Full Text Archive logoFull Text Archive — Free Classic E-books

The Public Orations of Demosthenes, volume 2 by Demosthenes

Part 1 out of 4

Adobe PDF icon
Download this document as a .pdf
File size: 0.4 MB
What's this? light bulb idea Many people prefer to read off-line or to print out text and read from the real printed page. Others want to carry documents around with them on their mobile phones and read while they are on the move. We have created .pdf files of all out documents to accommodate all these groups of people. We recommend that you download .pdfs onto your mobile phone when it is connected to a WiFi connection for reading off-line.

Anne Soulard, Jon Ingram and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.




[_Introduction_. Late in the year 343 (some time after the acquittal of
Aeschines) Philip invaded Epirus, made Alexander, brother of his wife
Olympias, king of the Molossi instead of Arybbas, and so secured, his own
influence in that region. Arybbas was honourably received at Athens.
Philip next threatened Ambracia and Leucas, which were colonies of
Corinth, and promised to restore Naupactus, which was in the hands of the
Achaeans, to the Aetolians. But Athens sent Demosthenes, Hegesippus,
Polyeuctus and others to rouse the Corinthians to resistance, and also
dispatched a force of citizens to Acarnania to help in the defence against
Philip. Philip thereupon returned, captured Echinus and Nicaea on the
Malian Gulf, and established a tetrarch in each division of Thessaly (343
B.C., or early in 342). In 342 Philistides was established, by Philip's
influence, as tyrant at Oreus in Euboea (as Cleitarchus had been at
Eretria in the preceding year), and the democratic leader Euphraeus
committed suicide in prison.[1] The town of Chalcis, however, under
Callias and Taurosthenes, remained friendly to Athens, and made a treaty
of alliance with her.

About the same time a controversy, begun in the previous year, in regard
to Halonnesus, was renewed. This island had belonged to Athens, but had
been occupied by pirates. At some time not recorded (but probably since
the Peace of 346) Philip had expelled the pirates and taken possession of
the island. He now sent a letter, offering to give Halonnesus to Athens,
but not to _give it back_ (since this would concede their right to it); or
else to submit the dispute to arbitration. He also offered to discuss a
treaty for the settlement of private disputes between Athenians and
Macedonians, and to concert measures with Athens for clearing the Aegean
of pirates. He was willing to extend the advantages of the Peace to other
Greek States, but not to agree that he and Athens should respectively
possess 'what was their own', instead of 'what they held'; though he was
ready to submit to arbitration in regard to Cardia and other disputed
places. He again denied having made the promises attributed to him, and
asked for the punishment of those who slandered him. Hegesippus replied in
an extant speech ('On Halonnesus'), while Demosthenes insisted that no
impartial arbitrator could possibly be found. Philip's terms in regard to
Halonnesus were refused, but the Athenian claim to the island was not

Philip spent the greater part of 342 and 341 in Thrace, mainly in the
valley of the Hebrus, where he endured very great hardships through the
winter, and founded colonies of Macedonian soldiers, the chief of these
being Philippopolis and Cabyle. He also entered into relations with the
Getae, beyond the Haemus, and garrisoned Apollonia on the Euxine. These
operations were all preparatory to his projected attack upon Byzantium.
(Byzantium and Athens were at this time on unfriendly terms, owing to the
part taken by the latter in the Social War.)

But the immediate subject of the present Speech was the state of affairs
in the Chersonese in 342. The Chersonese (with the exception of Cardia)
had been secured for Athens in 357, but had been threatened by Philip in
352,[2] when he made alliance with Cardia, and forced the neighbouring
Thracian Prince Cersobleptes to submit. Soon after the Peace of
Philocrates, Athens sent settlers to the Chersonese under Diopeithes.
Cardia alone refused to receive them, and Diopeithes, with a mercenary
force, prepared to compel the Cardians to admit them; while Philip sent
troops to hold the town, and complained to Athens in threatening terms of
the actions of Diopeithes, and more particularly of an inroad which
Diopeithes had made upon Philip's territory in Thrace. Diopeithes had been
ill-supported with money and men by Athens, and had had recourse to
piratical actions, in order to obtain supplies, thus arousing some
indignation at Athens; but the prospect of the heavy expenditure which
would be necessary, if an expedition were sent to his aid, was also
unattractive. Demosthenes, however, proposed that Diopeithes should be
vigorously supported, on the ground that Philip was really at war with
Athens, and that this was not the time to interfere with the general who
alone was pushing the Athenian cause. The speech was delivered early in
the spring of 341. It is a masterpiece of oratory, at once statesmanlike
and impassioned, and shows a complete command of every variety of tone.
The latter part of it contains a strong denunciation of the Macedonian
party in Athens, a defence of the orator's own career, and an urgent
demand for the punishment of disloyalty. At the same time Demosthenes does
not embody the policy which he advises in any formal motion. For this we
have to wait for the Third Philippic.]

{1} It was the duty, men of Athens, of every speaker not to allow either
malice or favour to influence any speech which he might make, but simply
to declare the policy which he considered to be the best, particularly
when your deliberations were concerned with public affairs of great
importance. But since there are some who are led on to address you, partly
out of contentiousness, partly from causes which I need not discuss, it is
for you, men of Athens--you, the People--to dismiss all other
considerations, and both in the votes that you give and in the measures
that you take to attend solely to what you believe to be for the good of
the city. {2} Now our present anxiety arises out of affairs in the
Chersonese, and the campaign, now in its eleventh month, which Philip is
conducting in Thrace. But most of the speeches which we have heard have
been about the acts and intentions of Diopeithes. For my part, I conceive
that all charges made against any one who is amenable to the laws and can
be punished by you when you will are matters which you are free to
investigate, either immediately or after an interval, as you think fit;
and there is no occasion for me or any one else to use strong language
about them. {3} But all those advantages which an actual enemy of the
city, with a large force in the Hellespont, is trying to snatch from you,
and which, if we once fall behind-hand, we shall no longer be able to
recover--these, surely, are matters upon which our interest demands that
our plans be formed and our preparations made with the utmost dispatch;
and that no clamour, no accusations about other matters, be allowed to
drive us from this point.

{4} Often as I am surprised at the assertions which are habitually made in
your presence, nothing, men of Athens, has surprised me more than the
remark which I heard only lately in the Council--that one who advises you
ought, forsooth, to advise you plainly either to go to war or to keep the
peace. {5} Very good.[3] If Philip is remaining inactive, if he is keeping
nothing that is ours, in violation of the Peace, if he is not organizing
all mankind against us, there is nothing more to be said--we have simply
to observe the Peace; and I see that, for your part, you are quite ready
to do so. But what if the oath that we swore, and the terms upon which we
made the Peace, stand inscribed for our eyes to see? {6} What if it is
proved that from the outset, before Diopeithes sailed from Athens with the
settlers who are now accused of having brought about the war, Philip
wrongfully seized many of our possessions--and here, unrepealed, are your
resolutions charging him with this--and that all along he has been
uninterruptedly seizing the possessions of the other Hellenic and foreign
peoples, and uniting their resources against us? What is _then_ the
meaning of the statement that we ought either to go to war or to keep the
Peace? {7} For we have no choice in the matter: nothing remains open to us
but the most righteous and most necessary of all acts--the act that they
deliberately refuse to consider--I mean the act of retaliation against the
aggressor: unless indeed, they intend to argue that, so long as Philip
keeps away from Attica and the Peiraeus, he does the city no wrong and is
not committing acts of war. {8} But if _this_ is their criterion of right
and wrong, if _this_ is their definition of peace, then, although what
they say is iniquitous, intolerable, and inconsistent with your security,
as all must see, at the same time these very statements are actually
contradictory of the charges which they are making against Diopeithes. {9}
Why, I beg to ask,[n] are we to give Philip full leave to act in whatever
way he chooses, so long as he does not touch Attica, when Diopeithes is
not to be allowed even to assist the Thracians, without being accused of
initiating war? But even if this inconsistency is brought home to them,
still, we are told, the conduct of the mercenaries in ravaging the
Hellespontine country is outrageous, and Diopeithes has no right to drive
the vessels to shore,[n] and ought to be stopped. {10} I grant it: let it
be done: I have nothing to say against it. Yet nevertheless, if their
advice is genuinely based on considerations of right, and right alone, I
consider that they are bound to prove that, as surely as they are seeking
to break up the force on which _Athens_ at present relies, by slandering
its commander to you when he tries to provide funds to support it, so
surely _Philip's_ force will be disbanded if you accept their advice. If
they fail to prove this, you must consider that they are simply setting
the city once more upon the same course which has already resulted in the
utter ruin of her fortunes. {11} For surely you know that nothing in the
world has contributed so much to Philip's successes, as his being always
first on the scene of action. With a standing force always about him, and
knowing beforehand what he intends to do, he suddenly falls upon
whomsoever he pleases: while we wait until we learn that something is
happening, and only then, in a turmoil, make our preparations. {12} It
follows, of course, that every position which he has attacked, he holds in
undisturbed possession; while we are all behindhand; all our expenditure
proves to have been so much useless waste; we have displayed our hostility
and our desire to check him; but we are too late for action, and so we add
disgrace to failure.

{13} You must therefore not fail to recognize, men of Athens, that now, as
before, all else that you hear consists of mere words and pretexts; and
that the real aim of all that is being done is to secure that you may
remain at home, that Athens may have no force outside the city, and that
thus Philip may give effect to all his desires without let or hindrance.
Consider, in the first place, what is actually occurring at the present
moment. {14} He is at present passing the time[n] in Thrace, with a great
army under him; and, as we are told by those who are on the spot,[n] he is
sending for a large addition to it from Macedonia and Thessaly. Now if he
waits for the Etesian winds,[n] and then goes to Byzantium and besieges
it, tell me first whether you think that the Byzantines will persist in
their present infatuation,[n] and will not call upon you and entreat you
to go to their aid? {15} I do not think so. Why, I believe that they would
open their gates to men whom they distrust even more than they distrust
you (if such exist), rather than surrender the city to Philip--supposing,
that is, that he does not capture them first. And then, if we are unable
to set sail from Athens, and if there are no forces there on the spot to
help them, nothing can prevent their destruction. {16} 'Of course,' you
say, 'for the men are possessed, and their infatuation passes all bounds.'
Very true; and yet they must be preserved; for the interests of Athens
require it. And besides, we cannot by any means be certain that he will
not invade the Chersonese. Indeed, if we are to judge by the letter which
he has sent to you, he there says that he _will_ punish the settlers[n] in
the Chersonese. {17} If then the army that is now formed there is in
existence, it will be able to help the Chersonese, and to injure some part
of Philip's country. But when once it is dissolved, what shall we do if he
marches against the Chersonese? 'We shall of course put Diopeithes on his
trial.' And how will that improve our position? 'Well, we should go to the
rescue from Athens ourselves.' What if the winds make it impossible? {18}
'But, of course, he will not really get there.' And who can guarantee
that? Do you realize, men of Athens, or take into account, what the coming
season of the year is, the season against which some think you ought to
evacuate the Hellespont and hand it over to Philip? What if, when he
leaves Thrace, he does not go near the Chersonese or Byzantium at all--for
this, too, is a possibility which you must consider--but comes to
Chalcis[n] or Megara, just as he lately came to Oreus? Is it better to
resist him here, and to allow the war to come into Attica, or to provide
something to keep him busy there? The latter course is surely the better.

{19} Realizing these things, therefore, as you all must, and taking due
account of them, you must not, Heaven knows, look askance at the force
which Diopeithes is trying to provide for Athens, or attempt to disband
it. You must yourselves prepare another force to support it: you must help
him freely with money, and give him in all other respects your loyal
co-operation. {20} If Philip were asked to say whether he would wish these
soldiers who are now with Diopeithes--describe them as you will, for I in
no way dispute your description--to be prosperous and in high favour with
the Athenians, and to be augmented in numbers by the co-operation of the
city; or whether he would rather see them broken up and destroyed in
consequence of calumnious charges against them; he would prefer, I
imagine, the latter alternative. Can it then be, that there are men among
us here who are trying to bring about the very thing that Philip would
pray Heaven for? And if so, do you need to seek any further for the cause
of the total ruin of the city's fortunes?

{21} I wish, therefore, to examine without reserve the present crisis of
our affairs, to inquire what we ourselves are now doing, and how we are
dealing with it. We do not wish to contribute funds, nor to serve with the
forces in person; we cannot keep our hands from the public revenues;[n] we
do not give the contributions of the allies[n] to Diopeithes, nor do we
approve of such supplies as he raises for himself; {22} but we look
malignantly at him, we ask whence he gets them, what he intends to do, and
every possible question of that kind: and yet we are still not willing to
confine ourselves to our own affairs, in consequence of the attitude which
we have adopted; we still praise with our lips those who uphold the
dignity of the city, though in our acts we are fighting on the side of
their opponents. {23} Now whenever any one rises to speak, you always put
to him the question 'What are we to do?' I wish to put to _you_ the
question, 'What are we to _say_?' For if you will neither contribute, nor
serve in person, nor leave the public funds alone, nor grant him the
contributions, nor let him get what he can for himself, nor yet confine
yourselves to your own affairs, I do not know what I can say. For when you
give such licence to those who desire to make charges and accusations,
that you listen to them even when they denounce him by anticipation for
his alleged intentions--well, what _can_ one say?

{24} The possible effect of this is a matter which some of you require to
understand, and I will speak without reserve; for indeed I could not speak
otherwise. All the commanders who have ever yet sailed from Athens--if I
am wrong, I consent to any penalty that you please[n]--take money from the
Chians, from the Erythraeans,[n] from any people from whom they can
severally get it--I mean, any of the Asiatic settlers who are now in
question. {25} Those who have one or two ships take less, those who have a
larger force take more. And those who give to them do not give either
little or much for nothing; they are not so insane: in fact, with these
sums they buy immunity from injury for the merchants who sail from their
ports, freedom from piracy, the convoying of their vessels, and so on.
They call the gifts 'benevolences',[n] and that is the name given to the
sums thus obtained. {26} And in the present case, when Diopeithes is there
with his army, it is obvious that all these peoples will give him money.
From what other source do you imagine that a general can maintain his
troops, when he has received nothing from you, and has no resources from
which he can pay his men? Will money drop from the sky? Of course not. He
subsists upon what he can collect or beg or borrow. {27} The real effect,
therefore, of the accusations made against him here, is simply to warn
every one that they should refuse to give him anything, since he is to pay
the penalty for his very intentions, not to speak of any action that he
may have taken or any success that he may have achieved. That is the only
meaning of the cry that 'he is preparing a blockade', or 'he is
surrendering[n] the Hellenes'. Do any of his critics care about the
Hellenes who live in Asia? {28} Were it so, they would be more thoughtful
for the rest of mankind than for their own country. And the proposal to
send another general to the Hellespont amounts to no more than this. For
if Diopeithes is acting outrageously and is driving the vessels to shore,
then, gentlemen, one little wax-tablet[n] is enough to put an end to it
all: and what the laws command is that for these offences we should
impeach the wrong-doers--not that we should keep a watch upon our own
forces at such expense and with so many ships.[n] {29} Such insanity
really passes all bounds. No! Against the enemy whom we cannot arrest and
render amenable to the laws, it is both right and necessary to maintain a
force, to send war-ships, and to contribute war-funds: but against one of
ourselves, a decree, an impeachment, a dispatch-boat[n] will answer our
purpose. These are the means which sensible men would use: the policy of
the other side is the policy of men whose spitefulness[n] is ruining your
fortunes. {30} And that there should be some such men, bad though it is,
is not the worst. No! for you who sit there are already in such a frame of
mind, that if any one comes forward and says that Diopeithes is the cause
of all the mischief, or Chares,[n] or Aristophon,[n] or any Athenian
citizen that he happens to name, you at once agree, and clamorously
declare that he is right; {31} but if any one comes forward and tells you
the truth, and says, 'Men of Athens, this is nonsense. It is Philip that
is the cause of all this mischief and trouble; for if he were quiet, the
city would have nothing to disturb her,' you cannot, indeed, deny the
truth of his words, but you seem, I think, to be annoyed, as though you
were losing something.[n] {32} And the cause of these things is this--and
I beseech you, in Heaven's name, to let me speak unreservedly, when I am
speaking for your true good--that some of your politicians have contrived
that you should be terrifying and severe in your assemblies, but easy-
going and contemptible in your preparations for war. And accordingly, if
any one names as the culprit some one whom you know you can arrest in your
own midst, you agree and you wish to act; but if one is named whom you
must first master by force of arms, if you are to punish him at all, you
are at a loss, I fancy, what to do, and you are vexed when this is brought
home to you. {33} For your politicians, men of Athens, should have treated
you in exactly the opposite way to this; they should train you to be kind
and sympathetic in your assemblies; for there it is with the members of
your own body and your own allies that your case is argued: but your
terrors and your severity should be displayed in your preparations for
war, where the struggle is with your enemies and your rivals. {34} As it
is, by their popular speeches, and by courting your favour to excess, they
have brought you into such a condition that, while in your assemblies you
give yourselves airs and enjoy their flattery, listening to nothing but
what is meant to please you, in the world of facts and events you are in
the last extremity of peril. Imagine, in God's name, what would happen, if
the Hellenes were to call you to account for the opportunities which, in
your indolence, you have now let pass, and were to put to you the
question, {35} 'Is it true, men of Athens, that you send envoys to us on
every possible occasion, to tell us of Philip's designs against ourselves
and all the Hellenes, and of the duty of keeping guard against the man,
and to warn us in every way?' We should have to confess that it was true.
We do act thus. 'Then,' they would proceed, 'is it true, you most
contemptible of all men, that though the man has been away for ten months,
{36} and has been cut off from every possibility of returning home, by
illness and by winter and by wars, you have neither liberated Euboea nor
recovered any of your own possessions? Is it true that you have remained
at home, unoccupied and healthy--if such a word can be used of men who
behave thus--and have seen him set up two tyrants in Euboea, one to serve
as a fortress directly menacing Attica, the other to watch Sciathus; {37}
and that you have not even rid yourselves of these dangers--granted that
you did not want to do anything more--but have let them be? Obviously you
have retired in his favour, and have made it evident that if he dies ten
times over, you will not make any move the more. Why trouble us then with
your embassies and your accusations?' If they speak thus to us, what will
be our answer? What shall we say, Athenians? I do not see what we can say.

{38} Now there are some who imagine that they confute a speaker, as soon
as they have asked him the question, 'What then are we to do?' I will
first give them this answer--the most just and true of all--'Do not do
what you are doing now.' {39} But at the same time I will give them a
minute and detailed reply; and then let them show that their willingness
to act upon it is not less than their eagerness to interrogate. First, men
of Athens, you must thoroughly make up your minds to the fact that Philip
is at war with Athens, and has broken the Peace--you must cease to lay the
blame at one another's doors--and that he is evilly-disposed and hostile
to the whole city, down to the very ground on which it is built; {40} nay,
I will go further--hostile to every single man in the city, even to those
who are most sure that they are winning his favour. (If you think
otherwise, consider the case of Euthycrates[n] and Lasthenes of Olynthus,
who fancied that they were on the most friendly terms with him, but, after
they had betrayed their city, suffered the most utter ruin of all.) But
his hostilities and intrigues are aimed at nothing so much as at our
constitution, whose overthrow is the very first object in the world to
him. {41} And in a sense it is natural that he should aim at this. For he
knows very well that even if he becomes master of all the rest of the
world, he can retain nothing securely, so long as you are a democracy; and
that if he chances to stumble anywhere, as may often happen to a man, all
the elements which are now forced into union with him will come and take
refuge with you. {42} For though you are not yourselves naturally adapted
for aggrandizement or the usurpation of empire, you have the art of
preventing any other from seizing power and of taking it from him when he
has it; and in every respect you are ready to give trouble to those who
are ambitious of dominion, and to lead all men forth into liberty. And so
he would not have Freedom, from her home in Athens, watching for every
opportunity he may offer--far from it--and there is nothing unsound or
careless in his reasoning. {43} The first essential point, therefore, is
this--that you conceive him to be the irreconcilable foe of your
constitution and of democracy: for unless you are inwardly convinced of
this, you will not be willing to take an active interest in the situation.
Secondly, you must realize clearly that all the plans which he is now so
busily contriving are in the nature of preparations against this country;
and wherever any one resists him, he there resists him on our behalf. {44}
For surely no one is so simple as to imagine that when Philip is covetous
of the wretched hamlets[n] of Thrace--one can give no other name to
Drongilum, Cabyle, Masteira, and the places which he is now seizing--and
when to get these places he is enduring heavy labours, hard winters, and
the extremity of danger;--{45} no one can imagine, I say, that the
harbours and the dockyards, and the ships of the Athenians, the produce of
your silver-mines, and your huge revenue, have no attraction for him, or
that he will leave you in possession of these, while he winters in the
very pit of destruction[n] for the sake of the millet and the spelt in the
silos[n] of Thrace. No, indeed! It is to get these into his power that he
pursues both his operations in Thrace and all his other designs. {46} What
then, as sensible men, must you do? Knowing and realizing your position,
as you do, you must lay aside this excessive, this irremediable[n]
indolence: you must contribute funds, and require them from your allies;
you must so provide and act, that this force which is now assembled may be
held together; in order that, as Philip has the force in readiness that is
to injure and enslave all the Hellenes, you may have in readiness that
which shall preserve and succour them. {47} You cannot effect by isolated
expeditions any of the things which must be effected. You must organize a
force, and provide maintenance for it, and paymasters, and a staff of
servants; and when you have taken such steps as will ensure the strictest
possible watch being kept over the funds, you must hold these officials
accountable for the money, and the general for the actual operations. If
you act thus, and honestly make up your minds to take this course, you
will either compel Philip to observe a righteous peace and remain in his
own land--and no greater blessing could you obtain than that--or you will
fight him on equal terms.

{48} It may be thought that this policy demands heavy expenditure, and
great exertions and trouble. That is true indeed; but let the objector
take into account what the consequences to the city must be, if he is
unwilling to assent to this policy, and he will find that the ready
performance of duty brings its reward. {49} If indeed some god is offering
us his guarantee--for no human guarantee would be sufficient in so great a
matter--that if you remain at peace and let everything slide, Philip will
not in the end come and attack yourselves; then, although, before God and
every Heavenly Power, it would be unworthy of you and of the position that
the city holds, and of the deeds of our forefathers, to abandon all the
rest of the Hellenes to slavery for the sake of our own ease--although,
for my part, I would rather have died than have suggested such a thing--
yet, if another proposes it and convinces you, let it be so: do not defend
yourselves: let everything go. {50} But if no one entertains such a
belief, if we all know that the very opposite is true, and that the wider
the mastery we allow him to gain, the more difficult and powerful a foe we
shall have to deal with, what further subterfuge is open to us? Why do we
delay? {51} When shall we ever be willing, men of Athens, to do our duty?
'When we are compelled,' you say. But the hour of compulsion, as the word
is applied to free men, is not only here already, but has long passed; and
we must surely pray that the compulsion which is put upon slaves may not
come upon us. And what is the difference? It is this--that for a free man
the greatest compelling force is his shame at the course which events are
taking--I do not know what greater we can imagine; but the slave is
compelled by blows and bodily tortures, which I pray may never fall to our
lot; it is not fit to speak of them.

{52} I would gladly tell you the whole story, and show how certain persons
are working for your ruin by their policy. I pass over, however, every
point but this. Whenever any question of our relations with Philip arises,
at once some one stands up and talks of the blessings of peace, of the
difficulty of maintaining a large force, and of designs on the part of
certain persons to plunder our funds; with other tales of the same kind,
which enable them to delay your action, and give Philip time to do what he
wishes unopposed. {53} What is the result? For you the result is your
leisure, and a respite from immediate action--advantages which I fear you
will some day feel to have cost you dear; and for them it is the favour
they win, and the wages for these services. But I am sure that there is no
need to persuade you to keep the Peace--you sit here fully persuaded. It
is the man who is committing acts of war that we need to persuade; for if
he is persuaded, you are ready enough. {54} Nor is it the expenditure
which is to ensure our preservation that ought to distress us, but the
fate which is in prospect for us, if we are not willing to take this
action: while the threatened 'plunder of our funds' is to be prevented by
the proposal of some safeguard which will render them secure, not by the
abandonment of our interests. {55} And even so, men of Athens, I feel
indignant at the very fact that some of you are so much pained at the
prospect of the plunder of our funds, when you have it in your power both
to protect them and to punish the culprits, and yet feel no pain when
Philip is seizing all Hellas piecemeal for his plunder, and seizing it to
strengthen himself against you. {56} What then is the reason, men of
Athens, that though Philip's campaigns, his aggressions, his seizure of
cities, are so unconcealed, none of my opponents has ever said that _he_
was bringing about war? Why is it those who advise you not to allow it,
not to make these sacrifices, that they accuse, and say that _they_ will
be the cause of the war? I will inform you. {57} It is because[n] they
wish to divert the anger which you are likely to show, if you suffer at
all from the war, on to the heads of those who are giving you the best
advice in your own interests. They want you to sit and try such persons,
instead of resisting Philip; and they themselves are to be the
prosecutors, instead of paying the penalty for their present actions. That
is the meaning of their assertion that there are some here, forsooth, who
want to bring about war. {58} That is the real point of these allegations
of responsibility. But this I know beyond all doubt--that without waiting
for any one in Athens to propose the declaration of war, Philip has not
only taken many other possessions of ours, but has just now sent an
expedition to Cardia. If, in spite of this, we wish to pretend that he is
not making war on us, he would be the most senseless man living, were he
to attempt to convince us of our error. {59} But what shall we say, when
his attack is made directly upon ourselves? He of course will say that he
is not at war with us--just as he was not at war with Oreus,[n] when his
soldiers were in the land; nor with the Pheraeans,[n] before that, when he
was assaulting their walls; nor with the Olynthians, first of all, until
he and his army were actually within their territory. Or shall we still
say that those who urge resistance are bringing about war? If so, all that
is left to us is slavery. If we may neither offer resistance, nor yet be
suffered to remain at peace, no other compromise[n] is possible. {60} And
further, the issues at stake are not for you merely what they are for
other states. What Philip desires is not your subjection, but your utter
annihilation. For he knows full well that you will never consent to be his
slaves, and that even if you were willing, you would not know the way,
accustomed as you are to govern; and he knows that you will be able to
give him more trouble, if you get the opportunity, than all the rest of
the world. {61} The struggle, then, is a struggle for existence; and as
such you ought to think of it: and you should show your abhorrence of
those who have sold themselves to Philip by beating them to death. For it
is impossible, utterly impossible, to master your enemies outside the
city, before you punish your enemies in the city itself. {62} Whence comes
it, think you, that he is insulting us now (for his conduct seems to me to
be nothing less than this), and that while he at least deceives all other
peoples by doing them favours, he is using threats against you without
more ado? For instance, he enticed the Thessalians by large gifts into
their present servitude; and words cannot describe how greatly he deceived
the Olynthians at first by the gift of Poteidaea and much beside. {63} At
this moment he is alluring the Thebans, by delivering up Boeotia to them,
and ridding them of a long and arduous campaign. Each of these peoples has
first reaped some advantage, before falling into those calamities which
some of them have already suffered, as all the world knows, and some are
destined to suffer whenever their time comes. But as for yourselves, to
pass over all that you have been robbed of at an earlier period,[n] what
deception, what robbery have been practised upon you in the very act of
making the Peace! {64} Have not the Phocians, and Thermopylae, and the
Thracian seaboard--Doriscus, Serrhium, Cersobleptes himself--been taken
from you? Does not Philip at this moment occupy the city of the Cardians,
and avow it openly? Why is it then, that he behaves as he does to all
others, and so differently to you? Because yours is the one city in the
world where men are permitted to speak on behalf of the enemy without
fear; because here a man may take bribes, and still address you with
impunity, even when you have been robbed of your own. In Olynthus it was
only safe to take Philip's side when the people of Olynthus as a whole had
shared Philip's favours, and was enjoying the possession of Poteidaea.
{65} In Thessaly it was only safe to take Philip's side when the
Thessalian commons had shared Philip's favours; for he had expelled the
tyrants for them, and restored to them their Amphictyonic position. In
Thebes it was not safe, until he had restored Boeotia to Thebes and
annihilated the Phocians. {66} But at Athens--though Philip has not only
robbed you of Amphipolis and the territory of the Cardians, but has turned
Euboea into a fortress overlooking your country, and is now on his way to
attack Byzantium--at Athens it _is_ safe to speak in Philip's interest.
Aye, and you know that, of such speakers, some who were poor are rapidly
growing rich; and some who were without name or fame are becoming famous
and distinguished, while you, on the other hand, are becoming inglorious
instead of famous, bankrupt instead of wealthy. For a city's wealth
consists, I imagine, in allies, confidence, loyalty--and of all these you
are bankrupt. {67} And because you are indifferent to these advantages,
and let them drift away from you, he has become prosperous and powerful,
and formidable to all, Hellenes and foreigners alike; while you are
deserted and humbled, with a splendid profusion of commodities in your
market, and a contemptible lack of all those things with which you should
have been provided. But I observe that certain speakers do not follow the
same principles in the advice which they give you, as they follow for
themselves. _You_, they tell you, ought to remain quiet, even when you are
wronged; but _they_ cannot remain quiet in your presence, even when no one
is wronging them.

{68} But now some one or other comes forward and says, 'Ah, but you will
not move a motion or take any risk. You are a poor-spirited coward.' Bold,
offensive, shameless, I am not, and I trust I may never be; and yet I
think I have more courage than very many of your dashing statesmen. {69}
For one, men of Athens, who overlooks all that the city's interest
demands--who prosecutes, confiscates, gives, accuses--does so not from any
bravery, but because in the popular character of his speeches and public
actions he has a guarantee of his personal safety, and therefore is bold
without risk. But one who in acting for the best sets himself in many ways
against your wishes--who never speaks to please, but always to advise what
is best; one who chooses a policy in which more issues must be decided by
chance than by calculation, and yet makes himself responsible to you for
both--that is the courageous man, {70} and such is the citizen who is of
value to his country, rather than those who, to gain an ephemeral
popularity, have ruined the supreme interests of the city. So far am I
from envying these men, or thinking them worthy citizens of their country,
that if any one were to ask me to say, what good _I_ had really done to
the city, although, men of Athens, I could tell how often I had been
trierarch and choregus,[n] how I had contributed funds, ransomed
prisoners, and done other like acts of generosity, I would mention none of
these things; {71} I would say only that my policy is not one of measures
like theirs--that although, like others, I could make accusations and
shower favours and confiscate property and do all that my opponents do, I
have never to this day set myself to do any of these things; I have been
influenced neither by gain nor by ambition; but I continue to give the
advice which sets me below many others in your estimation, but which must
make you greater, if you will listen to it; for so much, perhaps, I may
say without offence. {72} Nor, I think, should I be acting fairly as a
citizen, if I devised such political measures as would at once make me the
first man in Athens, and you the last of all peoples. As the measures of a
loyal politician develop, the greatness of his country should develop with
them; and it is the thing which is best, not the thing which is easiest,
that every speaker should advocate. Nature will find the way to the
easiest course unaided. To the best, the words and the guidance of the
loyal citizen must show the way.

{73} I have heard it remarked before now, that though what I _say_ is
always what is best, still I never contribute anything but words; whereas
the city needs work of some practical kind. I will tell you without any
concealment my own sentiments on this matter. There _is_ no work that can
be demanded of any of your public advisers, except that he should advise
what is best; and I think I can easily show you that this is so. {74} No
doubt you know how the great Timotheus[n] delivered a speech to the effect
that you ought to go to the rescue and save the Euboeans, when the Thebans
were trying to reduce them to servitude; and how, in the course of his
speech, he spoke somewhat in this strain:--'What?' said he, 'when you
actually have the Thebans in the island, do you debate what you are to do
with them, and how you are to act? Will you not cover the sea with
warships, men of Athens? Will you not rise from your seats and go
instantly to the Peiraeus and launch your vessels?' {75} So Timotheus
spoke, and you acted as he bade you; and through his speech and your
action the work was done. But if he had given you the best possible advice
(as in fact he did), and you had lapsed into indolence and paid no
attention to it, would the city have achieved any of the results which
followed on that occasion? Impossible! And so it is with all that I say
to-day, and with all that this or that speaker may say. For the actions
you must look to yourselves; from the speaker you must require that he
give you the best counsel that he can.[n]

{76} I desire now to sum up my advice and to leave the platform. I say
that we must contribute funds, and must keep together the force now in
existence, correcting anything that may seem amiss in it, but not
disbanding the whole force because of the possible criticisms against it.
We must send envoys everywhere to instruct, to warn, and to act. Above
all, we must punish those who take bribes in connexion with public
affairs, and must everywhere display our abhorrence of them; in order that
reasonable men, who offer their honest services, may find their policy
justified in their own eyes and in those of others. {77} If you treat the
situation thus, and cease to ignore it altogether, there is a chance--a
chance I say, even now--that it may improve. If, however, you sit idle,
with an interest that stops short at applause and acclamation, and retires
into the background when any action is required, I can imagine no oratory,
which, without action on your part, will be able to save your country.


[1] See Third Philippic Sec.Sec. 59 sqq.

[2] See Introduction to First Philippic.

[3] [Greek: est_o d_e.]


[_Introduction_. The Third Philippic seems to have been delivered in the
late spring or early summer of 341 B. C., about two months after the
Speech on the Chersonese, which apparently had little positive result,
though it probably prevented the recall and prosecution of Diopeithes. The
immediate occasion of the Third Philippic was a request from the forces in
the Chersonese for supplies. The general situation is the same as at the
date of the last speech, but the danger to Byzantium is more pressing.
Demosthenes now takes the broad ground of Panhellenic policy, and formally
proposes to send envoys throughout Greece, to unite all the Greek states
against Philip, as well as to send immediate reinforcements and supplies
to the Chersonese.

Many critics, ancient and modern, have regarded this as the greatest of
all Demosthenes' political orations. The lessons of history (from the
speaker's point of view) are repeated and enforced by the citation of
instance after instance. The tone of the speech, while less varied than
that of the last, is grave and intense. The passage (Sec.Sec. 36 ff.) in which
the orator contrasts the spirit of Athenian political life in the past
with that of his own day is one of the most impressive in all his works,
and the nobility of his appeal to the traditional ideals of Athenian
policy has been universally recognized even by his most severe critics.

The speech is found in the MSS. in two forms, of which the shorter omits a
number of passages[1] which the longer includes, though there are signs of
an imperfect blending of the two versions in certain places. It seems
probable that both versions are due to Demosthenes, and the speech may
have been more than once revised by him before publication or
republication. In which form it was delivered there is not sufficient
evidence to show.]

{1} Many speeches are made, men of Athens, at almost every meeting of the
Assembly, with reference to the aggressions which Philip has been
committing, ever since he concluded the Peace, not only against yourselves
but against all other peoples; and I am sure that all would agree, however
little they may act on their belief, that our aim, both in speech and in
action, should be to cause him to cease from his insolence and to pay the
penalty for it. And yet I see that in fact the treacherous sacrifice of
our interests has gone on, until what seems an ill-omened saying may, I
fear, be really true--that if all who came forward desired to propose, and
you desired to carry, the measures which would make your position as
pitiful as it could possibly be, it could not (so I believe), be made
worse than it is now. {2} It may be that there are many reasons for this,
and that our affairs did not reach their present condition from any one or
two causes. But if you examine the matter aright, you will find that the
chief responsibility rests with those whose aim is to win your favour, not
to propose what is best. Some of them, men of Athens, so long as they can
maintain the conditions which bring them reputation and influence, take no
thought for the future [and therefore think that you also should take
none]; while others, by accusing and slandering those who are actively at
work,[n] are simply trying to make the city spend its energies in
punishing the members of its own body, and so leave Philip free to say and
do what he likes. {3} Such political methods as these, familiar to you as
they are, are the real causes of the evil. And I beg you, men of Athens,
if I tell you certain truths outspokenly, to let no resentment on your
part fall upon me on this account. Consider the matter in this light. In
every other sphere of life, you believe that the right of free speech
ought to be so universally shared by all who are in the city, that you
have extended it both to foreigners and to slaves; and one may see many a
servant in Athens speaking his mind with greater liberty than is granted
to citizens in some other states: but from the sphere of political counsel
you have utterly banished this liberty. {4} The result[n] is that in your
meetings you give yourselves airs and enjoy their flattery, listening to
nothing but what is meant to please you, while in the world of facts and
events, you are in the last extremity of peril. If then you are still in
this mood to-day, I do not know what I can say; but if you are willing to
listen while I tell you, without flattery, what your interest requires, I
am prepared to speak. For though our position is very bad indeed, and much
has been sacrificed, it is still possible, even now, if you will do your
duty, to set all right once more. {5} It is a strange thing, perhaps, that
I am about to say, but it is true. The worst feature in the past is that
in which lies our best hope for the future. And what is this? It is that
you are in your present plight because you do not do any part of your
duty, small or great; for of course, if you were doing all that you should
do, and were still in this evil case, you could not even hope for any
improvement. As it is, Philip has conquered your indolence and your
indifference; but he has not conquered Athens. You have not been
vanquished--you have never even stirred. {6} [Now if it was admitted by us
all that Philip was at war with Athens, and was transgressing the Peace, a
speaker would have to do nothing but to advise you as to the safest and
easiest method of resistance to him. But since there are some who are in
so extraordinary a frame of mind that, though he is capturing cities,
though many of your possessions are in his hands, and though he is
committing aggressions against all men, they still tolerate certain
speakers, who constantly assert at your meetings that it is some of _us_
who are provoking the war, it is necessary to be on our guard and come to
a right understanding on the matter. {7} For there is a danger lest any
one who proposes or advises resistance should find himself accused of
having brought about the war.]

[Well, I say this first of all, and lay it down as a principle, that if it
is open to us to deliberate whether we should remain at peace or should go
to war ...]

{8} Now if it is possible for the city to remain at peace--if the decision
rests with us (that I may make this my starting-point)--then, I say that
we ought to do so, and I call upon any one who says that it is so to move
his motion, and to act and not to defraud us.[n] But if another with
weapons in his hands and a large force about him holds out to you the
_name_ of peace, while his own acts are acts of war, what course remains
open to us but that of resistance? though if you wish to profess peace in
the same manner as he, I have no quarrel with you. {9} But if any man's
conception of peace is that it is a state in which Philip can master all
that intervenes till at last he comes to attack ourselves, such a
conception, in the first place, is madness; and, in the second place, this
peace that he speaks of is a peace which you are to observe towards
Philip, while he does not observe it towards you: and this it is--this
power to carry on war against you, without being met by any hostilities on
your part--that Philip is purchasing with all the money that he is

{10} Indeed, if we intend to wait till the time comes when he admits that
he is at war with us, we are surely the most innocent persons in the
world. Why, even if he comes to Attica itself, to the very Peiraeus, he
will never make such an admission, if we are to judge by his dealings with
others. {11} For, to take one instance, he told the Olynthians, when he
was five miles from the city, that there were only two alternatives--
either they must cease to live in Olynthus, or he to live in Macedonia:
but during the whole time before that, whenever any one accused him of any
such sentiments, he was indignant and sent envoys to answer the charge.
Again, he marched into the Phocians' country, as though visiting his
allies:[n] it was by Phocian envoys that he was escorted on the march; and
most people in Athens contended strongly that his crossing the Pass would
bring no good to Thebes. {12} Worse still, he has lately seized Pherae[n]
and still holds it, though he went to Thessaly as a friend and an ally.
And, latest of all, he told those unhappy citizens of Oreus[n] that he had
sent his soldiers to visit them and to make kind inquiries; he had heard
that they were sick, and suffering from faction, and it was right for an
ally and a true friend to be present at such a time. {13} Now if, instead
of giving them warning and using open force, he deliberately chose to
deceive these men, who could have done him no harm, though they might have
taken precautions against suffering any themselves, do you imagine that he
will make a formal declaration of war upon you before he commences
hostilities, and that, so long as you are content to be deceived? {14}
Impossible! For so long as you, though you are the injured party, make no
complaint against him, but accuse some of your own body, he would be the
most fatuous man on earth if _he_ were to interrupt your strife and
contentions with one another--to bid you turn upon himself, and so to cut
away the ground from the arguments by which his hirelings put you off,
when they tell you that _he_ is not at war with Athens.

{15} In God's name, is there a man in his senses who would judge by words,
and not by facts, whether another was at peace or at war with him? Of
course there is not. Why, from the very first, when the Peace had only
just been made, before those who are now in the Chersonese had been sent
out, Philip was taking Serrhium[n] and Doriscus, and expelling the
soldiers who were in the castle of Serrhium and the Sacred Mountain, where
they had been placed by your general. {16} But what was he doing, in
acting thus? For he had sworn to a Peace.[n] And let no one ask, 'What do
these things amount to? What do they matter to Athens?' For whether these
acts were trifles which could have no interest for you is another matter;
but the principles of religion[n] and justice, whether a man transgress
them in small things or great, have always the same force. What? When he
is sending mercenaries into the Chersonese, which the king and all the
Hellenes have acknowledged to be yours; when he openly avows that he is
going to the rescue, and states it in his letter, what is it that he is
doing? {17} He tells you, indeed, that he is not making war upon you. But
so far am I from admitting that one who acts in this manner is observing
the Peace which he made with you, that I hold that in grasping at Megara,
in setting up tyrants in Euboea, in advancing against Thrace at the
present moment, in pursuing his machinations in the Peloponnese, and in
carrying out his entire policy with the help of his army, he is violating
the Peace and is making war against you;--unless you mean to say that even
to bring up engines to besiege you is no breach of the Peace, until they
are actually planted against your walls. But you will not say this; for
the man who is taking the steps and contriving the means which will lead
to my capture is at war with me, even though he has not yet thrown a
missile or shot an arrow. {18} Now what are the things which would imperil
your safety, if anything should happen?[n] The alienation of the
Hellespont, the placing of Megara and Euboea in the power of the enemy,
and the attraction of Peloponnesian sympathy to his cause. Can I then say
that one who is erecting such engines of war as these against the city is
at peace with you? {19} Far from it! For from the very day when he
annihilated the Phocians--from that very day, I say, I date the beginning
of his hostilities against you. And for your part, I think that you will
be wise if you resist him at once; but that if you let him be, you will
find that, when you wish to resist, resistance itself is impossible.
Indeed, so widely do I differ, men of Athens, from all your other
advisers, that I do not think there is any room for discussion to-day in
regard to the Chersonese or Byzantium. {20} We _must_ go to their defence,
and take every care that they do not suffer [and we must send all that
they need to the soldiers who are at present there]. But we _have_ to take
counsel for the good of all the Hellenes, in view of the grave peril in
which they stand. And I wish to tell you on what grounds I am so alarmed
at the situation, in order that if my reasoning is correct, you may share
my conclusions, and exercise some forethought for yourselves at least, if
you are actually unwilling to do so for the Hellenes as a whole; but that
if you think that I am talking nonsense, and am out of my senses, you may
both now and hereafter decline to attend to me as though I were a sane

{21} The rise of Philip to greatness from such small and humble
beginnings; the mistrustful and quarrelsome attitude of the Hellenes
towards one another; the fact that his growth out of what he was into what
he is was a far more extraordinary thing than would be his subjugation of
all that remains, when he has already secured so much;--all this and all
similar themes, upon which I might speak at length, I will pass over. {22}
But I see that all men, beginning with yourselves, have conceded to him
the very thing which has been at issue in every Hellenic war during the
whole of the past. And what is this? It is the right to act as he pleases
--to mutilate and to strip the Hellenic peoples, one by one, to attack and
to enslave their cities. {23} For seventy-three years[n] you were the
leading people of Hellas, and the Spartans for thirty years save one;[n]
and in these last times, after the battle of Leuctra,[n] the Thebans too
acquired some power: yet neither to you nor to Thebes nor to Sparta was
such a right ever conceded by the Hellenes, as the right to do whatever
you pleased. Far from it! {24} First of all it was your own behaviour--or
rather that of the Athenians of that day--which some thought immoderate;
and all, even those who had no grievance against Athens, felt bound to
join the injured parties, and to make war upon you. Then, in their turn,
the Spartans, when they had acquired an empire and succeeded to a
supremacy like your own, attempted to go beyond all bounds and to disturb
the established order[n] to an unjustifiable extent; and once more, all,
even those who had no grievance against them, had recourse to war. {25}
Why mention the others? For we ourselves and the Spartans, though we could
originally allege no injury done by the one people to the other,
nevertheless felt bound to go to war on account of the wrongs which we saw
the rest suffering. And yet all the offences of the Spartans in those
thirty years of power, and of your ancestors in their seventy years, were
less, men of Athens, than the wrongs inflicted upon the Greeks by Philip,
in the thirteen years, not yet completed, during which he has been to the
fore. Less do I say? {26} They are not a fraction of them. [A few words
will easily prove this.] I say nothing of Olynthus, and Methone, and
Apollonia, and thirty-two cities in the Thracian region,[n] all
annihilated by him with such savagery, that a visitor to the spot would
find it difficult to tell that they had ever been inhabited. I remain
silent in regard to the extirpation of the great Phocian race. But what is
the condition of Thessaly? Has he not robbed their very cities of their
governments,[n] and set up tetrarchies, that they may be enslaved, not
merely by whole cities, but by whole tribes at a time? {27} Are not the
cities of Euboea even now ruled by tyrants, and that in an island that is
neighbour to Thebes and Athens? Does he not write expressly in his
letters, 'I am at peace with those who choose to obey me'? And what he
thus writes he does not fail to act upon; for he is gone to invade the
Hellespont; he previously went to attack Ambracia;[n] the great city of
Elis[n] in the Peloponnese is his; he has recently intrigued against
Megara;[n] and neither Hellas nor the world beyond it is large enough to
contain the man's ambition. {28} But though all of us, the Hellenes, see
and hear these things, we send no representatives to one another to
discuss the matter; we show no indignation; we are in so evil a mood, so
deep have the lines been dug which sever city from city, that up to this
very day we are unable to act as either our interest or our duty require.
{29} We cannot unite; we can form no combination for mutual support or
friendship; but we look on while the man grows greater, because every one
has made up his mind (as it seems to me) to profit by the time during
which his neighbour is being ruined, and no one cares or acts for the
safety of the Hellenes. For we all know that Philip is like the recurrence
or the attack of a fever or other illness, in his descent upon those who
fancy themselves for the present well out of his reach. {30} And further,
you must surely realize that all the wrongs that the Hellenes suffered
from the Spartans or ourselves they at least suffered at the hands of
true-born sons of Hellas; and (one might conceive) it was as though a
lawful son, born to a great estate, managed his affairs in some wrong or
improper way;--his conduct would in itself deserve blame and denunciation,
but at least it could not be said that he was not one of the family, or
was not the heir to the property. {31} But had it been a slave or a
supposititious son that was thus ruining and spoiling an inheritance to
which he had no title, why, good Heavens! how infinitely more scandalous
and reprehensible all would have declared it to be. And yet they show no
such feeling in regard to Philip, although not only is he no Hellene, not
only has he no kinship with Hellenes, but he is not even a barbarian from
a country that one could acknowledge with credit;--he is a pestilent
Macedonian, from whose country it used not to be possible to buy even a
slave of any value.

{32} And in spite of this, is there any degree of insolence to which he
does not proceed? Not content with annihilating cities, does he not manage
the Pythian games,[n] the common meeting of the Hellenes, and send his
slaves to preside over the competition in his absence? [Is he not master
of Thermopylae, and of the passes which lead into Hellenic territory? Does
he not hold that district with garrisons and mercenaries? Has he not taken
the precedence in consulting the oracle, and thrust aside ourselves and
the Thessalians and Dorians and the rest of the Amphictyons, though the
right is not one which is given even to all of the Hellenes?] {33} Does he
not write to the Thessalians to prescribe the constitution under which
they are to live? Does he not send one body of mercenaries to Porthmus, to
expel the popular party of Eretria, and another to Oreus, to set up
Philistides as tyrant? And yet the Hellenes see these things and endure
them, gazing (it seems to me) as they would gaze at a hailstorm--each
people praying that it may not come their way, but no one trying to
prevent it. Nor is it only his outrages upon Hellas that go unresisted.
{34} No one resists even the aggressions which are committed against
himself. Ambracia and Leucas belong to the Corinthians--he has attacked
them: Naupactus to the Achaeans--he has sworn to hand it over to the
Aetolians: Echinus[n] to the Thebans--he has taken it from them, and is
now marching against their allies the Byzantines--is it not so? {35} And
of our own possessions, to pass by all the rest, is not Cardia, the
greatest city in the Chersonese, in his hands? Thus are we treated; and we
are all hesitating and torpid, with our eyes upon our neighbours,
distrusting one another, rather than the man whose victims we all are. But
if he treats us collectively in this outrageous fashion, what do you think
he will do, when he has become master of each of us separately?

{36} What then is the cause of these things? For as it was not without
reason and just cause that the Hellenes in old days were so prompt for
freedom, so it is not without reason or cause that they are now so prompt
to be slaves. There was a spirit, men of Athens, a spirit in the minds of
the people in those days, which is absent to-day--the spirit which
vanquished the wealth of Persia, which led Hellas in the path of freedom,
and never gave way in face of battle by sea or by land; a spirit whose
extinction to-day has brought universal ruin and turned Hellas upside
down. What was this spirit? [It was nothing subtle nor clever.] {37} It
meant that men who took money from those who aimed at dominion or at the
ruin of Hellas were execrated by all; that it was then a very grave thing
to be convicted of bribery; that the punishment for the guilty man was the
heaviest that could be inflicted; that for him there could be no plea for
mercy, nor hope of pardon. {38} No orator, no general, would then sell the
critical opportunity whenever it arose--the opportunity so often offered
to men by fortune, even when they are careless and their foes are on their
guard. They did not barter away the harmony between people and people, nor
their own mistrust of the tyrant and the foreigner, nor any of these high
sentiments. {39} Where are such sentiments now? They have been sold in the
market and are gone; and those have been imported in their stead, through
which the nation lies ruined and plague-stricken--the envy of the man who
has received his hire; the amusement which accompanies his avowal; [the
pardon granted to those whose guilt is proved;] the hatred of one who
censures the crime; and all the appurtenances of corruption. {40} For as
to ships, numerical strength, unstinting abundance of funds and all other
material of war, and all the things by which the strength of cities is
estimated, every people can command these in greater plenty and on a
larger scale by far than in old days. But all these resources are rendered
unserviceable, ineffectual, unprofitable, by those who traffic in them.

{41} That these things are so to-day, you doubtless see, and need no
testimony of mine: and that in times gone by the opposite was true, I will
prove to you, not by any words of my own, but by the record inscribed by
your ancestors on a pillar of bronze, and placed on the Acropolis [not to
be a lesson to themselves--they needed no such record to put them in a
right mind--but to be a reminder and an example to you of the zeal that
you ought to display in such a cause]. {42} What then is the record?
'Arthmius,[n] son of Pythonax, of Zeleia, is an outlaw, and is the enemy
of the Athenian people and their allies, he and his house.' Then follows
the reason for which this step was taken--'because he brought the gold
from the Medes into the Peloponnese.' {43} Such is the record. Consider,
in Heaven's name, what must have been the mind of the Athenians of that
day, when they did this, and their conception of their position. They set
up a record, that because a man of Zeleia, Arthmius by name, a slave of
the King of Persia (for Zeleia is in Asia), as part of his service to the
king, had brought gold, not to Athens, but to the Peloponnese, he should
be an enemy of Athens and her allies, he and his house, and that they
should be outlaws. {44} And this outlawry is no such disfranchisement as
we ordinarily mean by the word. For what would it matter to a man of
Zeleia, that he might have no share in the public life of Athens? But
there is a clause in the Law of Murder, dealing with those in connexion
with whose death the law does not allow a prosecution for murder [but the
slaying of them is to be a holy act]: 'And let him die an outlaw,' it
runs. The meaning, accordingly, is this--that the slayer of such a man is
to be pure from all guilt. {45} They thought, therefore, that the safety
of all the Hellenes was a matter which concerned themselves--apart from
this belief, it could not have mattered to them whether any one bought or
corrupted men in the Peloponnese; and whenever they detected such
offenders, they carried their punishment and their vengeance so far as to
pillory their names for ever. As the natural consequence, the Hellenes
were a terror to the foreigner, not the foreigner to the Hellenes. It is
not so now. Such is not your attitude in these or in other matters. {46}
But what is it? [You know it yourselves; for why should I accuse you
explicitly on every point? And that of the rest of the Hellenes is like
your own, and no better; and so I say that the present situation demands
our utmost earnestness and good counsel.[n]] And what counsel? Do you bid
me tell you, and will you not be angry if I do so?

[_He reads from the document_.]

{47} Now there is an ingenuous argument, which is used by those who would
reassure the city, to the effect that, after all, Philip is not yet in the
position once held by the Spartans, who ruled everywhere over sea and
land, with the king for their ally, and nothing to withstand them; and
that, none the less, Athens defended herself even against them, and was
not swept away. Since that time the progress in every direction, one may
say, has been great, and has made the world to-day very different from
what it was then; but I believe that in no respect has there been greater
progress or development than in the art of war. {48} In the first place, I
am told that in those days the Spartans and all our other enemies would
invade us for four or five months--during, that is, the actual summer--and
would damage Attica with infantry and citizen-troops, and then return home
again. And so old-fashioned were the men of that day--nay rather, such
true citizens--that no one ever purchased any object from another for
money, but their warfare was of a legitimate and open kind. {49} But now,
as I am sure you see, most of our losses are the result of treachery, and
no issue is decided by open conflict or battle; while you are told that it
is not because he leads a column of heavy infantry[n] that Philip can
march wherever he chooses, but because he has attached to himself a force
of light infantry, cavalry, archers, mercenaries, and similar troops. {50}
And whenever, with such advantages,[n] he falls upon a State which is
disordered within, and in their distrust of one another no one goes out in
defence of its territory, he brings up his engines and besieges them. I
pass over the fact that summer and winter are alike to him--that there is
no close season during which he suspends operations. {51} But if you all
know these things and take due account of them, you surely must not let
the war pass into Attica, nor be dashed from your seat through looking
back to the simplicity of those old hostilities with Sparta. You must
guard against him, at the greatest possible distance, both by political
measures and by preparations; you must prevent his stirring from home,
instead of grappling with him at close quarters in a struggle to the
death. {52} For, men of Athens, we have many natural advantages for a
war,[n] if we are willing to do our duty. There is the character of his
country, much of which we can harry and damage, and a thousand other
things. But for a pitched battle he is in better training than we.

{53} Nor have you only to recognize these facts, and to resist him by
actual operations of war. You must also by reasoned judgement and of set
purpose come to execrate those who address you in his interest,
remembering that it is impossible to master the enemies of the city, until
you punish those who are serving them in the city itself. {54} And this,
before God and every Heavenly Power--this you will not be able to do; for
you have reached such a pitch of folly or distraction or--I know not what
to call it; for often has the fear actually entered my mind, that some
more than mortal power may be driving our fortunes to ruin--that to enjoy
their abuse, or their malice, or their jests, or whatever your motive may
chance to be, you call upon men to speak who are hirelings, and some of
whom would not even deny it; and you laugh to hear their abuse of others.
{55} And terrible as this is, there is yet worse to be told. For you have
actually made political life safer for these men, than for those who
uphold your own cause. And yet observe what calamities the willingness to
listen to such men lays up in store. I will mention facts known to you

{56} In Olynthus, among those who were engaged in public affairs, there
was one party who were on the side of Philip, and served his interests in
everything; and another whose aim was their city's real good, and the
preservation of their fellow citizens from bondage. Which were the
destroyers of their country? which betrayed the cavalry, through whose
betrayal Olynthus perished? Those whose sympathies were with Philip's
cause; those who, while the city still existed brought such dishonest and
slanderous charges against the speakers whose advice was for the best,
that, in the case of Apollonides at least, the people of Olynthus was even
induced to banish the accused.

{57} Nor is this instance of the unmixed evil wrought by these practices
in the case of the Olynthians an exceptional one, or without parallel
elsewhere. For in Eretria,[n] when Plutarchus and the mercenaries had been
got rid of, and the people had control of the city and of Porthmus, one
party wished to entrust the State to you, the other to entrust it to
Philip. And through listening mainly, or rather entirely, to the latter,
these poor luckless Eretrians were at last persuaded to banish the
advocates of their own interests. {58} For, as you know, Philip, their
ally, sent Hipponicus with a thousand mercenaries, stripped Porthmus of
its walls, and set up three tyrants--Hipparchus, Automedon, and
Cleitarchus; and since then he has already twice expelled them from the
country when they wished to recover their position [sending on the first
occasion the mercenaries commanded by Eurylochus, on the second, those
under Parmenio].

{59} And why go through the mass of the instances? Enough to mention how
in Oreus Philip had, as his agents, Philistides, Menippus, Socrates,
Thoas, and Agapaeus--the very men who are now in possession of the city--
and every one knew the fact; while a certain Euphraeus,[n] who once lived
here in Athens, acted in the interests of freedom, to save his country
from bondage. {60} To describe the insults and the contumely with which he
met would require a long story; but a year before the capture of the town
he laid an information of treason against Philistides and his party,
having perceived the nature of their plans. A number of men joined forces,
with Philip for their paymaster and director, and haled Euphraeus off to
prison as a disturber of the peace. {61} Seeing this, the democratic party
in Oreus, instead of coming to the rescue of Euphraeus, and beating the
other party to death, displayed no anger at all against them, and agreed
with a malicious pleasure that Euphraeus deserved his fate. After this the
conspirators worked with all the freedom they desired for the capture of
the city, and made arrangements for the execution of the scheme; while any
of the democratic party, who perceived what was going on, maintained a
panic-stricken silence, remembering the fate of Euphraeus. So wretched was
their condition, that though this dreadful calamity was confronting them,
no one dared open his lips, until all was ready and the enemy was
advancing up to the walls. Then the one party set about the defence, the
other about the betrayal of the city. {62} And when the city had been
captured in this base and shameful manner, the successful party governed
despotically: and of those who had been their own protectors, and had been
ready to treat Euphraeus with all possible harshness, they expelled some
and murdered others; while the good Euphraeus killed himself, thus
testifying to the righteousness and purity of his motives in opposing
Philip on behalf of his countrymen.

{63} Now for what reason, you may be wondering, were the peoples of
Olynthus and Eretria and Oreus more agreeably disposed towards Philip's
advocates than towards their own? The reason was the same as it is with
you--that those who speak for your true good can never, even if they
would, speak to win popularity with you; they are constrained to inquire
how the State may be saved: while their opponents, in the very act of
seeking popularity, are co-operating with Philip. {64} The one party said,
'You must pay taxes;' the other, 'There is no need to do so.' The one
said, 'Go to war, and do not trust him;' the other, 'Remain at peace,'--
until they were in the toils. And--not to mention each separately--I
believe that the same thing was true of all. The one side said what would
enable them to win favour; the other, what would secure the safety of
their State. And at last the main body of the people accepted much that
they proposed--not now from any such desire for gratification, nor from
ignorance, but as a concession to circumstances, thinking that their cause
was now wholly lost. {65} It is this fate, I solemnly assure you, that I
dread for you, when the time comes that you make your reckoning, and
realize that there is no longer anything that can be done. May you never
find yourselves, men of Athens, in such a position! Yet in any case, it
were better to die ten thousand deaths, than to do anything out of
servility towards Philip [or to sacrifice any of those who speak for your
good]. A noble recompense did the people in Oreus receive, for entrusting
themselves to Philip's friends, and thrusting Euphraeus aside! {66} and a
noble recompense the democracy of Eretria, for driving away your envoys,
and surrendering to Cleitarchus! They are slaves, scourged and butchered!
A noble clemency did he show to the Olynthians, who elected Lasthenes to
command the cavalry, and banished Apollonides! {67} It is folly, and it is
cowardice, to cherish hopes like these, to give way to evil counsels, to
refuse to do anything that you should do, to listen to the advocates of
the enemy's cause, and to fancy that you dwell in so great a city that,
whatever happens, you will not suffer any harm. {68} Aye, and it is
shameful to exclaim after the event, 'Why, who would have expected this?
Of course, we ought to have done, or not to have done, such and such
things!' The Olynthians could tell you of many things, to have foreseen
which in time would have saved them from destruction. So too could the
people of Oreus, and the Phocians, and every other people that has been
destroyed. {69} But how does that help them now? So long as the vessel is
safe, be it great or small, so long must the sailor and the pilot and
every man in his place exert himself and take care that no one may capsize
it by design or by accident: but when the seas have overwhelmed it, all
their efforts are in vain. {70} So it is, men of Athens, with us. While we
are still safe, with our great city, our vast resources, our noble name,
what are we to do? Perhaps some one sitting here has long been wishing to
ask this question. Aye, and I will answer it, and will move my motion; and
you shall carry it, if you wish. We ourselves, in the first place, must
conduct the resistance and make preparation for it--with ships, that is,
and money, and soldiers. For though all but ourselves give way and become
slaves, we at least must contend for freedom. {71} And when we have made
all these preparations ourselves, and let them be seen, then let us call
upon the other states for aid, and send envoys to carry our message [in
all directions--to the Peloponnese, to Rhodes, to Chios, to the king; for
it is not unimportant for his interests either that Philip should be
prevented from subjugating the world]; that so, if you persuade them, you
may have partners to share the danger and the expense, in case of need;
and if you do not, you may at least delay the march of events. {72} For
since the war is with a single man, and not against the strength of a
united state, even delay is not without its value, any more than were
those embassies[n] of protest which last year went round the Peloponnese,
when I and Polyeuctus, that best of men, and Hegesippus and the other
envoys went on our tour, and forced him to halt, so that he neither went
to attack Acarnania, nor set out for the Peloponnese. {73} But I do not
mean that we should call upon the other states, if we are not willing to
take any of the necessary steps ourselves. It is folly to sacrifice what
is our own, and then pretend to be anxious for the interests of others--to
neglect the present, and alarm others in regard to the future. I do not
propose this. I say that we must send money to the forces in the
Chersonese, and do all that they ask of us; that we must make preparation
ourselves, while we summon, convene, instruct, and warn the rest of the
Hellenes. That is the policy for a city with a reputation such as yours.
{74} But if you fancy that the people of Chalcis or of Megara will save
Hellas, while you run away from the task, you are mistaken. They may well
be content if they can each save themselves. The task is yours. It is the
prerogative that your forefathers won, and through many a great peril
bequeathed to you. {75} But if each of you is to sit and consult his
inclinations, looking for some way by which he may escape any personal
action, the first consequence will be that you will never find any one who
will act; and the second, I fear, that the day will come when we shall be
forced to do, at one and the same time, all the things we wish to avoid.

{76} This then is my proposal, and this I move. If the proposal is carried
out, I think that even now the state of our affairs may be remedied. But
if any one has a better proposal to make, let him make it, and give us his
advice. And I pray to all the gods that whatever be the decision that you
are about to make, it may be for your good.


[1] These are printed in square brackets in the translation.


[_Introduction_. The advice given by Demosthenes in the Third Philippic
(spoken before the middle of 341) was in the main followed. He himself was
sent almost immediately to Byzantium, where he renewed the alliance
between that city and Athens, and at the same time entered into relations
with Abydos and the Thracian princes. Rhodes, and probably Chios and Cos,
were also conciliated, and an embassy was sent to the King of Persia to
ask for aid against Philip. The king appears to have sent assistance to
Diopeithes, and it is also stated (not on the best authority) that he sent
large sums of money to Demosthenes and Hypereides. Demosthenes further
succeeded, in conjunction with Callias of Chalcis, in organizing a league
against Philip, which included Corinth, Megara, Corcyra, and the
Acarnanians, and which at least supplied a considerable number of men and
some funds. The cities of Euboea, most of which had been in the hands of
Philip's party, were also formed into a confederacy, in alliance with
Athens, under the leadership of Chalcis; Philistides was expelled from
Oreus, about July 341, by the allied forces under Cephisophon; and later
in the summer, Phocion drove Cleitarchus from Eretria. On the motion of
Aristonicus, the Athenians voted Demosthenes a golden crown, which was
conferred on him in the theatre at the Great Dionysia in March 340. The
arrest of Anaxinus of Oreus, and his condemnation as a spy, acting in
Philip's interest, must have occurred about the same time. Not long
afterwards Demosthenes succeeded in carrying out a complete reorganization
of the trierarchic system, by which he made the burden of the expense vary
strictly according to property, and secured a regular and efficient supply
of ships, money, and men.

In the meantime (in 341 or 340) the island of Peparethus was attacked by
Philip's ships, in revenge for the seizure of the Macedonian garrison in
Halonnesus by the Peparethians: and the Athenian admirals were ordered to
retaliate. Philip himself had been pursuing his course in Thrace; and on
the rejection of his request to Byzantium for an alliance, he laid siege
(late in 340) to Perinthus (which lay on his way to Byzantium), sending
part of his forces through the Chersonese. Aided by Byzantine and Persian
soldiers, Perinthus held out, till at last Philip took off most of his
forces and besieged Byzantium itself. He had shortly before this sent to
Athens an express declaration of war, and received a similar declaration
from her, the formal excuse for which was found in the recent seizure by
his ships of some Athenian merchant-vessels. But with help from Athens,
Chios, Rhodes, and Cos, the Byzantines maintained the defence. Philip's
position became serious; but he managed by a ruse to get his ships away
into the open sea, and even to do some damage to the Athenian settlers in
the Chersonese. In the winter he withdrew from Byzantium, and in 339 made
an incursion into Scythia; but, returning through the country of the
Triballi, he sustained some loss, and was severely wounded. Later in the
year a new Sacred War which had arisen gave him a convenient opportunity
for the invasion of Greece.

At the meeting of the Amphictyonic Council in the autumn of 340,[1]
Aeschines was one of the representatives of Athens. The Athenians had
recently offended Thebes by re-gilding and dedicating in the restored
temple at Delphi fifty shields, with an inscription stating that they were
spoil 'taken from the Medes and the Thebans, when they fought against the
Hellenes' (probably at Plataeae in 479). The Locrians of Amphissa intended
(according to Aeschines' account) to propose that the Council should fine
Athens fifty talents. Aeschines rose to state the case for Athens; but a
delegate from Amphissa forbade all mention of the Athenians, and demanded
their exclusion from the temple, on the ground of their alliance with the
accursed Phocians. Aeschines retorted by charging the Amphisseans with
cultivating and building upon the sacred plain of Cirrha--acts forbidden
for all time in 586 B.C.--and roused the Council to such indignation that
they gathered a body of men and destroyed the harbour and the unlawful
buildings of Cirrha; but they were severely handled by the Amphisseans,
and the Council now voted that the Amphictyonic states should send
representatives, to discuss the question of war against Amphissa, to a
meeting to be held at Thermopylae before the spring meeting of the
Council. To this preliminary meeting, the Athenians (though inclined to
view Aeschines' performance with favour), on the advice of Demosthenes,
sent no representatives; nor did the Thebans (the allies of Amphissa). War
was declared by the Amphictyons against Amphissa; but Cottyphus, the
Thessalian, who had been appointed general, made little headway, and (at
the spring or the autumn meeting of the Council) declared that the
Amphictyonic states must either send men and money, or else make Philip
their general. Philip was, of course, at once appointed; but instead of
proceeding against Amphissa, marched to Elateia and fortified it. This
caused the greatest alarm at Athens. Demosthenes was immediately
dispatched to Thebes, where he succeeded, by what appear to have been
liberal and judicious proposals, in making an alliance between Thebes and
Athens, in spite of the attempts of Philip's envoys to counteract his
influence. Euboea, Megara, Corinth, and other members of the league also
sent help. Philip himself called upon his own friends in the Peloponnese
for aid, and at last moved towards Amphissa. Demosthenes seems now to have
succeeded in applying the festival-money to purposes of war, and with the
aid of Lycurgus, who became Controller of the Festival Fund, to have
amassed a large sum for the use of the State. At the Dionysia of 338 he
was again crowned, on the proposal of Demomeles and Hypereides. The allies
at first won some successes and refortified some of the Phocian towns, but
afterwards unfortunately divided their forces, and so enabled Philip to
defeat the two divisions separately, and to destroy Amphissa. Philip's
proposals of peace found supporters both in Thebes and in Athens, but were
counteracted by Demosthenes. Late in the summer of 338, the decisive
battle was fought at Chaeroneia, and resulted in the total rout of the
allies. Demosthenes himself was one of the fugitives. Philip placed a
Macedonian garrison in Thebes, restored his exiled friends to power there,
established a Council of Three Hundred, and (through them) put to death or
banished his enemies. He also gave Orchomenus, Thespiae, and Plataeae
their independence. After a moment of panic, the Athenians, led by
Demosthenes, Lycurgus, and Hypereides, proceeded to take all possible
measures for the defence of the city, while private munificence supplied
the treasury. Demosthenes himself superintended the repair of the
fortifications, and went on a mission to secure a supply of corn. But
Philip, instead of marching upon Athens, sent a message by Demades, whom
he had taken prisoner at Chaeroneia; and the Assembly, in reply,
instructed Demades, Aeschines, and Phocion to ask Philip to release his
Athenian prisoners. Philip released them without ransom, and sent
Antipater and Alexander (with the ashes of the Athenian dead) to offer
terms of peace. By the 'Peace of Demades', concluded while Demosthenes was
still absent, the alliance between Athens and Philip was renewed; the
independence of Athens was guaranteed; Oropus was taken from Thebes and
restored to Athens; and she was permitted to retain Salamis, Samos, Delos,
and probably Lemnos and Imbros. On the other hand, she lost all her
possessions on the Hellespont and in the Chersonese, and promised to join
the league which Philip intended to form for the invasion of Persia.
Demosthenes was selected by the Assembly to deliver the funeral oration
upon those who fell at Chaeroneia; and although the Macedonian party
attacked him repeatedly in the law-courts, he was always acquitted. Philip
paid a long visit to the Peloponnese, in the course of which he placed a
Macedonian garrison in Corinth, ravaged Laconia, giving parts of it to his
allies, the Argives and Arcadians, and announced his plans for the
invasion of Persia at the head of the Greeks; he then returned to

In 337 Demosthenes was again Commissioner of Fortifications, as well as
Controller of the Festival Fund--the most important office in the State.
He not only performed his work most efficiently, but gave considerable
sums for public purposes out of his private fortune; and early in 336
Ctesiphon proposed, and the Council resolved, that he should once more be
crowned at the Dionysia. But before the proposal could be brought before
the Assembly, Aeschines indicted Ctesiphon for its alleged illegality. The
trial did not take place until late in the summer of 330. We do not know
the reason for so long a delay, but probably the events of the intervening
time were such as to render the state of public feeling unfavourable to
Aeschines. In 336 Philip was assassinated, and was succeeded by Alexander.
In 335 Alexander destroyed Thebes, which had revolted, and sold its
inhabitants into slavery. He also demanded from Athens the surrender of
Demosthenes and other anti-Macedonian politicians and generals, but was
persuaded to be content with the banishment of Charidemus and Ephialtes,
and the promise of the prosecution of Demosthenes for using subsidies from
Persia to help Thebes--a prosecution which was allowed to drop. From 334
onwards Alexander was pursuing his conquests in the East, and we know
practically nothing of the history of Athens until the trial of Ctesiphon
came on in 330.

Aeschines alleged against Ctesiphon (1) that it was illegal to propose to
crown any one who had not passed his examination before the Board of
Auditors at the end of his term of office; and that Demosthenes, who had
been Commissioner of Fortifications and Controller of the Festival Fund,
was still in this position: (2) that it was illegal to proclaim the grant
of a crown at the Dionysia, except in the case of crowns conferred by
foreign states: (3) that it was illegal to insert untrue statements in the
public records, and that the language in which Ctesiphon's decree
described the political career of Demosthenes was untrue. On the first
point Aeschines was almost certainly right: Demosthenes' defence is
sophistical, and all that could really be said was that the rule had often
been broken before. On the second point, certainty is impossible: the most
probable view (though it also has its difficulties) is that there were two
inconsistent laws, and that one of them permitted the proclamation in the
theatre, if expressly voted by the people; but the alleged illegality had
certainly been often committed. The third point, which raised the question
of the value to Athens of Demosthenes' whole political life, was that upon
which the case really turned; and it is to this that Demosthenes devotes
the greater part of his speech, breaking up his reply into convenient
stages by discussions (of a far less happy description) of the other
counts of the indictment, and of the character and career of Aeschines. As
in the Speech on the Embassy, certain facts are misrepresented, and there
are passages which are in bad taste; but Demosthenes proves beyond doubt
his unswerving loyalty to the high ideal of policy which he had formed for
his country, and it is with good reason that parts of this speech have
always been felt to reach a height of eloquence which has never been

The jury acquitted Ctesiphon: and Aeschines, failing to obtain a fifth
part of the votes, and thus incurring a heavy fine and the loss of some of
the rights of a citizen, left Athens, and lived most of the remainder of
his life at Rhodes.

The following is an analysis of the speech in outline:--

I. Introduction (Sec.Sec. 1-8).
II. Defence against charges irrelevant to the indictment (Sec.Sec. 9-52).
(1) Introduction (Sec. 9).
(2) Postponement of reply to charges against his private life
(Sec.Sec. 10, 11).
(3) Reply to charges against his public life (Sec.Sec. 12-52).
(a) Criticism of Aeschines' method of attack (Sec.Sec. 12-16).
(b) Reply in reference to the Peace of Philocrates (Sec.Sec. 17-52).
III. Defence against the indictment itself (Sec.Sec. 53-125).
(1) Introduction (Sec.Sec. 53-9).
(2) Defence of his policy B.C. 346-340 (Sec.Sec. 60-109).
(3) The alleged illegality of crowning him before he had passed
his audit (Sec.Sec. 110-19).
(4) The alleged illegality of the proclamation in the theatre
(Sec.Sec. 120, 121).
(5) Conclusion, including criticism of Aeschines' method of attack
(Sec.Sec. 122-5).

IV. Aeschines' life and character (Sec.Sec. 126-59).
(1) Introduction (Sec.Sec. 126-8).
(2) Parentage and early life of Aeschines (Sec.Sec. 129-31).
(3) Aeschines' connexion with Antiphon, Python, Anaxinus, and
others (Sec.Sec. 132-8).
(4) Aeschines' part in stirring up the war against Amphissa in
339 (Sec.Sec. 139-59).

V. Demosthenes' own policy in 339 and 338 (Sec.Sec. 160-226).
(1) Narrative and defence of the alliance with Thebes (Sec.Sec. 160-95).
(2) Why did not Aeschines protest at the time? (Sec.Sec. 196-8).
(3) Defence of his policy as true to the spirit of Athenian history
(Sec.Sec. 199-210).
(4) Narrative and defence, continued (Sec.Sec. 211-22).
(5) Further criticism of Aeschines' method of attack (Sec.Sec. 223-6).

VI. Replies to various arguments of Aeschines (Sec.Sec. 227-96).
(1) Aeschines' comparison of the inquiry to the examination of
a balance-sheet (Sec.Sec. 227-31).
(2) A proper inquiry would show that Demosthenes had increased
the resources of Athens (Sec.Sec. 232-7).
(3) Reply to the charge of saddling Athens with an undue share
of the expense of the war (Sec.Sec. 238-43).
(4) Reply to the charge of responsibility for the defeat of Chaeroneia
(Sec.Sec. 244-7).
(5) Vindication of his policy after the battle of Chaeroneia
(Sec.Sec. 248-51).
(6) Reply to Aeschines' remarks about the harm done to Athens
by Demosthenes' bad fortune (Sec.Sec. 252-75).
(a) General remarks (Sec.Sec. 252-5).
(b) The fortune of Demosthenes (Sec.Sec. 257, 258).
(c) The fortune of Aeschines (Sec.Sec. 259-64).
(d) Comparison of the two (Sec.Sec. 265, 266).
(e) Demosthenes' use of his fortune for purposes of public and
private munificence (Sec.Sec. 267-9).
(f) Demosthenes not responsible for the misfortunes of Athens
(Sec.Sec. 270-5).
(7) Reply to Aeschines' warning against Demosthenes' cleverness
(Sec.Sec. 276-90).
(a) Comparison of the use made of their talents by the two
orators (Sec.Sec. 276-84).
(b) The choice of Demosthenes, not Aeschines, to deliver the
Funeral Oration (Sec.Sec. 285-90).
(8) Aeschines' feelings about the defeat of Chaeroneia (Sec.Sec. 291-3).
(9) The part played by traitors in recent history (Sec.Sec. 294-6).

VII. Epilogue (Sec.Sec. 297-324).
(1) Demosthenes' incorruptibility (Sec.Sec. 297, 298).
(2) Demosthenes' measures for the protection of Athens (Sec.Sec. 299-305).
(3) Comparison of the services of the two orators to Athens
(Sec.Sec. 306-13).
(4) Reply to the comparison of Demosthenes with the men of old,
by a final comparison of the two orators (Sec.Sec. 314-23).
(5) Peroration (Sec. 324).]

{1} I pray first, men of Athens, to every god and goddess, that the
goodwill, which I ever feel towards this city and towards all of you, may
in equal measure be vouchsafed to me by you at this present trial: and
secondly--a prayer which especially touches yourselves, your consciences,
and your reputation--that the gods may put it into your minds not to take
counsel of my adversary[n] in regard to the spirit in which you ought to
hear me (for that would surely be a cruel thing), {2} but of the laws and
of your oath; wherein besides all other precepts of justice, this also is
written--that you shall listen to both sides with a like mind. And this
means, not only that you should have formed no prejudice, and should
accord equal goodwill to each, but also that you should give leave to
every man who pleads before you to adopt that order, and make that
defence, upon which he has resolved and fixed his choice.

{3} I am in many respects at a disadvantage in the present controversy, as
compared with Aeschines; and particularly, men of Athens, in two points of
importance. The first is that I am not contending for the same stake as
he. It is not the same thing for me to lose your goodwill now, as it is
for him to fail to win his case; since for me--but I would say nothing
unpleasant [n]* at the opening of my address--I say only that Aeschines
can well afford to risk this attack upon me. The second disadvantage lies
in the natural and universal tendency of mankind to hear invective and
denunciation with pleasure, and to be offended with those who praise
themselves. {4} And of the two courses in question, that which contributes
to men's pleasure has been given to Aeschines, and that which annoys (I
may say) every one is left for me. If, to avoid giving such annoyance, I
say nothing of all that I myself have done, it will be thought that I am
unable to clear myself of the charges against me, or to show the grounds
upon which I claim to deserve distinction. If, on the other hand, I
proceed to speak of my past acts and my political life, I shall often be
compelled to speak of myself. I will endeavour, then, to do this as
modestly as possible; and for all that the necessities of the case compel
me to say, the blame must in fairness be borne by the prosecutor, who
initiated a trial of such a kind as this.

{5} I think, men of Athens, that you would all admit that this present
trial equally concerns myself and Ctesiphon, and demands no less earnest
attention from me than from him. For while it is a painful and a grievous
thing for a man to be robbed of anything, particularly if it is at the
hands of an enemy that this befalls him, it is especially so, when he is
robbed of your goodwill and kindness, just in proportion as to win these
is the greatest possible gain. {6} And because such is the issue at stake
in the present trial, I request and entreat you all alike to give me,
while I make my defence upon the charges that have been brought against
me, a fair hearing, as you are commanded to do by the laws--those laws to
which their original maker, your well-wisher and the People's friend,
Solon, thought fit to give the sanction not of enactment only, but also of
an oath on the part of those who act as judges: {7} not because he
distrusted you (so at least it seems to me), but because he saw that a
defendant cannot escape from the imputations and the slanders which fall
with special force from the prosecutor, because he is the first to speak,
unless each of you who sit in judgement, keeping his conscience pure in
the sight of God, will receive the pleadings of the later speaker also
with the same favour, and will thus, because his attention has been given
equally and impartially to both sides, form his decision upon the case in
its entirety.

{8} And now, when I am about, as it seems, to render an account of my
whole private life and public career, I would once more invoke the aid of
the gods; and in the presence of you all I pray, first, that the goodwill
which I ever feel towards this city and towards all of you, may in equal
measure be vouchsafed to me by you at this trial; and secondly, that
whatsoever judgement upon this present suit will conduce to your public
reputation, and the purity of each man's conscience, that judgement they
may put it into all your minds to give.

{9} Now if Aeschines had confined his charges to the subject of the
indictment, I too, in making my defence, would have dealt at once with the
actual resolution of the Council. But since he has devoted no less a
portion of his speech to the relation of other matters, and for the most
part has spoken against me falsely, I think it is necessary, and at the
same time just, that I should deal briefly, men of Athens, with these, in
order that none of you may be led by irrelevant arguments to listen less
favourably to my pleas in answer to the indictment itself.

{10} As for his slanderous vituperation of my private life, mark how
straightforward and how just is the reply that I make. If you know me as
the man that he charged me with being (for my life has been spent nowhere
but in your own midst), do not even suffer me to speak--no, not though my
whole public career has been one of transcendent merit--but rise and
condemn me without delay. But if, in your judgement and belief, I am a
better man than Aeschines, and come of better men; if I and mine are no
worse than any other respectable persons (to use no offensive expression);
then do not trust him even in regard to other points, for it is plain that
all that he said was equally fictitious; but once more accord to me to-day
the goodwill which throughout the past you have so often displayed towards
me in previous trials. {11} Knave as you are,[n] Aeschines, you were
assuredly more fool than knave, when you thought that I should dismiss all
that I had to say with regard to my past acts and political life, and
should turn to meet the abuse that fell from you. I shall not do so; I am
not so brain-sick; but I will review the falsehoods and the calumnies
which you uttered against my political career; and then, if the court
desires it, I will afterwards refer to the ribald language that has been
so incontinently used.

{12} The offences charged against me are many; and for some of them the
laws assign heavy and even the most extreme penalties. But I will tell you
what is the motive which animates the present suit. It gives play to the
malice of a personal enemy, to his insolence, his abuse, his contumelies,
and every expression of his hostility: and yet, assuming that the charges
and the imputations which have been made are true, it does not enable the
State[n] to exact a penalty that is adequate, or nearly adequate, to the
offences. {13} For it is not right to seek to debar another from coming
before the people[n] and receiving a hearing, nor to do so in a spirit of
malice and envy. Heaven knows, it is neither straightforward, nor citizen-
like, nor just, men of Athens! If the crimes by which he saw me injuring
the city were of such a magnitude as he just now so theatrically set
forth, he should have had recourse to the punishments enjoined by the laws
at the time of the crimes themselves. If he saw me so acting as to deserve
impeachment, he should have impeached me, and so brought me to trial
before you; if he saw me proposing illegal measures, he should have
indicted me for their illegality. For surely, if he can prosecute
Ctesiphon on my account, he would not have failed to indict me in person,
had he thought that he could convict me. {14} And further, if he saw me
committing any of those other crimes against you, which he just now
slanderously enumerated, or any other crimes whatsoever, there are laws
which deal with each, and punishments, and lawsuits and judgements
involving penalties that are harsh and severe: to all of these he could
have had recourse; and from the moment when it was seen that he had acted
so, and had conducted his hostilities against me on that plan, his present
accusation of me would have been in line with his past conduct. {15} But
as it is, he has forsaken the straight path of justice; he has shrunk from
all attempts to convict me at the time; and after all these years, with
the imputations, the jests, the invectives, that he has accumulated, he
appears to play his part. So it is, that though his accusations are
against me, it is Ctesiphon that he prosecutes; and though he sets his
quarrel with me in the forefront of the whole suit, he has never faced me
in person to settle the quarrel, and it is another whom we see him trying
to deprive of his civil rights. {16} Yet surely, besides everything else
that may be pleaded on behalf of Ctesiphon, this, I think, may surely be
most reasonably urged--that we ought in justice to have brought our own
quarrel to the test by ourselves, instead of avoiding all conflict with
one another, and looking for a third party to whom we could do harm. Such
iniquity really passes all bounds.

{17} From this one may see the nature of all his charges alike, uttered,
as they have been, without justice or regard for truth. Yet I desire also
to examine them severally, and more particularly the false statements
which he made against me in regard to the Peace and the Embassy, when he
ascribed to me[n] the things which he himself had done in conjunction with
Philocrates. And here it is necessary, men of Athens, and perhaps
appropriate,[n] that I should remind you of the state of affairs
subsisting during that period, so that you may view each group of actions
in the light of the circumstances of the time.

{18} When the Phocian war had broken out[n] (not through any action of
mine, for I had not yet entered public life), your own attitude, in the
first place, was such, that you wished for the preservation of the
Phocians, although you saw that their actions were unjustifiable; while
you would have been delighted at anything that might happen to the
Thebans, against whom you felt an indignation that was neither
unreasonable nor unfair; for they had not used their good fortune at
Leuctra with moderation. And, in the second place, the Peloponnese was all
disunited: those who detested the Spartans [n] were not strong enough to
annihilate them, and those who had previously governed with the support of
Sparta [n] were no longer able to maintain their control over their
cities; but both these and all the other states were in a condition of
indeterminate strife and confusion. {19} When Philip saw this (for it was
not hard to see), he tried, by dispensing money to the traitors whom each
state contained, to throw them all into collision and stir up one against
another; and thus, amid the blunders and perversity of others, he was
making his own preparations, and growing great to the danger of all. And
when it became clear to all that the then overbearing (but now unhappy)
Thebans, distressed by the length of the war, would be forced to fly to
you for aid,[n] Philip, to prevent this--to prevent the formation of any
union between the cities--made offers of peace to you, and of assistance
to them. {20} Now what was it that helped him, and enabled him to find in
you his almost willing dupes? It was the baseness (if that is the right
name to use), or the ignorance, or both, of the rest of the Hellenes, who,
though you were engaged in a long and continuous war, and that on behalf
of the interests of all, as has been proved by the event, never assisted
you either with money or with men, or in any other way whatsoever. And in
your just and proper indignation with them, you listened readily to
Philip. It was for these reasons, therefore, and not through any action of
mine, that the Peace which we then conceded was negotiated; and any one
who investigates the matter honestly will find that it is the crimes and
the corrupt practices of these men, in the course of the negotiations,
that are responsible for our position to-day. {21} It is in the interests
of truth that I enter into all these events with this exactitude and
thoroughness; for however strong the appearance of criminality in these
proceedings may be, it has, I imagine, nothing to do with me. The first
man to suggest or mention the Peace was Aristodemus[n] the actor; and the
person who took the matter up and moved the motion, and sold his services
for the purpose, along with Aeschines, was Philocrates of Hagnus--your
partner, Aeschines, not mine, even if you split your sides with lying;
while those who supported him, from whatever motive (for of that I say
nothing at present), were Eubulus and Cephisophon. I had no part in the
matter anywhere. {22} And yet, although the facts are such as with
absolute truth I am representing them to be, he carried his effrontery so
far as to dare to assert that I was not only responsible for the Peace,
but had also prevented the city from acting in conjunction with a general
assembly of the Hellenes in making it. What? and you--oh! how can one find
a name that can be applied to you?--when you saw me (for you were there)
preventing the city from taking this great step and forming so grand an
alliance as you just now described, did you once raise a protest or come
forward to give information and to set forth the crimes with which you now
charge me? {23} If I had covenanted with Philip for money that I would
prevent the coalition of the Hellenes, your only course was to refuse to
keep silence--to cry aloud, to protest, to reveal the fact to your fellow
countrymen. On no occasion did you do this: no such utterance of yours was
ever heard by any one. In fact there was no embassy away at the time on a
mission to any Hellenic state; the Hellenes had all long ago been tried
and found wanting;[n] and in all that he has said upon this matter there
is not a single sound word. {24} And, apart from that, his falsehoods
involve the greatest calumnies upon this city. For if you were at one and
the same time convoking the Hellenes with a view to war, and sending
ambassadors yourselves to Philip to discuss peace, it was a deed for a
Eurybatus,[n] not a task for a state or for honest men, that you were
carrying out. But that is not the case; indeed it is not. For what could
possibly have been your object in summoning them at that moment? Was it
with a view to peace? But they all had peace already. Or with a view to
war? But you were yourselves discussing peace. It is therefore evident
that neither was it I that introduced or was responsible for the Peace in
its original shape, nor is one of all the other falsehoods which he told
of me shown to be true.

{25} Again, consider the course of action which, when the city had
concluded the Peace, each of us now chose to adopt. For from this you will
know who it was that co-operated with Philip throughout, and who it was
that acted in your interest and sought the good of the city. As for me, I
proposed, as a member of the Council, that the ambassadors should sail as
quickly as possible to any district in which they should ascertain Philip
to be, and receive his oath from him. {26} But even when I had carried
this resolution, they would not act upon it. What did this mean, men of
Athens? I will inform you. Philip's interest required that the interval
before he took the oath should be as long as possible; yours, that it
should be as short as possible. And why? Because you broke off all your
preparations for the war, not merely from the day when he took the oath,
but from the day when you first hoped that Peace would be made; and for
his part, this was what he was all along working for; for he thought (and
with truth) that whatever places he could snatch from Athens before he
took the oath, would remain securely his, since no one would break the
Peace for their sake. {27} Foreseeing and calculating upon this, men of
Athens, I proposed this decree--that we should sail to any district in
which Philip might be, and receive his oath as soon as possible, in order
that the oaths might be taken while the Thracians, your allies, were still
in possession of those strongholds[n] of which Aeschines just now spoke
with contempt--Serrhium, Myrtenum, and Ergiske; and that Philip might not
snatch from us the keys of the country and make himself master of Thrace,
nor obtain an abundant supply of money and of soldiers, and so proceed
without difficulty to the prosecution of his further designs. {28} And
now, instead of citing or reading this decree he slanders me on the ground
that I thought fit, as a member of the Council, to introduce the envoys.
But what should I have done? Was I to propose _not_ to introduce those who
had come for the express purpose of speaking with you? or to order the
lessee of the theatre not to assign them seats? But they would have
watched the play from the threepenny seats,[n] if this decree had not been
proposed. Should I have guarded the interests of the city in petty
details, and sold them wholesale, as my opponents did? Surely not. (_To
the clerk_.) Now take this decree, which the prosecutor passed over,
though he knew it well, and read it.

{29} [_The decree of Demosthenes is read_.]

{30} Though I had carried this decree, and was seeking the good not of
Philip, but of the city, these worthy ambassadors paid little heed to it,
but sat idle in Macedonia for three whole months,[n] until Philip arrived
from Thrace, after subduing the whole country; when they might, within ten
days, or equally well[n] within three or four, have reached the
Hellespont, and saved the strongholds, by receiving his oath before he
could seize them. For he would not have touched them when we were present;
or else, if he had done so, we should have refused to administer the oath
to him; and in that case he would have failed to obtain the Peace: he
would not have had both the Peace and the strongholds as well.

{31} Such was Philip's first act of fraud, during the time of the Embassy,
and the first instance of venality on the part of these wicked men; and
over this I confess that then and now and always I have been and am at war
and at variance with them. Now observe, immediately after this, a second
and even greater piece of villainy. {32} As soon as Philip had sworn to
the Peace, after first gaining possession of Thrace because these men did
not obey my decree, he obtained from them--again by purchase--the
postponement of our departure from Macedonia, until all should be in
readiness for his campaign against the Phocians; in order that, instead of
our bringing home a report of his intentions and his preparations for the
march, which would make you set out and sail round to Thermopylae with
your war-ships as you did before,[n] you might only hear our report of the
facts when he was already on this side of Thermopylae, and you could do
nothing. {33} And Philip was beset with such fear and such a weight of
anxiety, lest in spite of his occupation of these places, his object
should slip from his grasp, if, before the Phocians were destroyed, you
resolved to assist them, that he hired this despicable creature, not now
in company with his colleagues, but by himself alone, to make to you a
statement and a report of such a character that owing to them all was
lost. {34} But I request and entreat you, men of Athens, to remember
throughout this whole trial, that, had Aeschines made no accusation that
was not included in the indictment, I too would not have said a word that
did not bear upon it; but since he has had recourse to all kinds of
imputation and slander at once, I am compelled also to give a brief answer
to each group of charges. {35} What then were the statements uttered by
him that day, in consequence of which all was lost? 'You must not be
perturbed,' he said, 'at Philip's having crossed to this side of
Thermopylae; for you will get everything that you desire, if you remain
quiet; and within two or three days you will hear that he has become the
friend of those whose enemy he was, and the enemy of those whose friend he
was, when he first came. For,' said he, 'it is not phrases that confirm
friendships' (a finely sententious expression!) 'but identity of interest;
and it is to the interest of Philip and of the Phocians and of yourselves
alike, to be rid of the heartless and overbearing demeanour of the
Thebans.' {36} To these statements some gave a ready ear, in consequence
of the tacit ill-feeling towards the Thebans at the time. What then
followed--and not after a long interval, but immediately? The Phocians
were overthrown; their cities were razed to the ground; you, who had
believed Aeschines and remained inactive, were soon afterwards bringing in
your effects from the country; while Aeschines received his gold; and
besides all this, the city reaped the ill-will of the Thebans and
Thessalians, while their gratitude for what had been done went to Philip.
{37} To prove that this is so, (_to the clerk_) read me both the decree of
Callisthenes,[n] and Philip's letter. (_To the jury_.) These two documents
together will make all the facts plain. (_To the clerk_.) Read.

{38} [_The decree of Callisthenes is read_.]

Were these the hopes, on the strength of which you made the Peace? Was
this what this hireling promised you? {39} (_To the clerk_.) Now read the
letter which Philip sent after this.

[_Philip's letter is read_.]

{40} You hear how obviously, in this letter sent to you, Philip is
addressing definite information to his own allies. 'I have done these
things,' he tells them, 'against the will of the Athenians, and to their
annoyance; and so, men of Thebes and Thessaly, if you are wise, you will
regard them as enemies, and will trust me.' He does not write in those
actual terms, but that is what he intends to indicate. By these means he
so carried them away, that they did not foresee or realize any of the
consequences, but allowed him to get everything into his own power: and
that is why, poor men, they have experienced their present calamities.
{41} But the man who helped him to create this confidence, who co-operated
with him, who brought home that false report and deluded you, he it is who
now bewails the sufferings of the Thebans and enlarges upon their
piteousness--he, who is himself the cause both of these and of the misery
in Phocis, and of all the other evils which the Hellenes have endured.
Yes, it is evident that you are pained at what has come to pass,
Aeschines, and that you are sorry for the Thebans, when you have property
in Boeotia[n] and are farming the land that was theirs; and that I rejoice
at it--I, whose surrender was immediately demanded by the author of the
disaster! {42} But I have digressed into subjects of which it will perhaps
be more convenient to speak presently. I will return to the proofs which
show that it is the crimes of these men that are the cause of our
condition to-day.

For when you had been deceived by Philip, through the agency of these men,
who while serving as ambassadors had sold themselves and made a report in
which there was not a word of truth--when the unhappy Phocians had been
deceived and their cities annihilated--what followed? {43} The despicable
Thessalians and the slow-witted Thebans regarded Philip as their friend,
their benefactor, their saviour. Philip was their all-in-all. They would
not even listen to the voice of any one who wished to express a different
opinion. You yourselves, though you viewed what had been done with
suspicion and vexation, nevertheless kept the Peace; for there was nothing
else that you could have done. And the other Hellenes, who, like
yourselves, had been deluded and disappointed of their hopes,[n] also kept
the Peace, and gladly;[n] since in a sense they also were remotely aimed
at by the war. {44} For when Philip was going about and subduing the
Illyrians and Triballi and some of the Hellenes as well, and bringing many
large forces into his own power, and when some of the members of the
several States were taking advantage of the Peace to travel to Macedonia,
and were being corrupted--Aeschines among them--at such a time all of
those whom Philip had in view in thus making his preparations were really
being attacked by him. {45} Whether they failed to realize it is another
question, which does not concern me. For I was continually uttering
warnings and protests, both in your midst and wherever I was sent. But the
cities were stricken with disease: those who were engaged in political and
practical affairs were taking bribes and being corrupted by the hope of
money; while the mass of private citizens either showed no foresight, or
else were caught by the bait of ease and leisure from day to day; and all
alike had fallen victims to some such delusive fancy, as that the danger
would come upon every one but themselves, and that through the perils of
others they would be able to secure their own position as they pleased.
{46} And so, I suppose, it has come to pass that the masses have atoned
for their great and ill-timed indifference by the loss of their freedom,
while the leaders in affairs, who fancied that they were selling
everything except themselves, have realized that they had sold themselves
first of all. For instead of being called friends and guest-friends, as
they were called at the time when they were taking their bribes, they now
hear themselves called flatterers, and god-forsaken, and all the other
names that they deserve. {47} For no one, men of Athens, spends his money
out of a desire to benefit the traitor; nor, when once he has secured the
object for which he bargains, does he employ the traitor to advise him
with regard to other objects: if it were so, nothing could be happier than
a traitor. But it is not so, of course. Far from it! When the aspirant
after dominion has gained his object, he is also the master of those who
have sold it to him: and because then he knows their villainy, he then
hates and mistrusts them, and covers them with insults. {48} For observe--
for even if the time of the events is past, the time for realizing truths
like these is ever present to wise men. Lasthenes[n] was called his
'friend'; but only until he had betrayed Olynthus. And Timolaus;[n] but
only until he had destroyed Thebes. And Eudicus and Simus[n] of Larissa;
but only until they had put Thessaly in Philip's power. And now,
persecuted as they are, and insulted, and subjected to every kind of
misery, the whole inhabited world has become filled with such men. And
what of Aristratus[n] at Sicyon? what of Perillus[n] at Megara? Are they
not outcasts? {49} From these instances one can see very clearly, that it
is he who best protects his own country and speaks most constantly against
such men, that secures for traitors and hirelings like yourselves,
Aeschines, the continuance of your opportunities for taking bribes. It is
the majority of those who are here, those who resist your will, that you
must thank for the fact that you live and draw your pay; for, left to
yourselves, you would long ago have perished.

{50} There is still much that I might say about the transactions of that
time, but I think that even what I have said is more than enough. The
blame rests with Aeschines, who has drenched me with the stale dregs[n] of
his own villainy and crime, from which I was compelled to clear myself in
the eyes of those who are too young to remember the events; though perhaps
you who knew, even before I said a single word, of Aeschines' service as a
hireling, may have felt some annoyance as you listened. {51} He calls it,
forsooth, 'friendship' and 'guest-friendship'; and somewhere in his speech
just now he used the expression, 'the man who casts in my teeth my guest-
friendship with Alexander.' _I_ cast in your teeth your guest-friendship
with Alexander? How did you acquire it? How came you to be thought worthy
of it? Never would I call you the guest-friend of Philip or the friend of
Alexander--I am not so insane--unless you are to call harvesters and other
hired servants the friends and guest-friends of those who have hired them.
[But that is not the case, of course. Far from it!] {52} Nay, I call you
the hireling, formerly of Philip, and now of Alexander, and so do all who
are present. If you disbelieve me, ask them--or rather I will ask them for
you. Men of Athens, do you think of Aeschines as the hireling or as the
guest-friend of Alexander? You hear what they say.

{53} I now wish, without more delay, to make my defence upon the
indictment itself, and to go through my past acts, in order that Aeschines
may hear (though he knows them well) the grounds on which I claim to have
a right both to the gifts which the Council have proposed, and even to far
greater than these. (_To the clerk_.) Now take the indictment and read it.

{54, 55} [The indictment is read.]

{56} These, men of Athens, are the points in the resolution which the
prosecutor assails; and these very points will, I think, afford me my
first means of proving to you that the defence which I am about to offer
is an absolutely fair one. For I will take the points of the indictment in
the very same order as the prosecutor: I will speak of each in succession,
and will knowingly pass over nothing. {57} Any decision upon the statement
that I 'consistently do and say what is best for the People, and am eager
to do whatever good I can', and upon the proposal to vote me thanks for
this, depends, I consider, upon my past political career: for it is by an
investigation of my career that either the truth and the propriety, or
else the falsehood, of these statements which Ctesiphon has made about me
will be discovered. {58} Again, the proposal to crown me, without the
addition of the clause 'when he has submitted to his examination', and the
order to proclaim the award of the crown in the theatre, must, I imagine,
stand or fall with my political career; for the question is whether I
deserve the crown and the proclamation before my fellow countrymen or not.
At the same time I consider myself further bound to point out to you the
laws under which the defendant's proposal could be made. In this honest
and straightforward manner, men of Athens, I have determined to make my
defence; and now I will proceed to speak of my past actions themselves.
{59} And let no one imagine that I am detaching my argument from its
connexion with the indictment, if I break into a discussion of
international transactions. For it is the prosecutor who, by assailing the
clause of the decree which states that I do and say what is best, and by
indicting it as false, has rendered the discussion of my whole political
career essentially germane to the indictment; and further, out of the many
careers which public life offers, it was the department of international
affairs that I chose; so that I have a right to derive my proofs also from
that department.

{60} I will pass over all that Philip snatched from us and secured, in the
days before I took part in public life as an orator. None of these losses,
I imagine, has anything to do with me. But I will recall to you, and will
render you an account of all that, from the day when I entered upon this
career, he was _prevented_ from taking, when I have made one remark. {61}
Philip, men of Athens, had a great advantage in his favour. For in the
midst of the Hellenic peoples--and not of some only, but of all alike--
there had sprung up a crop of traitors--corrupt, god-forsaken men--more
numerous than they have ever been within the memory of man. These he took
to help and co-operate with him; and great as the mutual ill-will and
dissensions of the Hellenes already were, he rendered them even worse, by
deceiving some, making presents to others, and corrupting others in every
way; and at a time when all had in reality but one interest--to prevent
his becoming powerful--he divided them into a number of factions. {62} All
the Hellenes then being in this condition, still ignorant of the growing
and accumulating evil, you have to ask yourselves, men of Athens, what
policy and action it was fitting for the city to choose, and to hold me
responsible for this; for the person who assumed that responsibility in
the State was myself. {63} Should she, Aeschines, have sacrificed her
pride and her own dignity? Should she have joined the ranks of the
Thessalians and Dolopes,[n] and helped Philip to acquire the empire of
Hellas, cancelling thereby the noble and righteous deeds of our
forefathers? Or, if she should not have done this (for it would have been
in very truth an atrocious thing), should she have looked on, while all
that she saw would happen, if no one prevented it--all that she realized,
it seems, at a distance--was actually taking place? {64} Nay, I should be
glad to ask to-day the severest critic of my actions, which party he would
have desired the city to join--the party which shares the responsibility
for the misery and disgrace which has fallen upon the Hellenes (the party
of the Thessalians and their supporters, one may call it), or the party
which looked on while these calamities were taking place, in the hope of
gaining some advantage for themselves--in which we should place the
Arcadians and Messenians and Argives. {65} But even of these, many--nay,
all--have in the end fared worse than we. For if Philip had departed
immediately after his victory, and gone his way; if afterwards he had
remained at peace, and had given no trouble whatever to any of his own
allies or of the other Hellenes; then there would have been some ground
for blaming and accusing those who had opposed his plans. But if he has
stripped them all alike of their dignity, their paramountcy, and their
independence--nay, even of their free constitutions,[n] wherever he could
do so--can it be denied that the policy which you adopted on my advice was
the most glorious policy possible?

{66} But I return to my former point. What was it fitting for the city to
do, Aeschines, when she saw Philip establishing for himself a despotic
sway over the Hellenes? What language should have been used, what measures
proposed, by the adviser of the people at Athens (for that it was at
Athens makes the utmost difference), when I knew that from the very first,
up to the day when I myself ascended the platform, my country had always
contended for pre-eminence, honour, and glory, and in the cause of honour,
and for the interests of all, had sacrificed more money and lives than any
other Hellenic people had spent for their private ends: {67} when I saw
that Philip himself, with whom our conflict lay, for the sake of empire
and absolute power, had had his eye knocked out, his collar-bone broken,
his hand and his leg maimed, and was ready to resign any part of his body
that Fortune chose to take from him, provided that with what remained he
might live in honour and glory? {68} And surely no one would dare to say
that it was fitting that in one bred at Pella, a place then inglorious and
insignificant, there should have grown up so lofty a spirit that he
aspired after the empire of Hellas, and conceived such a project in his
mind; but that in you, who are Athenians, and who day by day in all that
you hear and see behold the memorials of the gallantry of your
forefathers, such baseness should be found, that you would yield up your
liberty to Philip by your own deliberate offer and deed. {69} No man would
say this. One alternative remained, and that, one which you were bound to
take--that of a righteous resistance to the whole course of action by
which he was doing you injury. You acted thus from the first, quite
rightly and properly; while I helped by my proposals and advice during the
time of my political activity, and I do not deny it. But what ought I to
have done? For the time has come to ask you this, Aeschines, and to
dismiss everything else. {70} Amphipolis, Pydna, Poteidaea, Halonnesus--
all are blotted from my memory. As for Serrhium, Doriscus, the sack of
Peparethus, and all the other injuries inflicted upon the city, I renounce
all knowledge of their ever having happened--though you actually said that
_I_ involved my countrymen in hostility by talking of these things, when
the decrees which deal with them were the work of Eubulus and
Aristophon[n] and Diopeithes,[n] and not mine at all--so glibly do you
assert anything that suits your purpose! {71} But of this too I say
nothing at present. I only ask you whether Philip, who was appropriating
Euboea,[n] and establishing it as a stronghold to command Attica; who was
making an attempt upon Megara, seizing Oreus, razing the walls of
Porthmus, setting up Philistides as tyrant at Oreus and Cleitarchus at
Eretria, bringing the Hellespont into his own power, besieging Byzantium,
destroying some of the cities of Hellas, and restoring his exiled friends
to others--whether he, I say, in acting thus, was guilty of wrong,
violating the truce and breaking the Peace, or not? Was it fit that one of
the Hellenes should arise to prevent it, or not? {72} If it was not fit--
if it was fit that Hellas should become like the Mysian booty[n] in the
proverb before men's eyes, while the Athenians had life and being, then I
have lost my labour in speaking upon this theme, and the city has lost its
labour in obeying me: then let everything that has been done be counted
for a crime and a blunder, and those my own! But if it was right that one
should arise to prevent it, for whom could the task be more fitting than
for the people of Athens? That then, was the aim of _my_ policy; and when

Book of the day:
Facebook Google Reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Pinterest