to combat strongly enough this tendency to self-delusion, which inclines us to become the prey of untruth, by preventing the birth of faith, based on preceding success.
“Sincere conviction, on the contrary, will lead us to refute strongly all the false arguments, which impede thought and would choke it in order to allow unadulterated pleasure to be installed on the ruins of common sense.
“The battle of life demands warriors and conquerors as well as critics, less brilliant, perhaps, but just as worthy of admiration, for their mission is equally important, altho infinitely more obscure.
“Whether he be a peasant tilling his field or a rich capitalist manipulating his gold, he who works in order to satisfy the needs or luxury of his existence is a fighter whose hours are spent in occupations more or less dangerous.
“From time to time, however, a cessation of hostilities is produced; such always follows the appearance of common sense which, by giving to things their true proportions, causes the greater part of inequalities to disappear.
“Finally, he who cultivates this virtue unostentatiously will always be protected from the caprices of fortune; if he is poor, common sense will indicate to him the way to cease to be poor, and, if chance has given him birth in opulence, the counsels of experience will demonstrate to him the frailty of possessions that one has not acquired by personal effort.”
This conclusion is strikingly true, for it is certain that prosperity attained by personal effort is less likely to fade away than an inherited fortune, whose owner can only understand the ordinary pleasure of a possession which he has not ardently desired.
He who is the maker of his own position is more able to maintain it; he knows the price of the efforts which he had to make in order to construct it, and, armed with common sense, he is as able to defend his treasure as to enjoy the sweet savor of a thing which he has desired, longed for, and won by the force of his will and judgment, placed at the service of circumstances and directed toward success.
LESSON XI
COMMON SENSE AND SELF-CONTROL
“Where life manifests itself,” says Yoritomo, “antagonism always springs up.”
“In the eternal struggle between the individual and social soul, each of which, in its turn, is victorious or vanquished, a truce is declared only