[Footnote 264: C.I.L., XIV, 2855, 2626, 3336.]
[Footnote 265: C.I.L., XIV, 3116. It may not be on a pigna.]
[Footnote 266: Not. d. Scavi, 1907, p. 131. The nomen Paccia is a common name in the sepulchral inscriptions of Rome. C.I.L., VI, 23653-23675, but all are of a late date.]
[Footnote 267: C.I.L., IX, 5016: C. Capive Vitali (Hadria).]
[Footnote 268: A better restoration than Ninn(eius). The (N)inneius Sappaeus (C.I.L., VI, 33610) is a freedman, and the inscription is late.]
[Footnote 269: In the year 216 B.C. the Ninnii Celeres were hostages of Hannibal’s at Capua (Livy XXIII, 8).]
[Footnote 270: C.I.L., X, 2776-2779, but all late.]
[Footnote 271: C.I.L., X, 885-886. A Ninnius was procurator to Domitian, according to a fistula plumbea found at Rome (Bull. Com., 1882, p. 171, n. 597). A.Q. Ninnius Hasta was consul ordinarius in 114 A.D. (C.I.L., XI, 3614, compare Paulus, Dig. 48, 8, 5 [Corpus Iuris Civ., I, p. 802]). See also a Ninnius Crassus, Dessau, Prosographia Imp. Romani, II, p. 407, n. 79.]
[Footnote 272: It is interesting to note that C. Paccius and C. Ninnius are officials, one would guess duovirs, of the same year in Pompeii, and thus parallel the men here in Praeneste: C.I.L., X, 885-886: N. Paccius Chilo and M. Ninnius Pollio, who in 14 B.C. are duoviri v.a.s.p.p. (viis annonae sacris publicis procurandis), Henzen; (votis Augustalibus sacris publicis procurandis), Mommsen; (viis aedibus, etc.), Cagnat; See Liebenam in Pauly-Wissowa, Real Encyc., V, 1842, 9.]
[Footnote 273: Liebenam in Pauly-Wissowa, Real Encyc., V, 1806.]
[Footnote 274: Marquardt, Staatsverw., I, p. 157 ff.; Liebenam in Pauly-Wissowa, Real Enc., V, 1825. Sometimes the officers were designated simply quinquennales, and this seems to have been the early method. For all the various differences in the title, see Marquardt, l.c., p. 160, n. 13.]
[Footnote 275: All at least except the regimen morum, so Marquardt, l.c., p. 162 and n. 2.]
[Footnote 276: Marquardt, Staatsverw., I, p. 161, n. 6.]
[Footnote 277: Marquardt, Staatsverw., I, p. 161, n. 7.]
[Footnote 278: Beloch, Italischer Bund, p. 78 ff.; Nissen, Italische Landeskunde, II, p. 99 ff.]
[Footnote 279: C.I.L., IX, 422 = Dessau, Insc. Lat. Sel., 6123.]
[Footnote 280: C.I.L., X, 1233 = Dessau 6124.]
[Footnote 281: Near Aquinum. C.I.L., X, 5405 = Dessau 6125.]
[Footnote 282: C.I.L., XIV, 245 = Dessau 6126.]
[Footnote 283: C.I.L., XIV, 2964.]
[Footnote 284: He is not even mentioned in Pauly-Wissowa or Ruggiero.]
[Footnote 285: C.I.L., XIV, 2966.]
[Footnote 286: C.I.L., XIV, 2964.]
[Footnote 287: C.I.L., XIV, 2965.]
[Footnote 288: Marquardt, Staatsverw., I, p. 169 for full discussion, with references to other cases.]
[Footnote 289: C.I.L., XIV, 172: praet(or) Laur(entium) Lavin(atium) IIIIvir q(uin) q(uennalis) Faesulis.]
[Footnote 290: C.I.L., XIV, 3599.]
[Footnote 291: C.I.L., XIV, 3609.]
[Footnote 292: C.I.L., XIV, 3650.]
[Footnote 293: C.I.L., I, 1236 == X, 1573 == Dessau 6345.]
[Footnote 294: C.I.L., XIV, 3665.]
[Footnote 295: C.I.L., XI, 421 == Dessau 6662.]
[Footnote 296: C. Alfius C.f. Lem. Ruf(us) IIvir quin(q). col. Iul. Hispelli et IIvir quinq. in municipio suo Casini, C.I.L., XI, 5278 == Dessau 6624. Bormann, C.I.L., XI, p. 766, considers this to be an inscription of the time of Augustus and thinks the man here mentioned is one of his colonists.]
[Footnote 297: Not. d. Scav, 1884, p. 418 == Dessau 6598.]
[Footnote 298: C.I.L., IX, 5831 == Dessau 6572.]
[Footnote 299: C.I.L., IX, 3311 == Dessau 6532.]
[Footnote 300: L. Septimio L.f. Arn. Calvo. aed., IIIIvir. i.d., praef. ex s.c. [q]uinquennalicia potestate, etc., Eph. Ep. 8, 120 == Dessau 6527.]
[Footnote 301: C.I.L., IX, 1618 == Dessau 6507.]
[Footnote 302: C.I.L., IX, 652 == Dessau 6481.]
[Footnote 303: The full title is worth notice: IIIIvir i(ure) d(icundo) q(uinquennalis) c(ensoria) p(otestate), C.I.L., X, 49 == Dessau 6463.]
[Footnote 304: C.I.L., X, 344 == Dessau 6450.]
[Footnote 305: C.I.L., X, 1036 == Dessau 6365.]
[Footnote 306: C.I.L., X, 840 == Dessau 6362: M. Holconio Celeri d.v.i.d. quinq. designato. Augusti sacerdoti.]
[Footnote 307: C.I.L., X, 1273 == Dessau 6344.]
[Footnote 308: C.I.L., X, 4641 == Dessau 6301.]
[Footnote 309: C.I.L., X, 5401 == Dessau 6291.]
[Footnote 310: C.I.L., X, 5393 == Dessau 6286.]
[Footnote 311: C.I.L., XIV, 4148.]
[Footnote 312: C.I.L., XIV, 4097, 4105a, 4106f.]
[Footnote 313: C.I.L., XIV, 2795.]
[Footnote 314: C.I.L., XIV, 4237. Another case of the same kind is seen in the fragment C.I.L., XIV, 4247.]
[Footnote 315: Zangemeister, C.I.L., IV., Index, shows 75 duoviri and but 4 quinquennales.]
[Footnote 316: L. Veranius Hypsaeus 6 times: C.I.L., IV, 170, 187, 193, 200, 270, 394(?). Q. Postumius Modestus 7 times: 195, 279, 736, 756, 786, 1156. Only two other men appear, one 3 times; 214, 596, 824, the other once: 504.]
[Footnote 317: (1) Verulae, C.I.L., X, 5796; Acerrae, C.I.L., X, 3759; (2) Anagnia, C.I.L., X, 5919; Allifae, C.I.L., IX, 2354; Aeclanum, C.I.L., IX, 1160; (3) Sutrium, C.I.L., XI, 3261; Tergeste, C.I.L., V, 545; (4) Tibur, C.I.L., XIV, 3665; Ausculum Apulorum, C.I.L., IX, 668; Sora, C.I.L, X, 5714; (5) Formiae, C.I.L., X, 6101; Pompeii, C.I.L., X, 1036; (6) Ferentinum, C.I.L., X, 5844, 5853; Falerii, C.I.L., XI, 3123; (7) Pompeii, Not. d. Scavi, 1898, p. 171, and C.I.L., X, 788, 789, 851; Bovianum, C.I.L., IX, 2568; (8) Telesia, C.I.L., IX, 2234; Allifae, C.I.L., IX, 2353; Hispellum, C.I.L., XI, 5283.]
[Footnote 318: The same certainly as M. Antonius Sobarus of 4091,17 and duovir with T. Diadumenius, as is shown by the connective et. Compare 4091, 4, 6, 7.]
[Footnote 319: C.I.L., I, p. 311 reads Lucius, which is certainly wrong. There is but one Lucius in Dessau, Prosographia Imp. Rom.; there is however a Lucilius with this same cognomen Dessau, l.c.]
[Footnote 320: Probably not the M. Iuventius Laterensis, the Roman quaestor, for the brick stamps of Praeneste in other cases seem to show the quaestors of the city.]