This page contains affiliate links. As Amazon Associates we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • 02/1862
Buy it on Amazon FREE Audible 30 days

part of the publick, (as I have reason to know from several letters of inquiry already received,) but would also, as I think, have largely increased the circulation of your Magazine in this town. _Nihil humani alienum_, there is a curiosity about the affairs of our neighbours which is not only pardonable, but even commendable. But I shall abide a more fitting season.

As touching the following literary effort of Esquire Biglow, much might be profitably said on the topick of Idyllick and Pastoral Poetry, and concerning the proper distinctions to be made between them, from Theocritus, the inventor of the former, to Collins, the latest authour I know of who has emulated the classicks in the latter style. But in the time of a civil war worthy a Milton to defend and a Lucan to sing, it may be reasonably doubted whether the publick, never too studious of serious instruction, might not consider other objects more deserving of present attention. Concerning the title of Idyll, which Mr. Biglow has adopted at my suggestion, it may not be improper to animadvert, that the name properly signifies a poem somewhat rustick in phrase, (for, though the learned are not agreed as to the particular dialect employed by Theocritus, they are universanimous both as to its rusticity and its capacity of rising now and then to the level of more elevated sentiments and expressions,) while it is also descriptive of real scenery and manners. Yet it must be admitted that the production now in question (which here and there bears perhaps too plainly the marks of my correcting hand) does partake of the nature of a Pastoral, inasmuch as the interlocutors therein are purely imaginary beings, and the whole is little better than [Greek: skias onar.] The plot was, as I believe, suggested by the “Twa Briggs” of Robert Burns, a Scottish poet of the last century, as that found its prototype in the “Mutual Complaint of Plainstanes and Causey” by Fergusson, though the metre of this latter be different by a foot in each verse. I reminded my talented young parishioner and friend that Concord Bridge had long since yielded to the edacious tooth of Time. But he answered me to this effect: that there was no greater mistake of an authour than to suppose the reader had no fancy of his own; that, if once that faculty was to be called into activity, it were _better_ to be in for the whole sheep than the shoulder; and that he knew Concord like a book,–an expression questionable in propriety, since there are few things with which he is not more familiar than with the printed page. In proof of what he affirmed, he showed me some verses which with others he had stricken out as too much delaying the action, but which I communicate in this place because they rightly define “punkin-seed,” (which Mr. Bartlett would have a kind of perch,–a creature to which I have found a rod or pole not to be so easily equivalent in our inland waters as in the books of arithmetic,) and because it conveys an eulogium on the worthy son of an excellent father, with whose acquaintance (_eheu, fugaces anni!_) I was formerly honoured.

“But nowadays the Bridge ain’t wut they show, So much ez Em’son, Hawthorne, an’ Thoreau. I know the village, though: was sent there once A-schoolin’, coz to home I played the dunce; An’ I’ve ben sence a-visitin’ the Jedge, Whose garding whispers with the river’s edge, Where I’ve sot mornin’s, lazy as the bream, Whose only business is to head up-stream, (We call ’em punkin-seed,) or else in chat Along’th the Jedge, who covers with his hat More wit an’ gumption an’ shrewd Yankee sense Than there is mosses on an ole stone fence.”

Concerning the subject-matter of the verses I have not the leisure at present to write so fully as I could wish, my time being occupied with the preparation of a discourse for the forthcoming bi-centenary celebration of the first settlement of Jaalam East Parish. It may gratify the publick interest to mention the circumstance, that my investigations to this end have enabled me to verify the fact (of much historick importance, and hitherto hotly debated) that Shearjashub Tarbox was the first child of white parentage born in this town, being named in his father’s will under date August 7th, or 9th, 1662. It is well known that those who advocate the claims of Mehetable Goings are unable to find any trace of her existence prior to October of that year. As respects the settlement of the Mason and Slidell question, Mr. Biglow has not incorrectly stated the popular sentiment, so far as I can judge by its expression in this locality. For myself, I feel more sorrow than resentment; for I am old enough to have heard those talk of England who still, even after the unhappy estrangement, could not unschool their lips from calling her the Mother-Country. But England has insisted on ripping up old wounds, and has undone the healing work of fifty years; for nations do not reason, they only feel, and the _spretae injuria formae_ rankles in their minds as bitterly as in that of a woman. And because this is so, I feel the more satisfaction that our Government has acted (as all Governments should, standing as they do between the people and their passions) as if it had arrived at years of discretion. There are three short and simple words, the hardest of all to pronounce in any language, (and I suspect they were no easier before the confusion of tongues,) but which no man or nation that cannot utter can claim to have arrived at manhood. Those words are, _I was wrong_; and I am proud, that, while England played the boy, our rulers had strength enough from below and wisdom enough from above to quit themselves like men. Let us strengthen the hands of those in authority over us, and curb out own tongues,[A] remembering that General Wait commonly proves in the end more than a match for General Headlong, and that the Good Book ascribes safety to a multitude, indeed, but not to a mob, of counsellours. Let us remember and perpend the words of Paulus Emilius to the people of Rome: that, “if they judged they could manage the war to more advantage by any other, he would willingly yield up his charge; but if they confided in him, _they were not to make themselves his colleagues in his office, or raise reports, or criticize, his actions, but, without talking, supply him with means and assistance necessary to the carrying on of the war; for, if they proposed to command their own commander, they would render this expedition more ridiculous than the former.” (Vide Plutarchum in vita P.E.)_ Let us also not forget what the same excellent authour says concerning Perseus’s fear of spending money, and not permit the covetousness of Brother Jonathan to be the good-fortune of Jefferson Davis. For my own part, till I am ready to admit the Commander-in-Chief to my pulpit, I shall abstain from planning his battles. Patience is the armour of a nation; and in our desire for peace, let us never be willing to surrender the Constitution bequeathed us by fathers at least as wise as ourselves, (even with Jefferson Davis to help us,) and, with those degenerate Romans, _tuta et presentia quam vetera et periculosa malle._

With respect,
Your ob’t humble serv’t,

[Footnote A: And not only our own tongues, but the pens of others, which are swift to convey useful intelligence to the enemy. This is no new inconvenience; for, under date 3rd June, 1745, General Pepperell wrote thus to Governour Shirley from Louisbourg:–“What your Excellency observes of the _army’s being made acquainted with any plans proposed, until really to be put in execution_, has always been disagreeable to me, and I have given many cautions relating to it. But when your Excellency considers that _our Council of War consists of more than twenty members_, am persuaded you will think it _impossible for me to hinder it_, if any of them will persist in communicating to inferiour officers and soldiers what ought to be kept secret. I am informed that the Boston newspapers are filled with paragraphs from private letters relating to the expedition. Will your Excellency permit me to say I think it may be of ill consequence? Would it not be convenient, if your Excellency should forbid the Printers’ inserting such news?” Verily, if _tempora mutantur,_ we may question the _et nos mutamur in illis;_ and if tongues be leaky, it will need all hands at the pumps to save the Ship of State. Our history dates and repeats itself. If Sassycus (rather than Alcibiades) find a parallel in Beauregard, so Weakwash, as he is called by the brave Lieutenant Lion Gardiner, need not seek far among our own Sachems for his antitype.]

I love to start out arter night’s begun, An’ all the chores about the farm are done, The critters milked an’ foddered, gates shet fast, Tools cleaned aginst to-morrer, supper past, An’ Nancy darnin’ by her ker’sene lamp,– I love, I say, to start upon a tramp,
To shake the kinkles out o’ back an’ legs, An’ kind o’ rack my life off from the dregs Thet’s apt to settle in the buttery-hutch Of folks thet foller in one rut too much: Hard work is good an’ wholesome, past all doubt; But ‘t ain’t so, ef the mind gits tuckered out.

Now, bein’ born in Middlesex, you know, There’s certin spots where I like best to go: The Concord road, for instance, (I, for one, Most gin’lly ollers call it _John Bull’s Run._)– The field o’ Lexin’ton, where England tried The fastest colors thet she ever dyed,– An’ Concord Bridge, thet Davis, when he came, Found was the bee-line track to heaven an’ fame,– Ez all roads be by natur’, ef your soul Don’t sneak thru shun-pikes so’s to save the toll.

They’re ‘most too fur away, take too much time To visit often, ef it ain’t in rhyme;
But there’s a walk thet’s hendier, a sight, An’ suits me fust-rate of a winter’s night,– I mean the round whale’s-back o’ Prospect Hill. I love to loiter there while night grows still, An’ in the twinklin’ villages about,
Fust here, then there, the well-saved lights goes out, An’ nary sound but watch-dogs’ false alarms, Or muffled cock-crows from the drowsy farms, Where some wise rooster (men act jest thet way) Stands to’t thet moon-rise is the break o’ day: So Mister Seward sticks a three-months pin Where the war’d oughto end, then tries agin;– My gran’ther’s rule was safer’n ‘t is to crow: _Don’t never prophesy–onless ye know._

I love to muse there till it kind o’ seems Ez ef the world went eddyin’ off in dreams. The Northwest wind thet twitches at my baird Blows out o’ sturdier days not easy scared, An’ the same moon thet this December shines Starts out the tents an’ booths o’ Putnam’s lines; The rail-fence posts, acrost the hill thet runs, Turn ghosts o’ sogers should’rin’ ghosts o’ guns; Ez wheels the sentry, glints a flash o’ light Along the firelock won at Concord Fight, An’ ‘twixt the silences, now fur, now nigh, Rings the sharp chellenge, hums the low reply. Ez I was settin’ so, it warn’t long sence, Mixin’ the perfect with the present tense, I heerd two voices som’ers in the air,
Though, ef I was to die, I can’t tell where: Voices I call ’em: ‘t was a kind o’ sough Like pine-trees thet the wind is geth’rin’ through; An’, fact, I thought it _was_ the wind a spell,– Then some misdoubted,–couldn’t fairly tell,– Fust sure, then not, jest as you hold an eel,– I knowed, an’ didn’t,–fin’lly seemed to feel ‘T was Concord Bridge a-talkin’ off to kill With the Stone Spike thet’s druv thru Bunker Hill: Whether’t was so, or ef I only dreamed, I couldn’t say; I tell it ez it seemed.


Wal, neighbor, tell us, wut’s turned up thet’s new? You’re younger’n I be,–nigher Boston, tu; An’ down to Boston, ef you take their showin’, Wut they don’t know ain’t hardly wuth the knowin’. There’s _sunthin’_ goin’ on, I know: las’ night The British sogers killed in our gret fight (Nigh fifty year they hedn’t stirred nor spoke) Made sech a coil you’d thought a dam hed broke: Why, one he up an’ beat a revellee
With his own crossbones on a holler tree, Till all the graveyards swarmed out like a hive With faces I hain’t seen sence Seventy-five. Wut _is_ the news? ‘T ain’t good, or they’d be cheerin’. Speak slow an’ clear, for I’m some hard o’ hearin’.


I don’t know hardly ef it’s good or bad,–


At wust, it can’t be wus than wut we’ve had.


You know them envys thet the Rebbles sent, An’ Cap’n Wilkes he borried o’ the Trent?


Wut! hev they hanged ’em? Then their wits is gone! Thet’s a sure way to make a goose a swan!


No: England she _would_ hev ’em, _Fee, Faw, Fum!_ (Ez though she hedn’t fools enough to home,) So they’ve returned ’em–


_Hev_ they? Wal, by heaven,
Thet’s the wust news I’ve heerd sence Seventy-seven! _By George_, I meant to say, though I declare It’s ‘most enough to make a deacon, swear.


Now don’t go off half-cock: folks never gains By usin’ pepper-sarse instid o’ brains. Come, neighbor, you don’t understand–


How? Hey?
Not understand? Why, wut’s to hender, pray? Must I go huntin’ round to find a chap
To tell me when my face hez hed a slap?


See here: the British they found out a flaw In Cap’n Wilkes’s readin’ o’ the law:
(They _make_ all laws, you know, an’ so, o’ course, It’s nateral they should understand their force:) He’d oughto took the vessel into port,
An’ hed her sot on by a reg’lar court; She was a mail-ship, an’ a steamer, tu, An’ thet, they say, hez changed the pint o’ view, Coz the old practice, bein’ meant for sails, Ef tried upon a steamer, kind o’ falls; You _may_ take out despatches, but you mus’n’t Take nary man–


You mean to say, you dus’n’t! Changed pint o’ view! No, no,–it’s overboard With law an’ gospel, when their ox is gored! I tell ye, England’s law, on sea an’ land, Hez ollers ben, “_I’ve gut the heaviest hand_.” Take nary man? Fine preachin’ from _her_ lips! Why, she hez taken hunderds from our ships, An’ would agin, an’ swear she hed a right to, Ef we warn’t strong enough to be perlite to. Of all the sarse thet I can call to mind, England _doos_ make the most onpleasant kind: It’s you’re the sinner ollers, she’s the saint; Wut’s good’s all English, all thet isn’t ain’t; Wut profits her is ollers right an’ just, An’ ef you don’t read Scriptur so, you must; She’s praised herself ontil she fairly thinks There ain’t no light in Natur when she winks; Hain’t she the Ten Comman’ments in her pus? Could the world stir ‘thout she went, tu, ez nus? She ain’t like other mortals, thet’s a fact: _She_ never stopped the habus-corpus act, Nor specie payments, nor she never yet
Cut down the int’rest on her public debt; _She_ don’t put down rebellions, lets ’em breed, An’ ‘s ollers willin’ Ireland should secede; She’s all thet’s honest, honnable, an’ fair, An’ when the vartoos died they made her heir.


Wal, wal, two wrongs don’t never make a right; Ef we’re mistaken, own it, an’ don’t fight: For gracious’ sake, hain’t we enough to du ‘Thout gittin’ up a fight with England, tu? She thinks we’re rabble-rid——


An’ so we can’t
Distinguish ‘twixt _You oughtn’t_ an’ _You shan’t!_ She jedges by herself; she’s no idear
How ‘t stiddies folks to give ’em their fair sheer: The odds ‘twixt her an’ us is plain’s a steeple,– Her People’s turned to Mob, our Mob’s turned People.


She’s riled jes’ now——


Plain proof her cause ain’t strong,– The one thet fust gits mad’s most ollers wrong.


You’re ollers quick to set your back aridge,– Though’t suits a tom-cat more ‘n a sober bridge: Don’t you git het: they thought the thing was planned; They’ll cool off when they come to understand.


Ef _thet’s_ wilt you expect, you’ll _hev_ to wait: Folks never understand the folks they hate: She’ll fin’ some other grievance jest ez good, ‘Fore the month’s out, to git misunderstood. England cool off! She’ll do it, ef she sees She’s run her head into a swarm o’ bees. I ain’t so prejudiced ez wut you spose: I hev thought England was the best thet goes; Remember, (no, you can’t,) when _I_ was reared, _God save the King_ was all the tune you heerd: But it’s enough to turn Wachuset roun’, This stumpin’ fellers when you think they’re down.


But, neighbor, ef they prove their claim at law, The best way is to settle, an’ not jaw. An’ don’t le’ ‘s mutter ’bout the awfle bricks We’ll give ’em, ef we ketch ’em in a fix: That ‘ere’s most frequently the kin’ o’ talk Of critters can’t be kicked to toe the chalk; Your “You’ll see _nex’_ time!” an’ “Look out bimeby!” Most ollers ends in eatin’ umble-pie.
‘T wun’t pay to scringe to England: will it pay To fear thet meaner bully, old “They’ll say”? Suppose they _du_ say: words are dreffle bores, But they ain’t quite so bad ez seventy-fours. Wut England wants is jest a wedge to fit Where it’ll help to widen out our split: She’s found her wedge, an’ ‘t ain’t for us to come An’ lend the beetle thet’s to drive it home. For growed-up folks like us ‘t would be a scandle, When we git sarsed, to fly right off the handle. England ain’t _all_ bad, coz she thinks us blind: Ef she can’t change her skin, she can her mind; An’ you will see her change it double-quick, Soon ez we’ve proved thet we’re a-goin’ to lick. She an’ Columby’s gut to be fas’ friends; For the world prospers by their privit ends: ‘T would put the clock back all o’ fifty years, Ef they should fall together by the ears.


You may be right; but hearken in your ear,– I’m older ‘n you,–Peace wun’t keep house with Fear: Ef you want peace, the thing you’ve gut to du Is jest to show you’re up to fightin’, tu. _I_ recollect how sailors’ rights was won Yard locked in yard, hot gun-lip kissin’ gun: Why, afore thet, John Bull sot up thet he Hed gut a kind o’ mortgage on the sea;
You’d thought he held by Gran’ther Adam’s will, An’ ef you knuckle down, _he_’ll think so still. Better thet all our ships an’ all their crews Should sink to rot in ocean’s dreamless ooze, Each torn flag wavin’ chellenge ez it went, An’ each dumb gun a brave man’s moniment, Than seek sech peace ez only cowards crave: Give me the peace of dead men or of brave!


I say, ole boy, it ain’t the Glorious Fourth: You’d oughto learned ‘fore this wut talk wuz worth. It ain’t _our_ nose thet gits put out o’ jint; It’s England thet gives up her dearest pint. We’ve gut, I tell ye now, enough to du
In our own fem’ly fight, afore we’re thru. I hoped, las’ spring, jest arter Sumter’s shame, When every flag-staff flapped its tethered flame, An’ all the people, startled from their doubt, Come must’rin’ to the flag with sech a shout,–

I hoped to see things settled ‘fore this fall, The Rebbles licked, Jeff Davis hanged, an’ all; Then come Bull Run, an’ _sence_ then I’ve ben waitin’ Like boys in Jennooary thaw for skatin’, Nothin’ to du but watch my shadder’s trace Swing, like a ship at anchor, roun’ my base, With daylight’s flood an’ ebb: it’s gittin’ slow, An’ I ‘most think we’d better let ’em go. I tell ye wut, this war’s a-goin’ to cost–


An’ I tell _you_ it wun’t be money lost; Taxes milks dry, but, neighbor, you’ll allow Thet havin’ things onsettled kills the cow: We’ve gut to fix this thing for good an’ all; It’s no use buildin’ wut’s a-goin’ to fall. I’m older ‘n you, an’ I’ve seen things an’ men, An’ here’s wut my experience hez ben:
Folks thet worked thorough was the ones thet thriv, But bad work follers ye ez long’s ye live; You can’t git red on ‘t; jest ez sure ez sin, It’s ollers askin’ to be done agin:
Ef we should part, it wouldn’t be a week ‘Fore your soft-soddered peace would spring aleak. We’ve turned our cuffs up, but, to put her thru, We must git mad an’ off with jackets, tu; ‘T wun’t du to think thet killin’ ain’t perlite,– You’ve gut to be in airnest, ef you fight; Why, two-thirds o’ the Rebbles ‘ould cut dirt, Ef they once thought thet Guv’ment meant to hurt; An’ I _du_ wish our Gin’rals hed in mind The folks in front more than the folks behind; You wun’t do much ontil you think it’s God, An’ not constitoounts, thet holds the rod; We want some more o’ Gideon’s sword, I jedge, For proclamations hain’t no gret of edge; There’s nothin’ for a cancer but the knife, Onless you set by ‘t more than by your life. _I_’ve seen hard times; I see a war begun Thet folks thet love their bellies never’d won,– Pharo’s lean kine hung on for seven long year,– But when’t was done, we didn’t count it dear. Why, law an’ order, honor, civil right, Ef they _ain’t_ wuth it, wut _is_ wuth a fight? I’m older ‘n you: the plough, the axe, the mill, All kinds o’ labor an’ all kinds o’ skill, Would be a rabbit in a wile-cat’s claw, Ef’t warn’t for thet slow critter, ‘stablished law; Onsettle _thet_, an’ all the world goes whiz, A screw is loose in everythin’ there is: Good buttresses once settled, don’t you fret An’ stir ’em: take a bridge’s word for thet! Young folks are smart, but all ain’t good thet’s new; I guess the gran’thers they knowed sunthin’, tu.


Amen to thet! build sure in the beginning’, An’ then don’t never tech the underpinnin’: Th’ older a Guv’ment is, the better ‘t suits; New ones hunt folks’s corns out like new boots: Change jest for change is like those big hotels Where they shift plates, an’ let ye live on smells.


Wal, don’t give up afore the ship goes down: It’s a stiff gale, but Providence wun’t drown; An’ God wun’t leave us yet to sink or swim, Ef we don’t fail to du wut ‘s right by Him. This land o’ ourn, I tell ye, ‘s gut to be A better country than man ever see.
I feel my sperit swellin’ with a cry Thet seems to say, “Break forth an’ prophesy!” O strange New World, thet yet wast never young, Whose youth from thee by gripin’ need was wrung,– Brown foundlin’ o’ the woods, whose baby-bed Was prowled round by the Injun’s cracklin’ tread, An’ who grew’st strong thru shifts an’ wants an’ pains, Nussed by stern men with empires in their brains, Who saw in vision their young Ishmel strain With each hard hand a vassal ocean’s mane,– Thou, skilled by Freedom an’ by gret events To pitch new States ez Old-World men pitch tents,– Thou, taught by Fate to know Jehovah’s plan Thet only manhood ever makes a man,
An’ whose free latch-string never was drawed in Aginst the poorest child o’ Adam’s kin,– The grave’s not dug where traitor hands shall lay In fearful haste thy murdered corse away! I see—-

Jest here some dogs began to bark, So thet I lost old Concord’s last remark: I listened long, but all I seemed to hear Was dead leaves goss’pin’ on some birch-trees near; But ez they hedn’t no gret things to say, An’ said ’em often, I come right away,
An’, walkin’ home’ards, jest to pass the time, I put some thoughts thet bothered me in rhyme: I hain’t hed time to fairly try ’em on, But here they be,–it’s


It don’t seem hardly right, John,
When both my hands was full,
To stump me to a fight, John,–
Your cousin, tu, John Bull!
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess
We know it now,” sez he,
“The lion’s paw is all the law,
Accordin’ to J.B.,
Thet’s fit for you an’ me!”

Blood ain’t so cool as ink, John:
It’s likely you’d ha’ wrote,
An’ stopped a spell to think, John, _Arter_ they’d cut your throat?
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess
He’d skurce ha’ stopped,” sez he, “To mind his p-s an’ q-s, ef thet weasan’ Hed b’longed to ole J.B.,
Instid o’ you an’ me!”

Ef _I_ turned mad dogs loose, John,
On _your_ front-parlor stairs,
Would it jest meet your views, John, To wait an’ sue their heirs?
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess,
I on’y guess,” sez he,
“Thet, ef Vattel on _his_ toes fell, ‘T would kind o’ rile J.B.,
Ez wal ez you an’ me!”

Who made the law thet hurts, John,
_Heads I win,–ditto, tails?_
“_J.B._” was on his shirts, John,
Onless my memory fails.
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess,
(I’m good at thet,)” sez he,
“Thet sauce for goose ain’t _jest_ the juice For ganders with J.B.,
No more than you or me!”

When your rights was our wrongs, John, You didn’t stop for fuss,–
Britanny’s trident-prongs, John,
Was good ‘nough law for us.
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess,
Though physic’s good,” sez he,
“It doesn’t foller thet he can swaller Prescriptions signed ‘J.B.,’
Put up by you an’ me!”

We own the ocean, tu, John:
You mus’n’t take it hard,
Ef we can’t think with you, John,
It’s jest your own back-yard.
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess,
Ef _thet’s_ his claim,” sez he,
“The fencin’-stuff ‘ll cost enough To bust up friend J.B.,
Ez wal ez you an’ me!”

Why talk so dreffle big, John,
Of honor, when it meant
You didn’t care a fig, John,
But jest for _ten per cent_.?
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess,
He’s like the rest,” sez he:
“When all is done, it’s number one Thet’s nearest to J.B.,
Ez wal ez you an’ me!”

We give the critters back, John,
Coz Abram thought ‘t was right;
It warn’t your bullyin’ clack, John, Provokin’ us to fight.
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess
We’ve a hard row,” sez he,
“To hoe jest now; but thet, somehow, May heppen to J.B.,
Ez wal ez you an’ me!”

We ain’t so weak an’ poor, John,
With twenty million people,
An’ close to every door, John,
A school-house an’ a steeple.
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess
It is a fact,” sez he,
“The surest plan to make a Man
Is, Think him so, J.B.,
Ez much ez you or me!”

Our folks believe in Law, John;
An’ it’s for her sake, now,
They’ve left the axe an’ saw, John, The anvil an’ the plough.
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess,
Ef’t warn’t for law,” sez he,
“There’d be one shindy from here to Indy; An’ thet don’t suit J.B.
(When’t ain’t ‘twixt you an’ me!)”

We know we’ve gut a cause, John,
Thet’s honest, just, an’ true;
We thought’t would win applause, John, Ef nowheres else, from you.
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess
His love of right,” sez he,
“Hangs by a rotten fibre o’ cotton: There’s natur’ in J.B.,
Ez wal ez you an’ me!”

The South says, “_Poor folks down!_” John, An’ “_All men up!_” say we,–
“White, yaller, black, an’ brown, John: Now which is your idee?”
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess, John preaches wal,” sez he;
“But, sermon thru, an’ come to _du_, Why, there’s the old J.B.
A-crowdin’ you an’ me!”

Shall it be love or hate, John?
It’s you thet’s to decide;
Ain’t _your_ bonds held by Fate, John, Like all the world’s beside?
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess
Wise men forgive,” sez he,
“But not forget; an’ some time yet Thet truth may strike J.B.,
Ez wal ez you an’ me!”

God means to make this land, John,
Clear thru, from sea to sea,
Believe an’ understand, John,
The _wuth_ o’ bein’ free.
Ole Uncle S. sez he, “I guess, God’s price is high,” sez he;
“But nothin’ else than wut He sells Wears long, an’ thet J.B.
May learn like you an’ me!”

* * * * *


_The Cloister and the Hearth; or, Maid, Wife, and Widow_. A Matter-of-Fact Romance. By CHARLES READE, Author of “Never too Late to Mend,” etc., etc. New York: Rudd & Carleton. 8vo.

The novels of Charles Reade are generally marked not only by individuality of genius, but by individualisms of egotism and caprice. The latter provoke the reader almost as much as the former gives him delight. It disturbs the least critical mind to find the keenest insight in company with the loudest bravado, and the statement of a wise or beautiful thought followed up by a dogmatic assertion of infallibility as harsh as a slap on the face. The indisposition to recognize such a genius comes from the fact that he irritates as well as stimulates the minds he addresses. Everybody reads him, but the fooling he inspires is made up of admiration and exasperation. The public is both delighted and insulted. He not only does not attempt to conceal his contemptuous sense of superiority to common men, but he absolutely screeches and bawls it out. Fearful that the dull Anglo-Saxon mind cannot appreciate his finest strokes, he emphasizes his inspirations not merely by Italics, but by capitals, thus conveying his brightest wit and deepest contrivances by a kind of typographic yell. Were there not a solid foundation of observation, learning, genius, and conscience to his work, his egotistic eccentricities would awake a tempest of hisses. Being, in reality, superficial and not central, they are readily pardoned by discerning critics. Even these, however, must object to his disposition to cluck or crow, in a manner altogether unseemly, whenever he hits upon a thought of more than ordinary delicacy or depth.

It is but just to say, in palliation of this fault, that Mr. Reade’s insolent tone is not peculiar to him. It characterizes almost every prominent person who has attempted to mould the opinions of the age. We find it in Macaulay, Carlyle, Ruskin, and Kingsley, as well as in Reade. Modesty is not the characteristic of the genius of the nineteenth century; and the last thing we look for in any powerful work of the present day is toleration for other minds and opposing opinions. Each capable person who puts in his thumb and pulls out a plum draws instantly the same inference which occurred to the first explorer of the Christmas-pie. Charles Reade has no reservation at all, and boldly echoes Master Horner’s sage conclusion.

“The Cloister and the Hearth,” in spite of its faults, is really a great book. It is a positive contribution to history as well as to romance. It would be vain to point to any other volume which could convey to common minds so clear and accurate a conception of European life in the fifteenth century as this. The author has deeply studied the annals, memoirs, and histories which record the peculiarities of that life, and he has carried into the study a knowledge of those powers and passions of human nature which are the same in every age. The result is a “romance of history” which contains more essential truth than the most labored histories; for the writer is a man who has both the heart to feel and the imagination to conceive the realities of the time about which he writes.

The characterization of the book is original, various, and powerful. It ranges from the lowest hind to the most exquisite representative of female tenderness and purity. The scenes of passion show a clear conception of and a strong hold upon the emotional elements of character, and a capacity to exhibit their most terrible workings in language which seems identical with the feelings it so burningly expresses. In vigor and vividness of description and narration the novel excels any of Reade’s previous books. The plot is about the same as that of “The Good Fight,” though the _denouement_ is different. “The Cloister and the Hearth,” indeed, incorporates “The Good Fight” in its pages, but the latter forms not more than a fourth of the extended work. Altogether the romance must be classed among the best which have appeared during the last twenty years.

_Lessons in Life_. A Series of Familiar Essays. By TIMOTHY TITCOMB. New York: Charles Scribner, 16 mo.

Who is more popular than honest Timothy? Opening this, his latest volume, we read on, a fly-leaf fronting the title-page that twenty-six editions of the “Letters to Young People,” fifteen editions each of “Bitter-Sweet” and “Gold Foil,” and thirteen editions of “Miss Gilbert’s Career” have gone the way of all good books. The author says, in his modest preface to the “Lessons,” that he can hardly pretend to have done more than to organize and put into form the average thinking of those who read his books, and be only claims for his essays that they possess the quality of common sense. He herein pays a very high compliment to the crowd which demands over the bookseller’s counter so many thousands of his volumes. Wisdom, admirably put, is not a commodity glutting the market every day. We find in the pages of this new venture so many healthy maxims and so much excellent advice, that we hope the volume will spread itself farther and wider than any of its predecessors. This wish fulfilled will give it no mean circulation. “The Ways of Charity,” one of the papers in this volume, ought to be printed in tract form, and scattered broadcast everywhere. And there are other articles in the book quite as good as this.

_English Sacred Poetry of the Sixteenth, Seventeenth, Eighteenth, and Nineteenth Centuries._ Selected and edited by ROBERT ARIS WILLMOTT, M.A. Illustrated by Holman Hunt, John Gilbert, and others. London: Routledge & Co. 4to.

Mr. Willmott has considerable reputation for judgment and taste as a compiler. He knows a good poem afar off, and his chief pleasure seems to lie in reproducing from old books the excellent things that time has spared to us. His last contribution to the stock of elegant volumes is this very handsome book of English Sacred Poetry. The illustrations are by no means equally good, but the majority of them are satisfactory. Delicious bits of English landscape scenery peep out along the pages, as one turns the leaves of this beautiful collection. An old village church rising among the graves of centuries, a bird’s-nest snug and warm in the boughs of a mossy tree, a group of old-time worshippers gathered on the grass, a brook making its way through flower-enamelled banks, a shepherd with his flock couched on the hill-side, and other similar scenes of quiet and rest, abound in this volume. The printer and the binder have produced as luxurious a specimen of their respective arts as we have seen from the British holiday press.

* * * * *



The Cotton Kingdom: A Traveller’s Observations on Cotton and Slavery in the American Slave States. Based upon Three Former Volumes of Journeys and Investigations by the Same Author. By Frederic Law Olmsted. In Two Volumes. New York. Mason Brothers. 12mo. pp. viii., 376; 404. $2.00.

The Last Political Writings of General Nathaniel Lyon, U.S.A. With a Sketch of his Life and Military Services. New York. Rudd & Carleton. 12mo. pp. 275. $1.00.

The Lamplighter’s Story; Hunted Down; The Detective Police, and other Nouvellettes. By Charles Dickens. Philadelphia. T.B. Peterson & Brothers. 12mo. pp. 467. $1.50.

Poems. By John G. Saxe. Complete in One Volume. Blue and Gold. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 32mo. pp. vi., 308. 75 cts.

Elijah, a Sacred Drama, and other Poems. By Rev. Robert Davidson, D.D. New York. C. Scribner. 16mo. pp. 184. 75 cts.

Works of Charles Dickens. Household Edition. Illustrated from Drawings by F.O.C. Darley and John Gilbert. The Old Curiosity-Shop. In Three Volumes. New York. J.G. Gregory. 16mo. pp. viii., 303; 299; 298. $2.25.

National Hymns: How they are Written, and how they are not Written. A Lyric and National Study for the Times. By Richard Grant White. New York. Rudd & Carleton. 12mo. pp. 152. $1.00.

A Manual of Elementary Geometrical Drawing, involving Three Dimensions. Designed for Use in High Schools, Academies, Engineering Schools, etc.; and for the Self-Instruction of Inventors, Artisans, etc. In Five Divisions. By S. Edward Warren, C.E., Professor of Descriptive Geometry and Geometrical Drawing in Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y., and Author of a Treatise on the Orthographic Projections of Descriptive Geometry. New York. John Wiley. 12mo. pp. x., 105. $1.25.

For Better, for Worse. A Love Story. From “Temple Bar.” Philadelphia. T.B. Peterson & Brothers. 8vo. paper, pp. 173. 25 cts.

Commentary on the Epistles to the Seven Churches in Asia. Revelation, II., III. By Richard Chenevix Trench, D.D., Dean of Westminster. New York. C. Scribner. 12mo. pp. 3l2. $1.00.

Songs in Many Keys. By Oliver Wendell Holmes. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. x., 308. $1.25.

Lessons in Life. A Series of Familiar Essays. By Timothy Titcomb, Author of “Letters to the Young,” “Gold Foil,” etc. New York. C. Scribner. 12mo. pp. 344. $1.00.

Wolfert’s Roost, and other Papers. Now first collected. By Washington Irving. Author’s Revised Edition. New York. G.P. Putnam. 12mo. pp. 383, 46. $1.50.