“Go to it!” laughed the D.A. “Eat him alive! We’re throwing him to the lions!”
“No decent lion would want him!” retorted Mr. Tutt. “He might maul him a little, but I won’t. I’m just going to give him a full opportunity to test his little proposition that the institutions of these jolly old United States are perfectly adapted to settle quarrels among all the polyglot prevaricators of the world and administer justice among people who are still in a barbarous or at least in a patriarchal state. He’s young, and he don’t understand that a New York merchant is entirely too conscientious to find a man guilty on testimony that he would discount heavily in his own business.”
“Go as far as you like,” laughed Peckham.
“Oh, I’m only going as far as Bagdad,” answered Mr. Tutt.
Deputy Assistant District Attorney Pepperill complacently set about the preparation of his case, utterly unconscious of the dangers with which his legal path was beset. As he sat at his shiny oaken desk and pressed the button that summoned the stenographer it seemed to him the simplest thing in the world to satisfy any jury of what had taken place and the summit of impudent audacity on the part of Mr. Tutt to have suggested that Hassoun should be dealt with otherwise than a first-degree murderer. And it should be added parenthetically that W.M.P., in spite of his New England temperament, had a burning ambition to send somebody to the electric chair.
In truth, on its face the story as related by Fajala Mokarzel and the other friends of Sardi Babu the deceased pillow-sham vender was simplicity itself. Besides Sardi Babu and Mokarzel there had been Nicola Abbu, the confectioner; Menheem Shikrie, the ice-cream vendor; Habu Kahoots, the showman; and David Elias, a pedler. All six of them, as they claimed, had been sitting peacefully in Ghabryel & Assad’s restaurant, eating _kibbah arnabeiah_ and _mamoul_. Sardi had ordered _sheesh kabab_. It was about nine o’clock in the evening, and they were talking politics and drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes.
Suddenly Kasheed Hassoun, accompanied by a smaller and much darker man, had entered and striding up to the table exclaimed in a threatening manner: “Where is he who did say that he would spit upon the beard of my bishop?”
Thereupon Sardi Babu had risen and answered: “Behold, I am he.”
Immediately Kasheed Hassoun, and while his accomplice held them at bay with a revolver, had leaned across the table and grabbing Sardi by the throat had broken his neck. Then the smaller man had fired off his pistol and both of them had run away. The simplest story ever told. There was everything the law required to send any murderer to the chair, and little Mr. Pepperill had a diagram made of the inside of the restaurant and a photograph of the outside of it, and stamped the indictment in purple ink: Ready for Trial.
Contemporaneously Mr. Tutt was giving his final instructions to Mr. Bonnie Doon, his stage manager, director of rehearsals and general superintendent of arrangements in all cases requiring an extra-artistic touch.
“It’s too bad we can’t cart a few hundred cubic feet of the Sahara into the court room and divert the Nile down Center Street, but I guess you can produce sufficient atmosphere,” he said.
“I could all right–if I had a camel,” remarked Bonnie.
“Atmosphere is necessary,” continued Mr. Tutt. “Real atmosphere! Have ’em in native costume–beads, red slippers, hookahs, hoochi-koochis.”
“I get you,” replied Mr. Doon. “You want a regular Turkish village. Well, we’ll have it all right. I’ll engage the entire Streets of Cairo production from Coney and have Franklin Street crowded with goats, asses and dromedaries. I might even have a caravan pitch its tents alongside the Tombs.”
“You can’t lay it on too strong,” declared Mr. Tutt. “But you don’t need to go off Washington Street. And, Bonnie, remember–I want every blessed Turk, Greek, Armenian, Jew, Arab, Egyptian and Syrian that saw Sardi Babu kill Kasheed Hassoun.”
“You mean who saw Kasheed Hassoun kill Sardi Babu,” corrected Bonnie.
“Well–whichever way it was,” agreed Mr. Tutt.
When at length the great day of the trial arrived Judge Wetherell, ascending the bench in Part Thirteen, was immediately conscious of a subtle Oriental smell that emanated from no one could say where, but which none the less permeated the entire court room. It seemed to be a curious compound of incense, cabbage, garlic and eau de cologne, with a suggestion of camel. The room was entirely filled with Syrians. One row of benches was occupied by a solemn group of white-bearded patriarchs who looked as if they had momentarily paused on a pilgrimage to Mecca. All over the room rose the murmur of purring Arabic. The stenographer was examining a copy of Meraat-ul-Gharb, the clerk a copy of El Zeman, and in front of the judge’s chair had been laid a copy of Al-Hoda.
His honor gave a single sniff, cast his eye over the picturesque throng, and said: “Pst! Captain! Open that window!” Then he picked up the calendar and read: “‘People versus Kasheed Hassoun–Murder.'”
The stenographer was humming to himself:
_Bagdad is a town in Turkey
On a camel tall and jerky_.
“Are both sides ready to try this case?” inquired Judge Wetherell, choking a yawn. He was a very stout judge and he could not help yawning.
Deputy Assistant District Attorney Pepperill and Mr. Tutt rose in unison, declaring that they were. At or about this same moment the small door in the rear of the room opened and an officer appeared, leading in Kasheed Hassoun. He was an imposing man, over six feet in height, of dignified carriage, serious mien, and finely chiseled features. Though he was dressed as a European there was nevertheless something indefinably suggestive of the East in the cut of his clothes; he wore no waistcoat and round his waist was wound a strip of crimson cloth. His black eyes glinted through lowering brows, wildly, almost fiercely, and he strode haughtily beside his guard like some unbroken stallion of the desert.
“Well, you may as well proceed to select a jury,” directed the court, putting on his glasses and studying his copy of Al-Hoda with interest. Presently he beckoned to Pepperill.
“Have you seen this?” he asked.
“No, Your Honor. What is it?”
“It’s a newspaper published by these people,” explained His Honor. “Rather amusing, isn’t it?”
“I didn’t know they had any special newspaper of their own,” admitted Pepperill.
“They’ve got eight right in New York,” interjected the stenographer.
“I notice that this paper is largely composed of advertisements,” commented Wetherell. “But the advertisers are apparently scattered all over the world–Chicago; Pittsburgh; Canton; Winnipeg; Albuquerque; Brooklyn; Tripoli; Greenville, Texas; Pueblo; Lawrence, Massachusetts; Providence, Rhode Island; Fall River; Detroit–“
“Here’s one from Roxbury, Massachusetts, and another from Mexico City,” remarked the clerk delightedly.
“And here’s one from Paris, France,” added the stenographer. “Say! Some travelers!”
“Well, go on getting the jury,” said the judge, yawning again and handing the paper to the clerk.
At that moment Mr. Salim Zahoul, the interpreter procured by Mr. Pepperill, approached, bowed and, twisting his purple mustache, addressed the court: “Your Excellence: I haf to zay dat dees papaire eet haf articles on zis affair–ze _memkaha_–zat are not diplomatique.”
Judge Wetherell blinked at him.
“Who’s this man?” he demanded.
“That’s the interpreter,” explained W.M.P.
“Interpreter!” answered the court. “I can’t understand a word he says!”
“He was the best I could get,” apologized Pepperill, while the countenance of Mr. Zahoul blazed with wrath and humiliation. “It’s very difficult to get a fluent interpreter in Arabic.”
“Well, just interpret what _he_ says to _me_, will you?” kindly requested His Honor.
“I zay,” suddenly exploded Zahoul–“dees papaire eet half contemptuous article on ze _menkaha_ zat dees Kasheed Hassoun not kill dees Sardi Babu!”
“He says,” translated Pepperill, “that the newspaper contains an indiscreet article in favor of the defense. I had no idea there would be any improper attempt to influence the jury.”
“What difference does it make, anyway?” inquired His Honor. “You don’t expect any juryman is going to read that thing, do you? Why, it looks as if a bumblebee had fallen into an ink bottle and then had a fit all over the front page.”
“I don’t suppose–” began Pepperill.
“Go on and get your jury!” admonished the court.
So the lion and the lamb in the shape of Mr. Tutt and Pepperill proceeded to select twelve gentlemen to pass upon the issue who had never been nearer to Syria than the Boardwalk at Atlantic City and who only with the utmost attention could make head or tail of what Mr. Salim Zahoul averred that the witnesses were trying to say. Moreover, most of the talesmen evinced a profound distrust of their own ability to do justice between the People and the defendant and a curious desire to be relieved from service. However, at last the dozen had been chosen and sworn, the congestion of the court room slightly relieved, Mr. Zahoul somewhat appeased, and Mr. William Montague Pepperill rose to outline his very simple case to the jury.
There was, he explained, no more difficulty in administering justice in the case of a foreigner than of anyone else. All were equal in the eyes of the law–equally presumed to be innocent, equally responsible when proved guilty. And he would prove Kasheed Hassoun absolutely guilty–guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, beyond any doubt. He would produce five–five reputable witnesses who would swear that Hassoun had murdered Sardi Babu; and he prophesied that he would unhesitatingly demand at the end of the trial such an unequivocal, fearless, honest expression of their collective opinion as would permanently fix Mr. Kasheed Hassoun so that he could do no more harm. He expressed it more elegantly but that was the gist of it. He himself was as sincere and honest in his belief in his ability to establish the truth of his claim as he was in the justice of his cause. Alas, he was far too young to realize that there is a vast difference between knowing the truth and being able to demonstrate what it is!
In proper order he called the photographer who had taken the picture of the restaurant, the draftsman who had made the diagram of the interior, the policeman who had arrested Hassoun, the doctor who had performed the official autopsy upon the unfortunate Babu, and the five Syrians who had been present when the crime was perpetrated. Each swore by all that was holy that Kasheed Hassoun had done exactly as outlined by Assistant District Attorney Pepperill–and swore it word for word, _verbatim et literatim, in iisdem verbis, sic_, and yet again exactly. Their testimony mortised and tenoned in a way to rejoice a cabinet-maker’s heart. And at first to the surprise and later to the dismay of Mr. Pepperill, old man Tutt asked not one of them a single question about the murder. Instead he merely inquired in a casual way where they came from, how they got there, what they did for a living, and whether they had ever made any contradictory statement as to what had occurred, and as his cross-examination of Mr. Habu Kahoots was typical of all the rest it may perhaps be set forth as an example, particularly as Mr. Kahoots spoke English, which the others did not.
“And den,” asserted Mr. Kahoots stolidly, “Kasheed Hassoun, he grab heem by ze troat and break hees neck.”
He was a short, barrel-shaped man with curly ringlets, fat, bulging cheeks, heavy double chin and enormous paunch, and he wore a green worsted waistcoat and his fingers were laden with golden rings.
“Ah!” said Mr. Tutt complaisantly. “You saw all that exactly as you have described it?”
“Where were you born?”
“How long have you been in the United States?”
“Where do you live?”
“What’s your business?”
Mr. Kahoots visibly expanded.
“I have street fair and carnival of my own. I have electric theater, old plantation, Oriental show, snake exhibit and merry-go-round.”
“Well, well!” exclaimed Mr. Tutt. “You are certainly a capitalist! I hope you are not financially overextended!”
Mr. Pepperill looked pained, not knowing just how to prevent such jocoseness on the part of his adversary.
“I object,” he muttered feebly.
“Quite properly!” agreed Mr. Tutt. “Now, Mr. Kahoots, are you a citizen of the United States?”
Mr. Kahoots looked aggrieved.
“Me? No! Me no citizen. I go back sometime Acre and build moving-picture garden and ice-cream palace.”
“I thought so,” commented Mr. Tutt. “Now what, pray, were you doing in the Washington Street restaurant?”
“Eating _kibbah arnabeiah_ and _mamoul_.”
“I mean if you live in Augusta how did you happen to be in New York at precisely that time?”
“How you come in New York?” translated Mr. Tutt, while the jury laughed.
“Yes, yes; but you didn’t come on just to be present at the murder, did you?”
“I just come to walk up and down.”
“Where–walk up and down?”
“On Washington Street. I spend the winter. I do nothing. I rich man.”
“How long did you stay when you just came on?”
“Tree days. Then I go back.”
“Why did you go back?”
“I dunno. Just go back.”
Mr. Tutt sighed. The jury gave signs of impatience.
“Look here!” he demanded. “How many times have you gone over your story with the district attorney?”
“I nevvair see heem.”
“Never see whom?”
“I’m not talking about the judge.”
“I nevvair see no one.”
“Didn’t you tell the Grand Jury that Hassoun stabbed Babu with a long knife?”
“I dunno heem!”
“Didn’t you go into a big room and put your hand on a book and swear?”
“I no swear–ever!”
“And tell what you saw?”
“I tell what I saw.”
“What did you see?”
“I saw Hassoun break heem hees neck.”
“Didn’t you say first that Hassoun stabbed Babu?”
“Then didn’t you come back and say he shot him?”
“And finally, didn’t you say he strangled him–after you had heard that the coroner’s physician had decided that that was how he was killed?”
“Yes–he break heem hees neck.”
Mr. Kahoots was apparently very much bored, but he was not bored in quite the same way as the judge, who, suddenly rousing himself, asked Mr. Tutt if he had any basis for asking such questions.
“Why, certainly,” answered the old lawyer quietly. “I shall prove that this witness made three absolutely contradictory statements before the Grand Jury.”
“Is that so, Mister District Attorney?”
“I don’t know,” replied Pepperill faintly. “I had nothing to do with the proceedings before the Grand Jury.”
Judge Wetherell frowned.
“It would seem to me,” he began, “as if a proper preparation of the case would have involved some slight attention to–Well, never mind! Proceed, Mr. Tutt.”
“Kahoots!” cried the lawyer sternly. “Isn’t it a fact that you have been convicted of crime yourself?”
The proprietor of the merry-go-round drew himself up indignantly.
“Weren’t you convicted of assault on a man named Rafoul Rabyaz?”
“Me? Look here, sir! I tell you ’bout dat! This Rafoul Rabyaz he my partner, see, in pool, billiard and cigar business on Greenwich Street. This long time ago. Years ago. We split up. I sell heem my shares, see. I open next door–pool table, cafe and all. But I not get full half the stock. I not get the tablecloth, see. I was of the tablecloth you know short. It don’t be there. I go back there that time. I see heem. I say, ‘We don’t count those tablecloth.’ He say, ‘Yes.’ I say,’No.’ He say,’Yes.’ I say ‘No.’ He say, ‘Yes.’ I say, ‘No’–“
“For heaven’s sake,” exclaimed Judge Wetherell, “don’t say that again!”
“Yes, sair,” agreed the showman. “All right. I say, ‘No.’ I say, ‘You look in the book.’ He say, ‘No.’ We each take hold of the cloth. I have a knife. I cut cloth in two. I give heem half. I take half. I say, ‘You take half; I take half.’ He say, ‘Go to hell!'”
He waved his hand definitively.
“Well?” inquired Mr. Tutt anxiously.
“Dat’s all!” answered Mr. Kahoots.
One of the jurymen suddenly coughed and thrust his handkerchief into his mouth.
“Then you stuck your knife into him, didn’t you?” suggested Mr. Tutt.
Mr. Tutt shrugged his shoulders and pursed his lips.
“You were convicted, weren’t you?”
“I call twenty witness!” announced Mr. Kahoots with a grand air.
“You don’t need to!” retorted Mr. Tutt. “Now tell us why you had to leave Syria?”
“I go in camel business at Coney Island,” answered the witness demurely.
“What!” shouted the lawyer. “Didn’t you run away from home because you were convicted of the murder of Fatima, the daughter of Abbas?”
“Me? No!” Mr. Kahoots looked shocked.
Mr. Tutt bent over and spoke to Bonnie Doon, who produced from a leather bag a formidable document on parchment-like paper covered with inscriptions in Arabic and adorned with seals and ribbons.
“I have here, Your Honor,” said he, “the record of this man’s conviction in the Criminal Court in Beirut, properly exemplified by our consuls and the embassy at Constantinople. I have had it translated, but if Mr. Pepperill prefers to have the interpreter read it–“
“Show it to the district attorney!” directed His Honor.
Pepperill looked at it helplessly.
“You may read your own translation,” said the court drowsily.
Mr. Tutt bowed, took up the paper and faced the jury.
“This is the official record,” he announced. “I will read it.
“‘In the name of God.
“‘On a charge of the murder of the gendarmes Nejib Telhoon and Abdurrahman and Ibrahim Aisha and Fatima, daughter of Hason Abbas, of the attack on certain nomads, of having fired on them with the intent of murder, of participation and assistance in the act of murder, of having shot on the regular troops, of assisting in the escape of some offenders and of having drawn arms on the regular troops, during an uprising on Sunday, January 24, 1303–Mohammedan style–between the inhabitants of the Mezreatil-Arab quarter in Beirut and the nomads who had pitched their tents near by, the following arrested persons, namely–Metri son of Habib Eljemal and Habib son of Mikael Nakash and Hanna son of Abdallah Elbaitar and Elias Esad Shihada and Tanous son of Jerji Khedr and Habib son of Aboud Shab and Elias son of Metri Nasir and Khalil son of Mansour Maoud and Nakhle son of Elias Elhaj and Nakhle son of Berkat Minari and Antoon son of Berkat Minari and Lutfallah son of Jerji-Kefouri and Jabran Habib Bishara and Kholil son of Lutf Dahir and Nakhle Yousif Eldefoumi, all residents of the said quarter and Turkish subjects, and their companions, sixty-five fugitives, namely–Isbir Bedoon son of Abdallah Zerik and Elias son of Kanan Zerik and Amin Matar and Jerji Ferhan alias Baldelibas and Habu son of Hanna Kahoots and–‘”
Deputy Assistant District Attorney Pepperill started doubtfully to his feet.
“If the court please,” he murmured in a sickly voice, “I object. In the first place I don’t know anything about this record–and I object to it on that ground; and in the second place a trial and conviction in the absence of a defendant under our law is no conviction at all.”
“But this man is a Turkish subject and it’s a good conviction in Turkey,” argued Mr. Tutt.
“Well, it isn’t here!” protested Pepperill.
“You’re a little late, aren’t you?” inquired His Honor. “It has all been read to the jury. However, I’ll entertain a motion to strike out–“
“I should like to be heard on the question,” said Mr. Tutt quickly. “This is an important matter.”
Unexpectedly a disgruntled-looking talesman in the back row held up his hand.
“I’d like to ask a question myself,” he announced defiantly, almost arrogantly, after the manner of one with a grievance. “I’m a hard-working business man. I’ve been dragged here against my will to serve on this jury and decide if this defendant murdered somebody or other. I don’t see what difference it makes whether or not this witness cut a tablecloth in two or murdered Fatima, the daughter of What’s his Name. I want to go home–sometime. If it is in order I’d like to suggest that we get along.”
Judge Wetherell started and peered with a puzzled air at this bold shatterer of established procedure.
“Mister Juryman,” said he severely, “these matters relate directly to the credibility of the witness. They are quite proper. I–I–am–surprised–“
“But, Your Honor,” expostulated the iconoclast upon the back row, “I guess nobody is going to waste much time over this Turkish snake charmer! Ain’t there a policeman or somebody we can believe who saw what happened?”
“Bang!” went the judicial gavel.
“The juryman will please be silent!” shouted Judge Wetherell. “This is entirely out of order!” Then he quickly covered his face with his handkerchief. “Proceed!” he directed in a muffled tone.
“Where were we?” asked Mr. Tutt dreamily.
“Fatima, the daughter of Abbas,” assisted the foreman, sotto voce.
“And I objected to Fatima, the daughter of Abbas!” snapped Pepperill.
“Well, well!” conceded Mr. Tutt. “She’s dead, poor thing! Let her be. That is all, Mr. Kahoots.”
It is difficult to describe the intense excitement these digressions from the direct testimony occasioned among the audience. The reference to the billiard-table cover and the murder of the unfortunate Fatima apparently roused long-smoldering fires. A group of Syrians by the window broke into an unexpected altercation, which had to be quelled by a court officer, and when quiet was restored the jury seemed but slightly attentive to the precisely similar yarns of Nicola Abbu, Menheem Shikrie, Fajal Mokarzel and David Elias, especially as the minutes of the Grand Jury showed that they had sworn to three entirely different sets of facts regarding the cause of Babu’s death. Yet when the People rested it remained true that five witnesses, whatever the jury may have thought of them, had testified that Hassoun strangled Sardi Babu. The jury turned expectantly to Mr. Tutt to hear what he had to say.
“Gentlemen,” he said quietly, “the defense is very simple. None of the witnesses who have appeared here was in fact present at the scene of the homicide at all. I shall call some ten or twelve reputable Syrian citizens who will prove to you that Kasheed Hassoun, my client, with a large party of friends was sitting quietly in the restaurant when Sardi Babu came in with a revolver in his hand, which he fired at Hassoun, and that then, and only then, a small dark man whose identity cannot be established–evidently a stranger–seized Babu before he could fire again, and killed him–in self-defense.”
Mr. William Montague Pepperill’s jaw dropped as if he had seen the ghost of one of his colonial ancestors. He could not believe that he had heard Mr. Tutt correctly. Why, the old lawyer had the thing completely turned round! Sardi Babu hadn’t gone to the restaurant. He had been in the restaurant, and it had been Kasheed Hassoun who had gone there.
Yet, one by one, placidly, imperturbably, the dozen witnesses foretold by Mr. Tutt, and gathered in by Bonnie Doon, marched to the chair and swore upon the Holy Bible that it was even as Mr. Tutt had said, and that no such persons as Mokarzel, Kahoots, Abbu, Shikrie and Elias had been in the restaurant at any time that evening, but on the contrary that they, the friends of Hassoun, had been there eating Turkish pie–a few might have had mashed beans with _taheenak_–when Sardi Babu, apparently with suicidal intent, entered alone to take vengeance upon the camel owner.
“That is all. That is our case,” said Mr. Tutt as the last Syrian left the stand.
But there was no response from the bench. Judge Wetherell had been dozing peacefully for several hours. Even Pepperill could not avoid a decorous smile. Then the clerk pulled out the copy of Al-Hoda and rustled it, and His Honor, who had been dreaming that he was riding through the narrow streets of Bagdad upon a jerky white dromedary so tall that he could peek through the latticed balconies at the plump, black-eyed odalisques within the harems, slowly came back from Turkey to New York.
“Gentlemen of the jury,” said he, pulling himself together, “the defendant here is charged by the Grand Jury with having murdered Fatima the daughter of Abbas–I beg your pardon! I mean–who was it?–one Sardi Babu. I will first define to you the degrees of homicide–“
* * * * *
One day three months later, after Kasheed Hassoun had been twice tried upon the same testimony and the jury had disagreed–six to six, each time–Mr. Tutt, who had overstayed his lunch hour at the office, put on his stovepipe hat and strolled along Washington Street, looking for a place to pick up a bite to eat. It was in the middle of the afternoon and most of the stores were empty, which was all the more to his liking. He had always wanted to try some of that Turkish pie that they had all talked so much about at the trial. Presently a familiar juxtaposition of names caught his eye–Ghabryel & Assad. The very restaurant which had been the scene of the crime! Curiously, he turned in there. Like all the other places it was deserted, but at the sound of his footsteps a little Syrian boy not more than ten years old came from behind the screen at the end of the room and stood bashfully awaiting his order.
Mr. Tutt smiled one of his genial weather-beaten smiles at the youngster and glancing idly over the bill of fare ordered _biklama_ and coffee. Then he lit a stogy and stretched his long legs comfortably out under the narrow table. Yes, this was the very spot where either Sardi Babu and his friends had been sitting the night of the murder or Kasheed Hassoun and his friends–one or the other; he wondered if anybody would ever know which. Was it possible that in this humdrum little place human passions had been roused to the taking of life on account of some mere difference in religious dogma? Was this New York? Was it possible to Americanize these people? A door clattered in the rear, and from behind the screen again emerged the boy carrying a tray of pastry and coffee.
“Well, my little man,” said Mr. Tutt, “do you work here?”
“Oh, yes,” answered the embryonic citizen. “My father, he owns half the store. I go to school every day, but I work here afterward. I got a prize last week.”
“What sort of a prize?”
“I got the English prize.”
The lawyer took the child’s hand and pulled him over between his knees. He was an attractive lad, clean, responsive, frank, and his eyes looked straight into Mr. Tutt’s.
“Sonny,” he inquired his new friend, “are you an American?”
“Me? Sure! You bet I’m an American! The old folks–no! You couldn’t change ’em in fifty years. They’re just what they always were. They don’t want anything different. They think they’re in Syria yet. But me–say, what do you think? Of course I’m an American!”
“That’s right!” answered Mr. Tutt, offering him a piece of pastry. “And what is your name?”
“George Nasheen Assad,” answered the boy, showing a set of white teeth.
“Well, George,” continued the attorney, “what has become of Kasheed Hassoun?”
“Oh, he’s down at Coney Island. He runs a caravan. He has six camels. I go there sometimes and he lets me ride for nothing. I know who you are,” said the little Syrian confidently, as he took the cake. “You’re the great lawyer who defended Kasheed Hassoun.”
“That’s right. How did you know that, now?”
“I was to the trial.”
“Do you think he ought to have been let off?” asked Mr. Tutt whimsically.
“I don’t know,” returned the child. “I guess you did right not to call me as a witness.”
Mr. Tutt wrinkled his brows.
“Eh? What? You weren’t a witness, were you?”
“Of course I was!” laughed George. “I was here behind the screen. I saw the whole thing. I saw Kasheed Hassoun come in and speak to Sardi Babu, and I saw Sardi draw his revolver, and I saw Kasheed tear it out of his hand and strangle him.”
Mr. Tutt turned cold.
“You saw that?” he challenged.
“How many other people were there in the restaurant?” inquired Mr. Tutt.
“Nobody at all,” answered George in a matter-of-fact tone. “Only Kasheed and Sardi. Nobody else was in the restaurant.”
Contempt of Court
The court can’t determine what is honor.–Chief Baron Bowes, 1743.
I know what my code of honor is, my lord, and I intend to adhere to it.–John O’Conner, M.P., in Parnell Commission’s Proceedings, 103d Day; Times Rep. pt. 28, pp. 19 _ff_.
Well, honor is the subject of my story.–Julius Caesar, Act I, Sc 2.
“What has become of Katie–the second waitress?” asked Miss Althea Beekman of Dawkins, her housekeeper, as she sat at her satinwood desk after breakfast. “I didn’t see her either last night or this morning.”
Dawkins, who was a mid-Victorian, flushed awkwardly.
“I really had to let the girl go, ma’am!” she explained with an outraged air. “I hardly know how to tell you–such a thing in this house! I couldn’t possibly have her round. I was afraid she might corrupt the other girls, ma’am–and they are such a self-respecting lot–almost quite ladylike, ma’am. So I simply paid her and told her to take herself off.”
Miss Beekman looked pained.
“You shouldn’t have turned her out into the street like that, Dawkins!” she expostulated. “Where has she gone?”
Dawkins gazed at her large feet in embarrassment.
“I don’t know, ma’am,” she admitted. “I didn’t suppose you’d want her here so I sent her away. It was quite inconvenient, too–with the servant problem what it is. But I’m hoping to get another this afternoon from Miss Healey’s.”
Miss Beekman was genuinely annoyed.
“I am seriously displeased with you, Dawkins!” she returned severely. “Of course, I am shocked at any girl in my household misbehaving herself, but–I–wouldn’t want her to be sent away–under such circumstances. It would be quite heartless. Yes, I am very much disturbed!”
“I’m sorry, ma’am,” answered the housekeeper penitently. “But I was only thinking of the other girls.”
“Well, it’s too late to do anything about it now,” repeated her mistress. “But I’m sorry, Dawkins; very sorry, indeed. We have responsibilities toward these people! However–this is Thursday, isn’t it?–we’ll have veal for lunch as usual–and she was so pretty!” she added inconsequently.
“H’m. That was the trouble!” sniffed the housekeeper. “We’re well rid of her. You’d think a girl would have some consideration for her employer–if nothing else. In a sense she is a guest in the house and should behave herself as such!”
“Yes, that is quite true!” agreed her employer. “Still–yes, Brown Betty is very well for dessert. That will do, Dawkins.”
Behind the curtain of this casual conversation had been enacted a melodrama as intensely vital and elemental as any of Shakespeare’s tragedies, for the day Dawkins had fired Katie O’Connell–“for reasons,” as she said–and told her to go back where she came from or anywhere she liked for that matter, so long as she got out of her sight, Katie’s brother Shane in the back room of McManus’ gin palace gave Red McGurk–for the same “reasons”–a certain option and, the latter having scornfully declined to avail himself of it, had then and there put a bullet through his neck. But this, naturally, Miss Beekman did not know.
As may have been already surmised Miss Althea was a gracious, gentle and tender-hearted lady who never knowingly would have done a wrong to anybody and who did not believe that simply because God had been pleased to call her into a state of life at least three stories higher than her kitchen she was thereby relieved from her duty toward those who occupied it. Nevertheless, from the altitude of those three stories she viewed them as essentially different from herself, for she came of what is known as “a long line of ancestors.” As, however, Katie O’Connell and Althea Beekman were practically contemporaries, it is somewhat difficult to understand how one of them could have had a succession of ancestors that was any longer than that of the other. Indeed, Miss Beekman’s friend, Prof. Abelard Samothrace, of Columbia University, probably would have admitted that just as the two had lived in the same house–albeit at different levels–on Fifth Avenue, so their forebears at some prehistoric period had, likely as not, occupied the same cave and had in company waded on frosty mornings the ice-skimmed swamps of Mittel Europa in pursuit of the cave bear, the mastodon and the woolly rhinoceros, and for afternoon relaxation had made up twosomes for hunting wives with stone clubs instead of mashies in their hairy prehensile hands.
It would seem, therefore, that–whatever of tradition might have originated in the epoch in question–glimmerings of sportsmanship, of personal pride, of tribal duty or of conscience ought to have been the common heritage of them both. For it was assuredly true that while Miss Katie’s historic ancestors had been Celtiberians, clad on occasion only in a thin coating of blue paint, Miss Althea’s had dwelt in the dank marshes of the Elbe and had been unmistakably Teutonic, though this curse had been largely removed by racial intermarriage during subsequent thousands of years. Indeed, it may well have been that in the dimmer past some Beekman serf on bended knee had handed a gilded harp to some King O’Connell on his throne. If the O’Connells were foreigners the Beekmans, from the point of view of the aboriginal American, were no less so simply because they had preceded them by a couple of hundred years.
Tradition is not a matter of centuries but of ages. If Katie inherited some of hers from the peat bogs adjacent to Tara’s Halls in that remote period when there were still snakes in Ireland, Miss Althea had vicariously acquired others from the fur-clad barbarians described by Tacitus who spent their leisure time in drinking, gambling or splitting each other’s skulls with stone mallets. On this subject see Spencer’s “Data of Ethics” and Lecky’s “History of European Morals.” But all this entirely escaped Miss Althea, who suffered from the erroneous impression that because she was a Beekman and lived in a stone mansion facing Central Park she differed fundamentally not only from the O’Connells but from the Smiths, the Pasquales, the Ivanovitches and the Ginsbergs, all of whom really come of very old families. Upon this supposed difference she prided herself.
Because she was, in fact, mistaken and because the O’Connells shared with the Beekmans and the Ginsbergs a tradition reaching back to a period when revenge was justice, and custom of kinsfolk the only law, Shane O’Connell had sought out Red McGurk and had sent him unshriven to his God. The only reason why this everyday Bowery occurrence excited any particular attention was not that Shane was an O’Connell but that McGurk was the son of a political boss of much influence and himself one of the leaders of a notorious cohort of young ruffians who when necessary could be relied upon to stuff a ballot box or otherwise to influence public opinion. As Red was a mighty man in Gideon, so his taking off was an event of moment, and he was waked with an elegance unsurpassed in the annals of Cherry Hill.
“An’ if ye don’t put the son-of-a—– who kilt me b’y in th’ chair, ye name’s mud–see?” the elder McGurk had informed District Attorney Peckham the next morning. “I’ve told the cops who done it. Now you do the rest–understand?”
Peckham understood very well. No one seeing the expression on McGurk’s purple countenance could have failed to do so.
“We’ll get him! Don’t you worry!” Peckham had assured the desolated father with a manner subtly suggesting both the profoundest sympathy and the prophetic glories of a juridical revenge in which the name of McGurk would be upon every lip and the picture of the deceased, his family, and the home in which they dwelt would be featured on the front page of every journal. “We’ll get him, all right!”
“See to it that ye do!” commented his visitor meaningly.
Therefore, though no one had seen him commit the crime, word was passed along the line to pick up Shane O’Connell for the murder of Red McGurk. It mattered not there was no evidence except the report of a muttered threat or two and the lie passed openly the week before.
Everybody knew that Shane had done it, and why; though no one could tell how he knew it. And because everybody knew, it became a political necessity for Peckham to put him under arrest with a great fanfare of trumpets and a grandiose announcement of the celerity with which the current would be turned through his body.
The only fly in the ointment was the fact that O’Connell had walked into the district attorney’s office as soon as the rumor reached him and quietly submitted to being arrested, saying merely: “I heard you wanted me. Well, here I am!”
But though they badgered him for hours, lured him by every pretext to confess, put a stool pigeon in the same cell with him, and resorted to every trick, device and expedient known to the prosecutor’s office to trap him into some sort of an admission, they got nothing for their pains. It was just one of those cases where the evidence simply wasn’t forthcoming. And yet Peckham was aware that unless he convicted O’Connell his name would indeed be mud–or worse. This story, however, is concerned less with the family honor of the O’Connells than with that of the Beekmans.
Miss Althea was the last surviving member of her branch of the family. Though she would probably have regarded it as slightly vulgar to have been referred to as “one hundred per cent American” she was so nearly so–except for a reminiscent affection for “the late dear Queen”–that the phrase in her case would have been substantially correct. Her mother had been the daughter of a distinguished Revolutionary statesman who had been a signer of the Declaration of Independence, an ambassador and justice of the Supreme Court as well; her father a celebrated newspaper editor.
She had been born in the Prue and I period in Gramercy Park near what is now The Players’ Club, and the old colonial house with its white trimmings and ornamental ironwork had been the scene of many a modest gayety at a time when Emerson, Lowell, and George William Curtis were viewed less as citizens than as high priests of Culture, sharing equally in sanctity with the goddess thereof. She could just remember those benign old gentlemen, as well as the many veterans of the Civil War who dined at her father’s decorous mahogany and talked of the preservation of the Constitution and those other institutions to found which it is generally assumed the first settlers landed on the Atlantic seaboard and self-sacrificingly accepted real estate from the wily native in return for whisky and glass beads. She was forty-seven years of age, a Colonial Dame, a Daughter of the American Revolution, a member of the board of directors of several charitable institutions, and she was worth a couple of million dollars in railroad securities. On Sundays she always attended the church in Stuyvesant Square frequented by her family, and as late as 1907 did so in the famous Beekman C-spring victoria driven by an aged negro coachman.
But besides being full of rectitude and good works–which of themselves so often fail of attraction–Miss Althea was possessed of a face so charming even in its slightly faded prettiness that one wondered how it was possible that she could successfully have withstood the suitors who must have crowded about her. Her house on Fifth Avenue was full of old engravings of American patriots, and the library inherited from her editorial parent was replete with volumes upon subjects which would have filled a Bolshevik with disgust. Briefly, if ever Trotzky had become Commissar of the Soviet of Manhattan, Miss Althea and those like her would have been the first candidates for a drumhead court-martial.
She prided herself equally upon her adherence to religious principle and the Acts of Congress. For the law, merely as law, she had the profoundest veneration, viewing the heterogeneous statutes passed from time to time by desultory legislators much as if they had in some mysterious way been handed down from Mount Sinai along with the Ten Commandments.
For any violator of the law she had the uttermost abhorrence, and the only weakness in her ethics arose out of her failure to discriminate between relative importances, for she undoubtedly regarded the sale of a glass of beer after the closing hour as being quite as reprehensible as grand larceny or the bearing of false witness. To her every judge must be a learned, wise and honorable man because he stood for the enforcement of the law of the land, and she never questioned whether or not that law was wise or otherwise, which latter often–it must be confessed–it was not.
In a word, though there was nothing progressive about Miss Althea she was one of those delightful, cultivated, loyal and enthusiastic female citizens who are rightfully regarded as vertebrae in the backbone of a country which, after it has got its back up, can undoubtedly lick any other nation on earth. It was characteristic of her that carefully folded inside the will drawn for her by her family solicitor was a slip of paper addressed to her heirs and next of kin requesting that at her funeral the national anthem should be played and that her coffin should be draped with the American flag.
But there was a somewhat curious if not uncommon inconsistency in Miss Beekman’s attitude toward lawbreakers in that once they were in prison they instantly became objects of her gentlest solicitude. Thus she was a frequent visitor at the Tombs, where she brought spiritual, and more often, it must be frankly admitted, bodily comfort to those of the inmates who were recommended by the district attorney and prison authorities as worthy of her attention; and Prosecutor Peckham being not unmindful of the possible political advantage that might accrue from being on friendly terms with so well-known a member of the distinguished family of Beekman, lost no opportunity to ingratiate himself with her and gave orders, to his subordinates to make her path as easy as possible. Thus quite naturally she had heard of Tutt & Tutt, and had a casual acquaintance with the senior partner himself.
“That O’Connell is a regular clam–won’t tell me anything at all!” remarked Mr. Tutt severely, hanging up his hat on the office tree with one hand while he felt for a match in his waistcoat pocket with the other, upon the afternoon of the day that Miss Beekman had had the conversation with Dawkins with which this story opens.
“National temperament,” answered Bonnie Doon, producing the desired match. “It’s just like an Irishman to refuse point-blank to talk to the lawyer who has been assigned to defend him. He’s probably afraid he’ll make some admission from which you will infer he’s guilty. No Irishman ever yet admitted that he was guilty of anything!”
“Well, I’ve never met a defendant of any other nationality who would, either,” replied Mr. Tutt, pulling vigorously at his stogy. “Even so, this chap O’Connell is a puzzle to me. ‘Go ahead and defend me,’ said he today, ‘but don’t ask me to talk about the case, because I won’t.’ I give it up. He wouldn’t even tell me where he was on the day of the murder.”
Bonnie grunted dubiously.
“There may be a very good reason for that!” he retorted. “If what rumor says is true he simply hunted for McGurk until he found him and put a lead pellet back of his ear.”
“And also, if what rumor says is true,” supplemented Tutt, who entered at this moment, “a good job it was, too. McGurk was a treacherous, dirty blackguard, the leader of a gang of criminals, even if he was, as they all agree, a handsome rascal who had every woman in the district on tenterhooks. Any girl in this case?”
Bonnie shrugged his shoulders.
“They claim so; only there’s nothing definite. The O’Connells are well spoken of.”
“If there was, that would explain why he wouldn’t talk,” commented Mr. Tutt. “That’s the devil of it. You can’t put in a defense under the unwritten law without besmirching the very reputation you are trying to protect.”
The senior partner of Tutt & Tutt wheeled his swivel chair to the window and crossing his congress boots upon the sill gazed contemplatively down upon the shipping.
“Unwritten law!” sarcastically exclaimed Tutt from the doorway. “There ain’t no such animal in these parts!”
“You’re quite wrong!” retorted his elder partner. “Most of our law–ninety-nine per cent of it, in fact–is unwritten.”
“Excuse me!” interjected Bonnie Doon, abandoning his usual flippancy. “What is that you said, Mr. Tutt?”
“That ninety-nine per cent of the laws by which we are governed are unwritten laws, just as binding as the printed ones upon our statute books, which after all are only the crystallization of the sentiments and opinions of the community based upon its traditions, manners, customs and religious beliefs. For every statute in print there are a hundred that have no tangible existence, based on our sense of decency, of duty and of honor, which are equally controlling and which it has never been found necessary to reduce to writing, since their infraction usually brings its own penalty or infringes the more delicate domain of private conscience where the crude processes of the criminal law cannot follow. The laws of etiquette and fair play are just as obligatory as legislative enactments–the Ten Commandments as efficacious as the Penal Code.”
“Don’t you agree with that, Tutt?” demanded Bonnie. “Every man’s conscience is his own private unwritten law.”
Tutt looked skeptical.
“Did you say every man had a conscience?” he inquired.
“And it makes a lot of trouble sometimes,” continued Mr. Tutt, ignoring him. “You remember when old Cogswell was on the bench and a man was brought before him for breaking his umbrella over the head of a fellow who had insulted the defendant’s wife, he said to the jury: ‘Gentlemen, if this plaintiff had called my wife a name like that I’d have smashed my umbrella over his head pretty quick. However, that’s not the law! Take the case, gentlemen!'”
“Well, I guess I was wrong,” admitted Tutt. “Of course, that is unwritten law. People don’t like to punish a man for resenting a slur upon his wife’s reputation.”
“But you see where that leads you?” remarked his partner. “The so-called unwritten law is based on our inherited idea of chivalry. A lady’s honor and reputation were sacred, and her knight was prepared instantly to defend it with the last drop of his blood. A reflection on her honesty was almost as unbearable as one upon her virtue. Logically, the unwritten law ought to permit women to break their contracts and do practically anything they see fit.”
“They do, don’t they–the dear things!” sighed Bonnie.
“I remember,” interjected Tutt brightly, “when it was the unwritten law of Cook County, Illinois–that’s Chicago, you know–that any woman could kill her husband for the life-insurance money. Seriously!”
“There’s no point of chivalry that I can see involved in that–it’s merely good business,” remarked Mr. Doon, lighting another cigarette. “All the same it’s obvious that the unwritten law might be stretched a long way. It’s a great convenience, though, on occasion!”
“We should be in an awful stew if nowadays we substituted ideas of chivalry for those of justice,” declared Mr. Tutt. “Fortunately the danger is past. As someone has said, ‘The women, once our superiors, have become our equals!'”
“We don’t even give ’em our seats in the Subway,” commented Tutt complacently. “No, we needn’t worry about the return of chivalry–in New York at any rate.”
“I should say not!” exclaimed Miss Wiggin, entering at that moment with a pile of papers, as nobody rose.
“But,” insisted Bonnie, “all the same there are certainly plenty of cases where if he had to choose between them any man would obey his conscience rather than the law.”
“Of course, there are such cases,” admitted Mr. Tutt. “But we ought to discourage the idea as much as possible.”
“Discourage a sense of honor?” exclaimed Miss Wiggin. “Why, Mr. Tutt!”
“It depends on what you mean by honor,” he retorted. “I don’t take much stock in the kind of honor that makes an heir apparent ‘perjure himself like a gentleman’ about a card game at a country house.”
“Neither do I,” she returned, “any more than I do in the kind of honor that compels a man to pay a gambling debt before he pays his tailor, but I do believe that there may be situations where, though it would not be permissible to perjure oneself, honor would require one to refuse to obey the law.”
“That’s a pretty dangerous doctrine,” reflected Mr. Tutt. “For everybody would be free to make himself the judge of when he ought to respect the law and when he oughtn’t. We can easily imagine that the law would come out at the small end of the horn.”
“In matters of conscience–which, I take it, is the same thing as one’s sense of honor–one has got to be one’s own judge,” declared Miss Wiggin firmly.
“The simplest way,” announced Tutt, “is to take the position that the law should always be obeyed and that the most honorable man is he who respects it the most.”
“Yes, the safest and also the most cowardly!” retorted Miss Wiggin. “Supposing the law required you to do something which you personally regarded not only as morally wrong but detestable, would you do it?”
“It wouldn’t!” protested Tutt with a grimace. “The law is the perfection of reason.”
“But I am entitled, am I not, to suppose, for purposes of argument, that it might?” she inquired caustically. “And I say that our sense of honor is the most precious thing we’ve got. It’s our duty to respect our institutions and obey the law whether we like it or not, unless it conflicts with our conscience, in which case we ought to defy it and take the consequences!”
“Dear me!” mocked Tutt. “And be burned at the stake?”
“If necessary; yes!”
“I don’t rightly get all this!” remarked Bonnie. “Me for the lee side of the law, every time!”
“It’s highly theoretical,” commented Tutt. “As usual with our discussions.”
“Not so theoretical as you might think!” interrupted his senior, hastening to reenforce Miss Wiggin. “Nobody can deny that to be true to oneself is the highest principle of human conduct, and that ”tis man’s perdition to be safe when for the truth he ought to die.’ That’s why we reverence the early Christian martyrs. But when it comes to choosing between what we loosely call honor and what the law requires–“
“But I thought the law embodied our ideas of honor!” replied Tutt. “Didn’t you say so–a few hours earlier in this conversation? As our highest duty is to the state, it is a mere play on words, in my humble opinion, to speak of honor as distinguished from law or the obligation of one’s oath in a court of justice. I bet I can find plenty of authorities to that effect in the library!”
“Of course you can,” countered Miss Wiggin. “You can find an authority on any side of any proposition you want to look for. That’s why one’s own sense of honor is so much more reliable than the law. What is the law, anyhow? It’s what some judge says is the law–until he’s reversed. Do you suppose I’d surrender my own private ideas of honor to a casual ruling from a judge who very likely hadn’t the remotest idea of what I think is honorable?”
“You’ll be jailed for contempt before you get through!” Tutt warned her.
“The fact of the matter is,” concluded Mr. Tutt, “that honor and law haven’t anything to do with one another. The courts have constantly pointed that out from the earliest days, though judges like, when they can, to make the two seem one and the same. Chief Baron Bowes, I remember, said in some case in 1743, ‘The court can’t determine what is honor.’ No, no; the two are different, and that difference will always make trouble. Isn’t it nearly tea time?”
* * * * *
Miss Beekman was just stepping off the elevator on the first floor of the Tombs the next afternoon on one of her weekly visits when she came face to face with Mr. Tutt.
She greeted him cordially, for she had taken rather a fancy to the shabby old man, drawn to him, in spite of her natural aversion to all members of the criminal bar, by the gentle refinement of his weather-beaten face. “I hope you have had a successful day.”
The lawyer shook his head in a pseudo-melancholy manner.
“Unfortunately, I have not,” he answered whimsically. “My only client refuses to speak to me! Perhaps you could get something out of him for me.”
“Oh, they all talk to me readily enough!” she replied. “I fancy they know I’m harmless. What is his name?”
“What is his offense?”
“He is charged with murder.”
Miss Althea recoiled. Her charitable impulses did not extend to defendants charged with homicide. There was too much notoriety connected with them, for one thing; there was nothing she hated so much as notoriety.
“Seriously,” he went on with earnestness, “I wish you’d have a word with him. It’s pretty hard to have to defend a man and not to know a thing about his side of the case. It’s almost your duty, don’t you think?”
Miss Althea hesitated, and was lost.
“Very well,” she answered reluctantly, “I’ll see what I can do. Perhaps he needs some medicine or letter paper or something. I’ll get an order from the warden and go right back and see him.”
Twenty minutes later Shane O’Connell faced Miss Beekman sullenly across the deal table of the counsel room. A ray of late sunshine fell through the high grating of the heavily barred window upon a face quite different from those which Miss Althea was accustomed to encounter in these surroundings, for it showed no touch of depravity or evil habits, and confinement had not yet deprived its cheeks of their rugged mantle of crimson or its eyes of their bold gleam.
He was little more than a boy, this murderer, as handsome a lad as ever swaggered out of County Kerry.
“An’ what may it be that leads you to send for such as me, Miss Beekman!” he demanded, glowering at her.
She felt suddenly unnerved, startled and rather shocked at his use of her name. Where could he have discovered it? From the keeper, probably, she decided. All her usual composure, her quiet self-possession, her aloof and slightly condescending sweetness–had deserted her.
“I thought,” she stammered–“I might–possibly–be of help to you.”
“‘Tis too late to make up for the harm ye’ve done!” His coal-black eyes reached into her shrinking body as if to tear out her heart.
“I!” she gasped. “I–do harm! What do you mean?”
“Did not my sister Katie work for yez?” he asked, and his words leaped and curled about her like hissing flames. “Did you see after her or watch her comings and goings, as she saw after you–she a mere lass of sixteen? Arrah! No!”
With a sensation of horror Miss Althea realized that at last she was in a murder case in spite of herself! This lad, the brother of Katie, the waitress whom she had discharged! How curious! And how unfortunate! His charge was preposterous; nevertheless a faint blush stole to her cheek and she looked away.
“How ridiculous!” she managed to say. “It was no part of my obligation to look after her! How could I?”
His hawk’s eyes watched her every tremor.
“Did ye not lock her out the night of the ball when she went wid McGurk?”
Suddenly she faltered. An indistinct accusing recollection turned her faint–of the housekeeper having told her that one of the girls insisted on going to a dance on an evening not hers by arrangement, and how she had given orders that the house should be closed the same as usual at ten o’clock for the night. If the girl couldn’t abide by the rules of the Beekman menage she could sleep somewhere else. What of it? Supposing she had done so? She could not be held responsible for remote, unreasonable and discreditable consequences!
And then by chance Shane O’Connell made use of a phrase that indirectly saved his life, a phrase curiously like the one used on a former occasion by Dawkins to Miss Althea:
“Katie was a member of your household; ye might have had a bit of thought for her!” he asserted bitterly.
Dawkins had said: “You’d think a girl would have some consideration for her employer, if nothing else. In a sense she is a guest in the house and should behave herself as such.”
There was no sense in it! There was no parallel, no analogy. There was no obligation to treat the girl as a guest, even though the girl should have acted like one. Miss Beekman knew it. And yet there was–something! Didn’t she owe some sort of duty at any rate toward those in her employment–those who slept under her roof?
“‘Twould have been better to have been kind to her then than to be kind to me now!” said he with sad conviction.
The proud Miss Althea Beekman, the dignified descendant of a long line of ancestors, turned red. Heretofore serenely confident of her own personal virtue and her own artificial standards of democracy, she now found herself humiliated and chagrined before this rough young criminal.
“You–are–quite right!” she confessed, her eyes smarting with sudden tears. “My position is quite–quite illogical. But of course I had no idea! Please, please let me try to help you–if I can–and Katie, too–if it isn’t too late.”
Shane O’Connell experienced contrition. After all it was not seemly that the likes of him should be dictating to the likes of her. And he could never abide seeing a woman–particularly a pretty woman–cry.
“Forgive me, madam!” he begged, lowering his head.
“You were quite justified in all you said!” she assured him. “Please tell me everything that has happened. I have influence with the district attorney and–in other places. No doubt I can be of assistance to you. Of course, you can absolutely trust me!”
Shane O’Connell, looking into her honest gray eyes, knew that he could trust her. Slowly–brokenly–tensely, he told her how he had killed Red McGurk, and why.
The corridors were full of shadows when Althea Beekman put her hands on Shane O’Connell’s shoulders and bade him good night. Though she abominated his crime and loathed him for having committed it she felt in some way partially responsible, and she also perceived that, by the code of the O’Connells, Shane had done what he believed to be right. He had taken the law into his own hands and he was ready to pay the necessary penalty. He would have done the same thing all over again. To this extent at least he had her respect.
She found Mr. Tutt waiting for her on the bench by the warden’s office.
“Well?” he asked with a smile, rising to greet her and tossing away his stogy.
“I haven’t very good news for you,” she answered regretfully. “He’s confessed to me–told me everything–why he shot him and where he bought the pistol. He’s a brave boy, though! It’s a sad case! But what can you do with people who believe themselves justified in doing things like that?”
She did not notice Detective Eddie Conroy, of the D.A.’s office, standing behind an adjacent pillar, ostentatiously lighting a cigar; nor see him smile as he slowly walked away.
* * * * *
“Talk about luck!” exulted O’Brien, the yellow dog of the district attorney’s office, an hour later to his chief. “What do you think, boss? Eddie Conroy heard Miss Beekman telling old man Tutt over in the Tombs that O’Connell had confessed to her! Say, how’s that? Some evidence–what?”
“What good will that do us?” asked Peckham, glancing up with a scowl from his desk. “She won’t testify for us.”
“But she’ll have to testify if we call her, won’t she?” demanded his assistant.
The district attorney drummed on the polished surface before him.
“We–ell, I suppose so,” he admitted hesitatingly. “But you can’t just subpoena a woman like that without any warning and put her on the stand and make her testify. It would be too rough!”
“It’s the only way to do it!” retorted O’Brien with a sly grin. “If she knew in advance that we were thinking of calling her she’d beat it out of town.”
“That’s true,” agreed his chief. “That’s as far as she’d go, too, in defying the law. But I don’t much like it. Those Beekmans have a lot of influence, and if she got sore she could make us a heap of trouble! Besides it’s sort of a scaly trick making her give up on him like that.”
O’Brien raised his brows.
“Scaly trick! He’s a murderer, isn’t he? And he’ll get off if we don’t call her. It’s a matter of duty, as I see it.”
“All the same, my son, your suggestion has a rotten smell to it. We may have to do it–I don’t say we won’t–but it’s risky business!” replied Peckham dubiously.
“It’s a good deal less risky than not doing it, so far as your candidacy next autumn is concerned!” retorted his assistant. “We won’t let her suspect what we’re goin’ to do; and the last minute I’ll call her to the stand and cinch the case! She won’t even know who called her! Perhaps I can arrange with Judge Babson to call her on some other point and then pretend to sort of stumble onto the fact of the confession and examine her himself. That would let us out. I can smear it over somehow.”
“You’d better,” commented Peckham, “unless you want a howl from the papers! It would make quite a story if Miss Althea Beekman got on the rampage. She could have your scalp, my boy, if she wanted it!”
“And McGurk could have yours!” retorted O’Brien with the impudence born of knowledge.
The prosecution of Shane O’Connell, which otherwise might have slowly languished and languishing died, took on new life owing to the evidence thus innocently delivered into the hands of the district attorney; in fact it became a _cause celebre_. The essential elements to convict were now all there–the _corpus delicti_, evidence of threats on the part of the defendant, of motive, of opportunity, and–his confession. The law which provides that the statement of an accused “is not sufficient to warrant his conviction without additional proof that the crime charged has been committed” would be abundantly satisfied–though without his confession there would have been no proof whatever that the crime charged had been committed by him.
Thus, without her knowing it, Miss Beekman was an essential witness and, in fact, the pivot upon which the entire case turned.
The day of the great sporting event came. With it arrived in full panoply the McGurks, their relatives and followers. All Cherry Hill seemed to have packed itself into Part I of the Supreme Court. There was an atmosphere somehow suggestive of the races or a prize fight. But it was a sporting event which savored of a sure thing–really more like a hanging. They were there to make holiday over the law’s revenge for the killing of the darling of the Pearl Button Kids. Peckham personally assured McGurk that everything was copper-fastened.
“He’s halfway up the river already!” he said jocularly.
And McGurk, swelling with importance and emotion, pulled a couple of cigars from his pocket and the two smoked the pipe of peace.
But the reader is not particularly concerned with the progress of the trial, for he has already attended many. It is enough to say that a jury with undershot jaws, who had proved by previous experience their indifference to capital punishment and to all human sympathy, were finally selected and that the witnesses were duly called, and testified to the usual facts, while the Pearl Button Kids and the rest, spitting surreptitiously beneath the benches, eagerly drank in every word. There was nothing for Mr. Tutt to do; nothing for him to deny. The case built itself up, brick by brick. And Shane O’Connell sat there unemotionally, hardly listening. There was nothing in the evidence to reflect in any way upon the honor of the O’Connells in general or in particular. He had done that which that honor demanded and he was ready to pay the penalty–if the law could get him. He assumed that it would get him. So did the Tutts.
But when toward the end of the third day nothing had yet been brought forward to connect him with the crime Tutt leaned over and whispered to Mr. Tutt, “D’ye know, I’m beginning to have a hunch there isn’t any case!”
Mr. Tutt made an imperceptible gesture of assent.
“Looks that way,” he answered out of the corner of his mouth. “Probably they’ll spring the connecting evidence at the end and give us the _coup de grace_.”
At that moment a police witness was released from the stand and O’Brien stepped to the bench and whispered something to the judge, who glanced at the clock and nodded. It was twenty minutes of four, and the jury were already getting restless, for the trial had developed into a humdrum, cut-and-dried affair.
Miss Beekman sitting far back in the rear of the court room suddenly heard O’Brien call her name, and a quiver of apprehension passed through her body. She had never testified in any legal proceeding, and the idea of getting up before such a crowd of people and answering questions filled her with dismay. It was so public! Still, if it was going to help O’Connell–
“Althea Beekman,” bellowed Cap. Phelan, “to the witness chair!”
Althea Beekman! The gentle lady felt as if she had been rudely stripped of all her protective clothing. Althea! Did not the law do her the courtesy of calling her even “Miss”? Nerving herself to the performance of her duty she falteringly made her way between the crowded benches, past the reporters’ table, and round back of the jury box. The judge, apparently a pleasant-faced, rather elderly man, bowed gravely to her, indicated where she should sit and administered the oath to her himself, subtly dwelling upon the phrase “the whole truth,” and raising his eyes heavenward as he solemnly pronounced the words “so help you God!”
“I do!” declared Miss Beekman primly but decidedly.
Behind her upon the court-room wall towered in its flowing draperies the majestic figure of the Goddess of the Law, blindfolded and holding aloft the scales of justice. Beside her sat in the silken robes of his sacred office a judge who cleverly administered that law to advance his own interests and those of his political associates. In front of her, treacherously smiling, stood the cynical, bullet-headed O’Brien. At a great distance Mr. Tutt leaned on his elbows at a table beside Shane O’Connell. To them she directed her gaze and faintly smiled.
“Miss Beekman,” began O’Brien as courteously as he knew how, “you reside, do you not, at Number 1000 Fifth Avenue, in this city and county?”
“I do,” she answered with resolution.
“Your family have always lived in New York, have they not?”
“Since 1630,” she replied deprecatingly and with more confidence.
“You are prominent in various philanthropic, religious and civic activities?”
“Not prominent; interested,” she corrected him.
“And you make a practise of visiting prisoners in the Tombs?”
She hesitated. What could this be leading to?
“Occasionally,” she admitted.
“Do you know this defendant, Shane O’Connell?”
“Did you see him on the twenty-third day of last month?”
“I think so–if that was the day.”
“What day do you refer to?”
“The day I had the talk with him.”
“Oh, you had a talk with him?”
“Where did you have that talk with him?”
“In the counsel room of the Tombs.”
O’Brien paused. Even his miserable soul revolted at what he was about to do.
“What did he say?” he asked, nervously looking away.
Something in his hangdog look warned Miss Beekman that she was being betrayed, but before she could answer Mr. Tutt was on his feet.
“One moment!” he cried. “May I ask a preliminary question?”
The court signified acquiescence.
“Was that conversation which you had with the defendant a confidential one?”
“I object to the question!” snapped O’Brien. “The law recognizes no confidential communications as privileged except those made to a priest, a physician or an attorney. The witness is none of these. The question is immaterial and irrelevant.”
“That is the law,” announced the judge, “but under all the circumstances I will permit the witness to answer.”
Miss Beekman paused.
“Why,” she began, “of course it was confidential, Mr. Tutt. O’Connell wouldn’t have told me anything if he had supposed for one moment I was going to repeat what he said. Besides, I suggested that I might be able to help him. Yes, certainly our talk was confidential.”
“I am sorry,” gloated O’Brien, “but I shall have to ask you what it was.”
“That is not a question,” said Mr. Tutt calmly.
“What did the defendant say to you in the counsel room of the Tombs on the twenty-third of last month?” cautiously revised O’Brien.
“I object!” thundered Mr. Tutt, his form towering until seemingly it matched that of the blind goddess in height. “I object to the answer as requiring a breach of confidence which the law could not tolerate.”
Judge Babson turned politely to Miss Beekman.
“I regret very much that I shall be obliged to ask you to state what the defendant said to you. You will recall that you yourself volunteered the information that you had had the talk in question. Otherwise”–he coughed and put up his hand–“we might possibly never have learned of it. A defendant cannot deprive the people of the right to prove what he may have divulged respecting his offense merely by claiming that it was in confidence. Public policy could never allow that. It may be unpleasant for you to answer the question but I must ask you to do so.”
“But,” she protested, “you certainly cannot expect me to betray a confidence! I asked O’Connell to tell me what he had done so that I could help him–and he trusted me!”
“But you are not responsible for the law! He took his chance!” admonished the judge.
Slowly Miss Althea’s indignation rose as she perceived the dastardly trick which O’Brien had played upon her. Already she suspected that the judge was only masquerading in the clothing of a gentleman. With a white face she turned to Mr. Tutt.
“Does the law require me to answer, Mr. Tutt?” she inquired.
“Do not ask questions–answer them,” ordered Babson brusquely, feeling the change in her manner. “You are a witness for the people–not the defendant.”
“I am not a witness against O’Connell!” she declared. “This man”–indicating O’Brien scornfully–“has in some way found out that I–Oh, surely the law doesn’t demand anything so base as that!”
There was silence. The wheels of justice hung on a dead center.
“Answer the question,” remarked His Honor tartly.
All Miss Beekman’s long line of ancestors turned in their graves. In her Beekman blood the chief justice, the ambassador, the great editor, the signer of the Declaration of Independence, stirred, awoke, rubbed their eyes and sternly reared themselves. And that blood–blue though it was instead of scarlet like the O’Connells’–boiled in her veins and burned through the delicate tissue of her cheeks.
“My conscience will not permit me to betray a confidence!” she cried angrily.
“I direct you to answer!” ordered the judge.
“I object to the court’s threatening the witness!” interjected Mr. Tutt. “I wish it to appear upon the record that the manner of the court is most unjudicial and damaging to the defendant.”
“Take your seat, sir!” barked Babson, his features swelling with anger. “Your language is contemptuous!”
The jury were leaning forward intently. Trained militiamen of the gibbet, they nevertheless admired this little woman’s fearlessness and the old lawyer’s pugnacity. On the rear wall the yellow face of the old self-regulating clock, that had gayly ticked so many men into the electric chair, leered shamelessly across at the blind goddess.
“Answer the question, madam! If, as you claim, you are a patriotic citizen of this commonwealth, having due respect for its institutions and for the statutes, you will not set up your own ideas of what the law ought to be in defiance of the law as it stands. I order you to answer! If you do not I shall be obliged to take steps to compel you to do so.”
In the dead silence that followed, the stones in the edifice of Miss Beekman’s inherited complacency, with each beat of the clock, fell one by one to the ground until it was entirely demolished. Vainly she struggled to test her conscience by her loyalty to her country’s laws. But the task was beyond her.
Tightly compressing her lips she sat silent in the chair, while the delighted reporters scribbled furious messages to their city editors that Miss Althea Beekman, one of the Four Hundred, was defying Judge Babson, and to rush up a camera man right off in a taxi, and to look her up in the morgue for a front-page story. O’Brien glanced uneasily at Babson. Possible defiance on the part of this usually unassuming lady had not entered into his calculations. The judge took a new tack.
“You probably do not fully understand the situation in which you are placed,” he explained. “You are not responsible for the law. Neither are you responsible in any way for the consequences to this defendant, whatever they may be. The matter is entirely out of your hands. You are compelled to do as the court orders. As a law-abiding citizen you have no choice in the matter.”
Miss Althea’s modest intellect reeled, but she stood her ground, the ghost of the Signer at her elbow.
“I am sorry,” she replied, “but my own self-respect will not allow me to answer.”
“In that case,” declared Babson, playing his trump card, “it will be my unpleasant duty to commit you for contempt.”
There was a bustle of excitement about the reporters’ table. Here was a story!
“Very well,” answered Miss Beekman proudly. “Do as you see fit, and as your own duty and conscience demand.”
The judge could not conceal his annoyance. The last thing in the world that he wished to do was to send Miss Althea to jail. But having threatened her he must carry out his threat or forever lose face.
“I will give the witness until tomorrow morning at half after ten o’clock to make up her mind what she will do,” he announced after a hurried conference with O’Brien. “Adjourn court!”
Miss Beekman did not go to bed at all that night. Until a late hour she conferred in the secrecy of her Fifth Avenue library with her gray-haired solicitor, who, in some mysterious way, merely over the telephone, managed to induce the newspapers to omit any reference to his client’s contemptuous conduct in their morning editions.
“There’s no way out of it, my dear,” he said finally as he took his leave–he was her father’s cousin and very fond of her–“this judge has the power to send you to jail if he wants to–and dares to! It’s an even chance whether he will dare to or not. It depends on whether he prefers to stand well with the McGurks or with the general public. Of course I respect your attitude, but really I think you are a little quixotic. Points of honor are too ephemeral to be debated in courts of justice. To do so would be to open the door to all kinds of abuses. Dishonest witnesses would constantly avail themselves of the opportunity to avoid giving evidence.”
“Dishonest witnesses would probably lie in the first place!” she quavered.
“True! I quite overlooked that!” he smiled, gazing down at her in an avuncular manner. “But to-day the question isn’t open. It is settled, whether we like it or not. No pledge of privacy, no oath of secrecy–can avail against demand in a court of justice. Even confessions obtained by fraud are admissible–though we might wish otherwise.”
Miss Beekman shrugged her shoulders.
“Nothing you have said seems to me to alter the situation.”
“Very well,” he replied. “I guess that settles it. Knowing you and the Beekman breed! There’s one thing I must say,” he added as he stood in the doorway after bidding her good night–“that old fellow Tutt has behaved pretty well, leaving you entirely alone this way. I always had an idea he was a sort of shyster. Most attorneys of that class would have been sitting on your doorstep all the evening trying to persuade you to stick to your resolution not to give their client away, and to do the square thing. But he’s done nothing of the sort. Rather decent on the whole!”
“Perhaps he recognizes a woman of honor when he sees one!” she retorted.
“Honor!” he muttered as he closed the door. “What crimes are sometimes committed in thy name!”
But on the steps he stopped and looked back affectionately at the library window.
“After all, Althea’s a good sport!” he remarked to himself.
* * * * *
At or about the same moment a quite dissimilar conference was being held between Judge Babson and Assistant District Attorney O’Brien in the cafe of the Passamaquoddy Club.
“She’ll cave!” declared O’Brien, draining his glass. “Holy Mike! No woman like her is going to stay in jail! Besides, if you don’t commit her everybody will say that you were scared to–yielded to influence. You’re in the right and it will be a big card for you to show that you aren’t afraid of anybody!”
Babson pulled nervously on his cigar.
“Maybe that’s so,” he said, “but I don’t much fancy an appellate court sustaining me on the law and at the same time roasting hell out of me as a man!”
“Oh, they won’t do that!” protested O’Brien. “How could they? All they’re interested in is the law!”
“I’ve known those fellows to do queer things sometimes,” answered the learned judge. “And the Beekmans are pretty powerful people.”
“Well, so are the McGurks!” warned O’Brien.
* * * * *
“Now, Miss Beekman,” said Judge Babson most genially the next morning, after that lady had taken her seat in the witness chair and the jury had answered to their names, “I hope you feel differently to-day about giving your testimony. Don’t you think that after all it would be more fitting if you answered the question?”
Miss Althea firmly compressed her lips.
“At least let me read you some of the law on the subject,” continued His Honor patiently. “Originally many people, like yourself, had the mistaken idea that what they called their honor should be allowed to intervene between them and their duty. And even the courts sometimes so held. But that was long ago–in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. To-day the law wisely recognizes no such thing. Let me read you what Baron Hotham said, in Hill’s Trial in 1777, respecting the testimony of a witness who very properly told the court what the accused had said to him. It is very clearly put:
“‘The defendant certainly thought him his friend, and he’–the defendant–‘therefore did disclose all this to him. Gentlemen, one has only to say further that if this point of honor was to be so sacred as that a man who comes by knowledge of this sort from an offender was not to be at liberty to disclose it the most atrocious criminals would every day escape punishment; and therefore it is that the wisdom of the law knows nothing of that point of honor.'”
Miss Beekman listened politely.
“I am sorry,” she replied with dignity. “I shall not change my mind. I refuse to answer the question, and–and you can do whatever you like with me.”
“Do you understand that you are in contempt of this court? Do you intend to show contempt for this court?” he demanded wrathfully.
“I do,” answered Miss Althea. “I have contempt for this court.”
A titter danced along the benches and some fool in the back of the room clapped his hands.
Judge Babson’s face grew hard and his eyes narrowed to steel points.
“The witness stands committed for contempt,” he announced bitingly. “I direct that she be confined in the city prison for thirty days and pay a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars. Madam, you will go with the officer.”
Miss Althea rose while the ghost of the Signer encircled her with his arm.
Mr. Tutt was already upon his feet. He knew that the ghost of the Signer was there.
“May I ask the court if the witness, having been committed for the contemptuous conduct of which she is obviously guilty, may remain in your chambers until adjournment, in order that she may arrange her private affairs?”
“I will grant her that privilege,” agreed Judge Babson with internal relief. “The request is quite reasonable. Captain Phelan, you may take the witness into my robing room and keep her there for the present.”
With her small head erect, her narrow shoulders thrown back, and with a resolute step as befitted the descendant of a long line of ancestors Miss Althea passed behind the jury box and disappeared.
The twelve looked at one another dubiously. Both Babson and O’Brien seemed nervous and undecided.
“Well, call your next witness,” remarked the judge finally.
“But I haven’t any more witnesses!” growled O’Brien. “And you know it almighty well, you idiot!” he muttered under his breath.
“If that is the people’s case I move for the defendant’s immediate discharge,” cried Mr. Tutt, jumping to his feet. “There is no evidence connecting him with the crime.”
McGurk, furious, sprang toward the bar.
“See here! Wait a minute! Hold on, judge! I can get a hundred witnesses–“
“Sit down!” shouted one of the officers, thrusting him back. “Keep quiet!”
Babson looked at O’Brien and elevated his forehead. Then as O’Brien gave a shrug the judge turned to the expectant jury and said in apologetic tones:
“Gentlemen of the jury, where the people have failed to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt it is the duty of the court to direct a verdict. In this case, though by inference the testimony points strongly toward the prisoner, there is no direct proof against him and I am accordingly constrained–much as I regret it–to instruct you to return a verdict of not guilty.”
In the confusion which followed the rendition of the verdict a messenger entered breathlessly and forcing his way through the crowd delivered a folded paper to Mr. Tutt, who immediately rose and handed it to the clerk; and that official, having hurriedly perused it and pursed his lips in surprise, passed it over the top of the bench to the judge.
“What’s this?” demanded Babson. “Don’t bother me now with trifles!”
“But it’s a writ of habeas corpus, Your Honor, signed by Judge Winthrop, requiring the warden to produce Miss Beekman in Part I of the Supreme Court, and returnable forthwith,” whispered Mr. McGuire in an awe-stricken voice. “I can’t disregard that, you know!”
“What!” cried Babson. “How on earth could he have issued a writ in this space of time? The thing’s impossible!”
“If Your Honor please,” urbanely explained Mr. Tutt, “as–having known Miss Beekman’s father–I anticipated that the witness would pursue the course of conduct which, in fact, she has, I prepared the necessary papers early this morning and as soon as you ordered her into custody my partner, who was waiting in Judge Winthrop’s chambers, presented them to His Honor, secured his signature and brought the writ here in a taxicab.”
Nobody seemed to be any longer interested in O’Connell. The reporters had left their places and pushed their way into the inclosure before the dais. In the rear of the room O’Brien was vainly engaged in trying to placate the Pearl Button Kids, who were loudly swearing vengeance upon both him and Peckham. It was a scene as nearly turbulent as the old yellow clock had ever witnessed. Even the court officers abandoned any effort to maintain order and joined the excited group about Mr. Tutt before the bench.
“Does Your Honor desire that this matter be argued before the Supreme Court?” inquired Mr. Tutt suavely. “If so I will ask that the prisoner be paroled in my custody. Judge Winthrop is waiting.”
Babson had turned pale. Facing a dozen newspapermen, pencils in hand, he quailed. To hell with “face.” Why, if he went on any longer with the farce the papers would roast the life out of him. With an apology for a smile that was, in fact, a ghastly grin, he addressed himself to the waiting group of jurymen, lawyers and reporters.
“Of course, gentlemen,” he said, “I never had any real intention of dealing harshly with Miss Beekman. Undoubtedly she acted quite honestly and according to her best lights. She is a very estimable member of society. It will be unnecessary, Mr. Tutt, for you to argue the writ before Judge Winthrop. The relator, Althea Beekman, is discharged.”
“Thank you, Your Honor!” returned Mr. Tutt, bowing profoundly, and lowering an eyelid in the direction of the gentlemen of the press. “You are indeed a wise and upright judge!”
The wise and upright judge rose grandly and gathered his robes about the judicial legs.
“Good morning, gentlemen,” he remarked from his altitude to the reporters.
“Good morning, judge,” they replied in chorus. “May we say anything about the writ?”
Judge Babson paused momentarily in his flight.
“Oh! Perhaps you might as well let the whole thing go,” he answered carelessly. “On the whole I think it better that you should.”
As they fought their way out of the doorway Charley Still, of the _Sun_, grinned at “Deacon” Terry, of the _Tribune_, and jocosely inquired: “Say, Deac., did you ever think why one calls a judge ‘Your Honor’?”
The Deacon momentarily removed his elbow from the abdomen of the gentleman beside him and replied sincerely though breathlessly, “No! You can search me!”
And “Cap.” Phelan, who happened to be setting his watch at just that instant, affirms that he will make affidavit that the old yellow clock winked across the room at the Goddess of Justice, and that beneath her bandages she unmistakably smiled.
By Advice of Counsel
“Kotow! Kotow! To the great Yen-How, And wish him the longest of lives!
With his one-little, two-little, three-little, four-little, Five-little, six-little wives!”
“The fact is I’ve been arrested for bigamy,” said Mr. Higgleby in a pained and slightly resentful manner. He was an ample flabby person, built like an isosceles triangle with a smallish head for the apex, slightly expanded in the gangliar region just above the nape of the neck–medical students and phrenologists please note–and habitually wearing an expression of helpless pathos. Instinctively you felt that you wanted to do something for Mr. Higgleby–to mother him, maybe.
“Then you should see my partner, Mr. Tutt,” said Mr. Tutt severely. “He’s the matrimonial specialist.”
“I want to see Mr. Tutt, the celebrated divorce lawyer,” explained Mr. Higgleby.
“You mean my partner, Mr. Tutt,” said Mr. Tutt. “Willie, show the gentleman in to Mr. Tutt.”
“Thank you, sir,” said Mr. Higgleby, and followed Willie.
“Is this Mr. Higgleby?” chirped Tutt as Higgleby entered the adjoining office. “Delighted to see you, sir! What can we–I–do for you?”
“The fact is, I’ve been arrested for bigamy,” repeated Mr. Higgleby.
Now the Tutt system–demonstrated effective by years of experience–for putting a client in a properly grateful and hence liberal frame of mind was, like the method of some physicians, first to scare said client, or patient, out of his seven senses; second, to admit reluctantly, upon reflection, that in view of the fact that he had wisely come to Tutt & Tutt there might still be some hope for him; and third, to exculpate him with such a flourish of congratulation upon his escape that he was glad to pay the modest little fee of which he was then and there relieved. Tutt & Tutt had only two classes of clients: those who paid as they came in, and those who paid as they went out.
Therefore upon hearing Mr. Higgleby’s announcement as to the nature of his trouble Tutt registered horror.
“What? What did you say?” he demanded.
“I said,” repeated Mr. Higgleby with a shade of annoyance, “‘the fact is, I’ve been arrested for bigamy.’ I don’t see any reason for making such a touse about it,” he added plaintively.
“Who’s making a–a–a touse about it?” inquired Tutt, perceiving that he had taken the wrong tack. “I’m not. I was just a little surprised at a man of your genteel appearance–“
“Oh, rot!” expostulated Mr. Higgleby weakly. “You’re just like all of ’em! I suppose you were going to say I didn’t look like a bigamist–and all that. Well, cut it! Let’s start fair. I _am_ a bigamist!”
Tutt regarded him with obvious curiosity. “You don’t say!” he ejaculated, much as if he wished to add: “How does it feel?”
“I do say!” retorted Mr. Higgleby.
“Well,” exclaimed Tutt cheerily, passing into the second phase of the Tutt-Tutt treatment, “after all, bigamy isn’t so bad! It’s only five years at the worst. Generally it’s not more than six months.”
“Get wise!” snapped Mr. Higgleby. “I didn’t come here to have you throw cold chills into me. I came here to find out how to beat it!”
“Why, certainly! Of course!” protested Tutt hastily.
“And I expect you to get me off!”